Voiding Assessment Based on Minimum Spontaneous Void of 150 mL Compared to Retrograde Fill Method After Female Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery

January 8, 2020 updated by: Yale University

Voiding Assessment Based on Minimum Spontaneous Void of 150 mL Compared to Retrograde Fill Method After Female Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study will compare voiding assessment based on a minimum spontaneous voided volume of 150 cc with the standard retrograde fill approach in women after pelvic floor procedures.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All 18-year-old or older women who undergo surgery for urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse (POP)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who require prolonged Foley catheter or suprapubic catheter

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Spontaneous void
Subjects will not have retrograde fill of bladder, rather will be required to void 150 mL spontaneously prior to discharge.
Subjects will not have retrograde fill of bladder, rather will be required to void 150 mL spontaneously prior to discharge.
Active Comparator: Retrograde bladder fill
Subjects will have their bladder retrograde filled with 300mL of fluid prior to a voiding trial.
Subjects will have their bladder retrograde filled with 300mL of fluid prior to a voiding trial.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Failure rate
Time Frame: Up to 2 days post op
The percentage of subjects who did not meet the required voiding assessment criteria and needed catheterization .
Up to 2 days post op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
False pass rate
Time Frame: up to 30 days after discharge.
The percentage of women who initially met the voiding assessment but returned for re-catheterization due to voiding difficulty .
up to 30 days after discharge.
Force of stream (FOS)
Time Frame: Up to 2 days post op.
Patient reported force of stream (FOS) during voiding; (0 being no urination, 10 being normal strong flow).
Up to 2 days post op.
Force of stream (FOS)
Time Frame: Up to 2 days post-surgery.
Patient reported force of stream (FOS) during voiding; (0 being no urination, 10 being normal strong flow).
Up to 2 days post-surgery.
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for Voiding Assessment-method used
Time Frame: Up to 2 days post-surgery.
This question asks "How satisfied were you with the method we used to evaluate how well you could urinate after our surgery?" It is measured on a continuum from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Up to 2 days post-surgery.
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for Voiding Assessment-negative emotions
Time Frame: Up to 2 days post-surgery.
This question asks "Did you experience any negative emotions such as fear or anxiety when we were evaluating urination after our surgery?" It is measured on a continuum from 0 (many negative emotions) to 100 (no negative emotions).
Up to 2 days post-surgery.
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for Voiding Assessment-recommend method
Time Frame: Up to 2 days post-surgery.
This question asks "How likely would you be to recommend to a friend or family member, the method we used to evaluate your urination after our surgery, if they were in the same situation?" It is measured on a continuum from 0 (very unlikely) to 100 (very likely).
Up to 2 days post-surgery.
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for Voiding Assessment-convenience of method
Time Frame: Up to 2 days post-surgery.
This question asks "How convenient was the method we used to evaluate your urination after our surgery (e.g. time, ease etc.)? It is measured on a continuum from 0 (very inconvenient) to 100 (very convenient).
Up to 2 days post-surgery.
Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for Voiding Assessment-preferred method
Time Frame: Up to 2 days post-surgery.
This question asks the patient: "If it was all up to you, which It is measured on a continuum from 0 (strongly prefer backfill before catheter) to 100 (strongly prefer no backfill before catheter removal).
Up to 2 days post-surgery.
Postoperative pain score
Time Frame: One day post-surgery.
This outcome is measured by a 10-point visual analog scale where 0= no pain, 10=worst pain you have ever experienced.
One day post-surgery.
Urinary tract infection (UTI)
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post surgery.
UTI is defined as culture-proven bladder infection or, in the absence of a culture, clinical suspicion of a bladder infection that resulted in treatment.
Up to 30 days post surgery.
Post-operative complications
Time Frame: Up to 30 days post-surgery.
Post-operative complications assessed by medical record review.
Up to 30 days post-surgery.
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to 2 days post-surgery.
Length of hospital stay assessed by medical record review.
Up to 2 days post-surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Harmanli Oz, MD, Yale University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe