Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pelvic Reconstruction

March 6, 2018 updated by: Xirong Guo, Nanjing Medical University

Risk Factors for Recurrence After Pelvic Reconstruction of Pelvic Organ Prolapse:1 Year Follow-up in Patients Implanted Hernia Mesh and Biological Graft

232 women underwent transvaginal mesh repair (TVM)with /without transvaginal hysterectomy for symptomatic POP, including group A(accepted herniamesh polypropylene mesh, 117 patients);group B (underwent biological graft of cook,115 patients);follow-ups for six months and one year after the surgery and a questionnaire about the life habits associated with relapse.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

We prospectively study a total of 232 women who underwent transvaginal mesh repair (TVM)with /without transvaginal hysterectomy for symptomatic POP, the patients into two groups :group A was accepted herniamesh polypropylene mesh(117);group B underwent biological graft of cook(115);Each patient underwent an interview that included a POP-Q which was quantified according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitation (POPQ) system;follow-ups for six months and one year after the surgery and a questionnaire about the life habits associated with relapse.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

232

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

52 years to 76 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

242 postmenopausal patients with primary prolapse of the anterior vaginal wall or concomitant uterine prolapse,that was stage Ⅲ or higher (according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification [POP-Q] system).

Exclusion Criteria:

pelvic floor repair surgery history and recurrent patients ; pelvic cancer and radiation to the pelvic area in the previous 6 months; simple uterine prolapse; combined with severe stress urinary incontinence or overactive bladder (OAB); local or systemic conditions that would preclude surgery or affect healing such as restricted leg motion (inability to conform to the lithotomy position) ; vaginal bleeding; infection; coagulation disorders; uncontrolled hypertension and diabetes mellitus;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group A
accepted herniamesh mesh
Patients were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1,by using SPSS19.0 statistical software, to either trocar-guided transvaginal mesh(herniamesh, group A) or biological graft (cook, group B)repair.
Experimental: group B
accepted biological graft of cook
Patients were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1,by using SPSS19.0 statistical software, to either trocar-guided transvaginal mesh(herniamesh, group A) or biological graft (cook, group B)repair.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrence
Time Frame: at 12 months after surgery
Recurrence was defined as a POP-quantification system stage ≥IIb or any symptomatic prolapse.
at 12 months after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
perioperative complications
Time Frame: 12 months after surgery
perioperative complications such as mesh exposure, extrusion , dyspareunia, urinary symptoms(New continence), pain (chronic pelvic pain and hip pain)
12 months after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2018

Last Verified

February 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Subscribe