Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in Peripheral Arterial Disease

September 5, 2019 updated by: University of Kansas Medical Center

To Assess the Safety and Feasibility of a Structured Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease After Successful Revascularization Procedures: A Pilot Study.

The main purpose of this study is to see if it is safe and feasible to use cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) after successful revascularization. This study will also test if CR improves quality of life and health outcomes in PAD patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160
        • University of Kansas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with PAD post-revascularization (stent, angioplasty, or bypass).
  • Patients must have the ability to ambulate safely without assistance and should not have plans for undergoing further staged revascularization procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Below or above the knee amputation.
  • Underlying cardiopulmonary or other co-morbidity that would be an exclusion under currently approved standard CR protocols at the University of Kansas Medical Center (KUMC).
  • Unfavorable short term prognosis and limited life expectancy (<2 years)
  • Awaiting a planned staged revascularization in same or other leg (patients will be eligible once no further procedures are planned).
  • Prior history of having dropped out of CR without completing.
  • Unwilling to consent for all aspects of CR or study participation.
  • Unable to come for CR (this will exclude patients who live far away or have no means to travel to the CR facility).
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cardiac Rehabilitation Group
Participants randomized to this group will undergo cardiac rehabilitation program.

Program will involve 36 sessions. These will be scheduled as 3 sessions per week. If you cannot complete 3 sessions per week the 36 sessions could be spread out over 6 months.

Each session will last between 30-60 minutes. Sessions will involve aerobic activity, diet/nutritional counseling, and smoking cessation information.

Active Comparator: Control Group
Participants randomized to this group will receive care for their condition, conventional therapy, that they would normally receive.
Participants will be asked to complete tests and questionnaires that would normally be done for their condition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 6 minute walk test
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Up to 6 Months
Results will be measured in meters.
Change from Baseline to Up to 6 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Up to 6 Months
Change in quality of life measured using the SF-36. The survey has 36 questions and measure eight health dimensions. The scores range from 0-100. A higher score represents less disability. A lower score represents more disability.
Change from Baseline to Up to 6 Months
Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Week 18
Change in quality of life measured using the SF-36. The survey has 36 questions and measure eight health dimensions. The scores range from 0-100. A higher score represents less disability. A lower score represents more disability.
Change from Baseline to Week 18
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire-6 (VascuQol6)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Up to 6 Months

The six-item Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol-6) is a valid, practical, and responsive instrument for the assessment of health-related QOL in patients with PAD. The main advantage is the compact format that offers a possibility for routine use in busy clinical settings.

Range of scores and what they represent: Each question is scored 1-4. The total score is achieved by summarizing the score on each question, resulting in a score between 6 and 24. Higher value indicates better health status.

Change from Baseline to Up to 6 Months
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire-6 (VascuQol6)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Week 18

The six-item Vascular Quality of Life (VascuQol-6) is a valid, practical, and responsive instrument for the assessment of health-related QOL in patients with PAD. The main advantage is the compact format that offers a possibility for routine use in busy clinical settings.

Range of scores and what they represent: Each question is scored 1-4. The total score is achieved by summarizing the score on each question, resulting in a score between 6 and 24. Higher value indicates better health status.

Change from Baseline to Week 18
Absolute Claudication Distance (ACD)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Up to 6 Months
ACD is defined as the walking distance after which a patient had to stop walking to relieve claudication pain. Distance is measured in meters
Change from Baseline to Up to 6 Months
Functional Claudication Distance (FCD)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to Up to 6 Months
FCD is defined as the distance a patient would prefer to stop because of claudication pain. Distance is measured in meters.
Change from Baseline to Up to 6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kamal Gupta, MD, University of Kansas Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 13, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

3
Subscribe