- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03518749
Effects of tDCS-enhanced Cognitive Control Training on Depression
Deficient cognitive control (CC) is one of the central characteristics of major depression (MD). Hypoactivation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) has been linked with this deficit. Antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapies modify CC most-likely as a common mechanism of treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, simple and effective non-invasive method to modulate the cortical excitability. It has been shown, that the activity of the dlPFC can be modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with polarity-dependent learning-phase specific effects on performance that, when combined with training, can outlast the stimulation.
The goal of this randomized, sham-controlled, rater blind clinical trial is to investigate the effect of a tDCS-enhanced CC Training (CCT) on depressive symptom severity and compare the stimulation intensities 1mA, 2mA and sham tDCS. Overall, the study will include 57 participants (n = 19 per group). Each participant will complete 12 training sessions with online sham/ anodal tDCS.
As a training task we will use an adaptive version of the paced auditory serial addition task (PASAT). In the PASAT, digits are presented auditive and participants have to add the current digit to the digit they heard before. In the adaptive version the interstimulus-intervals decrease (increase) when four consecutive trials are correct (incorrect). The PASAT is known to elicit frustration. Participants have to exert cognitive control over these emotions to complete the task successfully.
Before, during and after the training symptom severity will be assessed. Baseline and post-training performance in the PASAT and in a transfer task (delayed working memory task, DWM) will be measured.
To further explore variables that influence the effect of tDCS on depressive symptom severity we will measure brain activity (EEG, NIRS), heart rate, global functioning (GAF), emotion regulation strategies, self-esteem, mood ratings and subjective performance ratings before and after the training and collect genetic factors.
Sustainability of the training effects will be measured at a follow-up visit (3 months later).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Baden-Württemberg
-
Tubingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, 72076
- Recruiting
- University Hospital Tuebingen
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- current Major Depressive Episode
- right handedness
Exclusion Criteria:
- history of seizures
- Intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth, that cannot be safely removed
- pregnancy
- use of mood stabilizers
- diagnosed bipolar disorder
- current substance abuse (nicotine excluded)
- current substance addiction (nicotine excluded)
- diagnosed psychotic diseases
- diagnosed anorexia nervosa
- diagnosed personality disorders: cluster A, antisocial personality disorder,
- borderline personality disorder
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: 1mA anodal tDCS + cognitive control training
1 mA anodal tDCS will be administered to the left dlPFC (F3) for 23 mins during the performance of a cognitive control training.
|
transcranial direct current stimulation with the intensity of 1mA
cognitive control training with the PASAT
|
Active Comparator: 2mA tDCS + cognitive control training
2 mA anodal tDCS will be administered to the left dlPFC (F3) for 23 mins during the performance of a cognitive control training.
|
cognitive control training with the PASAT
transcranial direct current stimulation with the intensity of 2mA
|
Placebo Comparator: sham tDCS + cognitive control training
Sham tDCS (30 secs of tDCS) will be administered to the left dlPFC (F3) with 2mA at the beginning of a cognitive control training.
|
cognitive control training with the PASAT
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change of MADRS scores
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the last training session (week 4, day 26)
|
Change in Depressive Symptom severity will be measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from Baseline session to the last stimulation session, scale range from 0 to 60 points, higher scores indicate a more severe depression
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the last training session (week 4, day 26)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
BDI scores
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
Beck Depression Inventory
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
Number of correct trials in the PASAT
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
Performance in the PASAT.
Number of correct trials.
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
RT in the DWM
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
Reaction time in the transfer task, a delayed working memory task (DWM)
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
Number of correct trials in the DWM
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
Number of correct trials in the transfer task, a delayed working memory task (DWM)
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
GAF score
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average)
|
Global Assessment of Functioning
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average)
|
Delta Mood ratings
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
Mood changes (PANAS delta) through the PASAT performance: the positive and negative affective schedule (PANAS) will be conducted immediately before and after the PASAT performance.
The change in mood ratings (PANAS delta = PANAS pre PASAT - PANAS post PASAT) will be the outcome measure.
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
Subjective performance ratings
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
Participants will be asked to rate their performance and overall cognitive abilities on a likert scale.
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)
|
Electroencephalography (EEG) measures
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average)
|
EEG will be conducted to measure resting state oscillations and event related potentials stimulus locked to the presented feedback in the PASAT
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average)
|
Prefrontal Brain activity (NIRS)
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average)
|
Functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy will be used to measure frontal brain activity: resting state and during task performance.
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average)
|
Course of MADRS scores
Time Frame: Assessment once a week during training (week 1, 2 and 3 at day 5, 12 and 19 respectively on average) and at the follow up visits (week 5 and 17, day 31 and 110 on average)
|
Depressive Symptom severity will be measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale
|
Assessment once a week during training (week 1, 2 and 3 at day 5, 12 and 19 respectively on average) and at the follow up visits (week 5 and 17, day 31 and 110 on average)
|
Prefrontal Brain activity (NIRS) as a predictor
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average)
|
The investigators will analyze if frontal brain activity measured with NIRS during resting state and task performance can contribute to the prediction of the effectiveness of the tDCS training.
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average)
|
Electroencephalography (EEG) measures as a predictor
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average)
|
The investigators will analyze if resting state oscillations and event related potentials stimulus locked to the presented feedback in the PASAT can contribute to the prediction of the effectiveness of the tDCS training.
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average)
|
Genetic factors as predictors
Time Frame: Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average)
|
The investigators will analyze if genetic factors involved in neuroplasticity (5-HTTLPR, BDNF, COMT) can contribute to the prediction of the effectiveness of the tDCS training.
|
Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 01EE1403D-2
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Depression Unipolar
-
Brown UniversityCompletedMild-moderate Unipolar Depression; Persistent Negative AffectUnited States
-
University GhentUniversity Hospital, GhentCompleted
-
University Hospital, MontpellierAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris; University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand and other collaboratorsRecruitingUnipolar Depressed Outpatients | Mild Severity | Without Psychotic FeaturesFrance
-
Massachusetts General HospitalTakedaTerminatedDepressive Disorder | Depression | Major Depression | Depression, UnipolarUnited States
-
University of OxfordNational Institute for Health Research, United KingdomNot yet recruiting
-
The University of New South WalesUniversity of SydneyCompleted
-
University of AarhusTerminatedUnipolar DepressionDenmark
-
Norwegian Institute of Public HealthCompleted
-
University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh...Unknown
-
New York State Psychiatric InstituteCompletedUnipolar DepressionUnited States
Clinical Trials on 1mA tDCS
-
The First Hospital of Hebei Medical UniversityRecruitingHealthy Subjects | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation | Motor Evoked PotentialChina
-
Hôpital le VinatierCompletedSchizophrenia | Auditory HallucinationsFrance, Tunisia
-
Universidad de AlmeriaSecretaría General de Universidades, Investigación y Tecnología, Junta de...Enrolling by invitationSubstance-Related DisordersSpain
-
Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts General Hospital; National Institute on Aging (NIA)Unknown
-
Nachum Soroker, MDUnknown
-
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedMotor Activity | Motor NeuroplasticityUnited States
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedMigraine With Aura | CADASIL | Cerebral Microangiopathy | ICA StenosisGermany
-
Universidade Federal de PernambucoCompleted
-
Thorsten RudroffTerminatedMultiple Sclerosis | Neuropathic PainUnited States