Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan Study of Bone Healing Following Open Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy (CISKO)

February 12, 2018 updated by: Ellipse Technologies, Inc.

Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan Study of Bone Healing Following Open Wedge

The purpose of this study is to assess whether there is a difference between the TomoFix and Ellipse Intramedullary HTO Nail System in terms of bone regeneration in the tibial wedge by performing a CT-scan at 3 and 6-months postoperatively.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Malalignment of the knee joint causes arthritis in later life. Currently there are three surgical ways to treat knee arthritis: total knee replacement, partial knee replacement, and high tibial osteotomy (HTO). The former two very much focus on treating the effect of malalignment, i.e. removing the arthritic joint. However, HTO addresses the cause of the arthritis, namely the joint malalignment. This preserves the patient's joint and it means that a patient will start using the unaffected part of the knee joint more.

HTO involves cutting a wedge out the tibia to correct the alignment of that bone with the knee joint, to redistribute load from the affected medial part to lateral part. To keep the tibia in the new position, a medical nail device is attached to keep it in place and allow new bone to regenerate within the wedge. Currently, the market leader for HTO is the TomoFix (by DePuySynthes company) plate and nail device. As the name suggests, TomoFix is fixed at surgery and therefore the change in bone angle cannot be changed afterwards. It does mean that patients can be weight-bearing on the affected leg soon after the HTO procedure. A new CE-marked device is being tested in an interventional trial; it is produced by Ellipse Technologies. This device is an extendable nail and inserted intramedullary; following surgery the nail is tend slowly extended over a period of time until the bone correction is satisfactory.

The CISKO imaging study will assess whether there is a difference between the TomoFix and Ellipse system in terms of bone regeneration in the tibial wedge by performing a CT-scan at 3 and 6 months post-operatively. This will be quantified by two independent radiological reports. A secondary objective is to investigate patient satisfaction and also patient pain levels at these time intervals. The degree of bone healing is usually the main factor holding clinicians back when it comes to advising patients on what activities they can return to post-operatively. A difference in bone healing between the two systems may impact on the advice clinicians can give patients regarding recommencing more intense activities such as recreational sports, which ultimately could positively impact patients' health and well-being.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

12

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Carlisle, United Kingdom, CA2 7HY
        • North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Indicated treatment with medial open wedge proximal tibial osteotomy, either with Tomofix device or Ellipse device
  2. Provision of written informed consent
  3. Males
  4. Mental capacity

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Under age (< 18 years)
  2. Patients lacking mental capacity.
  3. Females
  4. Current use of nicotine products.
  5. Patients who cannot understand English and therefore cannot be consented.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Ellipse IM HTO Nail
In this arm, the subjects varus malalignment is corrected with Ellipse Intramedullary High Tibial Osteotomy Intramedullary Nail, which is a CE device. The device achieves the correction via progressive distraction osteogenesis.
A CT scan will be performed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively to assess the healing of the osteotomy site. Endpoint is 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: TomoFix
In this arm, the subjects varus malalignment is corrected with Synthes TomoFix system, which is a CE device. The device achieves the correction via fixating an accute intraoperative correction of the varus malalignment.
A CT scan will be performed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively to assess the healing of the osteotomy site. Endpoint is 6 months.
Other Names:
  • Computerized Tomography (CT) Scan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healing of the osteotomy site
Time Frame: 6-month postoperative

Healing of the osteotomy site after final correction as assessed by two independent radiology reports based on visual assessment of the CT imaging. The scoring system is derived from a study by Brosset and colleagues (Brosset et al, 2011). In addition to a pure clinician perspective of the healing process, CT imaging data will also be used to quantify and describe:

  • definition of osteotomy line,
  • osteotomy margin,
  • osteotomy gap,
  • callus appearances,
  • callus to cortex ratio,
  • bridging of the bone, including complete union and healing.
  • application of region of interest (ROI) to quantify bone density of the callus formation
6-month postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Pain Scale
Time Frame: 6-month postoperative
A patient reported outcome of their perception of pain
6-month postoperative
Osteotomy patient satisfaction questionnaire
Time Frame: 6-month postoperative
A patient reported outcome of the patient's perception of satisfaction with treatment
6-month postoperative
SF-12 Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6-month postoperative
A validated patient reported outcome.
6-month postoperative
KOOS Knee Health Questionnaire
Time Frame: 6-month postoperative
A validated patient reported outcome.
6-month postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PR0251

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe