ECT in Ultra-resistant Schizophrenia (SURECT)

September 15, 2020 updated by: Centre Hospitalier du Rouvray

Clinical Trial Comparing Two Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) Application Schemas in Ultra-resistant Schizophrenia

The effects of the ECT in schizophrenia ultra-resistant were studied in short times (4-6 months in most studies with follow-up). The literature identified a high relapse rate of 32% in the weeks to months after ECT discontinuation. The use of the ECT in the prevention of the relapse is partially known. In an empirical way, experts recommend protocols of prevention of the relapse going from 6 to 12 months. Nevertheless, the profit of a long cure (12 months) compared with a short cure (6 months) was never determined. Therefore, the investigators decided to lead a prospective randomized controlled study in order to compare the response rates between the two strategies of clozapine and ECT combinations applied to URS patients. The treatment consisted either in a short therapy of six months or a longer course of therapy of twelve months. To the investigators' knowledge, it is the first study which compares two ECT strategies (both the short duration and the longer one) for the treatment of URS patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens
        • Contact:
          • Clelia Quiles, Md,PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Clelia Quiles, MD,PhD
      • Cadillac, France, 33410
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier de Cadillac
        • Contact:
          • Patrick Le Bihan, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patrick Le Bihan, MD
      • Caen, France, 14033
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Caen
        • Contact:
          • Pierrick LEBAIN, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pierrick Lebain, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Clément Nathou, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sonia Dollfus, MD,PhD
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • Recruiting
        • Clermont-Ferrand Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Pierre-Michel Llorca, MD, PhD
      • Montpellier, France
        • Recruiting
        • Montpellier University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Jerôme Attal, MD
      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Nantes
        • Contact:
          • Anne Sauvaget, MD,PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anne Sauvaget, MD,PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Samuel Bulteau, MD,PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Jean-Marie Vanelle, MD,PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Edouard Laforgue, MD
      • Neuilly-sur-Marne, France
        • Not yet recruiting
        • EPS Ville Evrard
        • Contact:
          • Dominique Januel, MD, PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Noomane Bouaziz, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dominique Januel, MD, PhD
      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Saint Anne
        • Contact:
          • Marie-Odile Krebs, MD,PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marie-Odile Krebs, MD,PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marion Plaze, MD
      • Poitiers, France, 86021
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit
        • Contact:
          • Nemat Jaafari, MD,PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Nemat Jaafari, Md,PhD
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Toulouse
        • Contact:
          • Christophe Arbus, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christophe Arbus, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marie Sporer, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with URS: patients who continue to experience persistent positive psychotic symptoms: item score of 4 (moderate) on at least two of four positive symptoms on the BPRS (grandiosity, suspiciousness, hallucinations and unusual thoughts), current presence of at least moderately severe illness on the total BPRS-18 (45) and a score of 4 (moderate) on the CGI-S, despite a period of clozapine therapy of at least 6 weeks with a plasma concentration of 350 ng/ml and at least two unsuccessful previous treatment trials with conventional or atypical antipsychotic drugs from two distinct families at a dose 600 mg of chlorpromazine equivalents.
  • Age: from 18 to 55
  • Patients with stable treatments for at least 8 weeks (antipsychotics, mood stabilizers and antidepressants).
  • Participants who gave their informed, written consents and agreement of their guardian for the patients under guardianship
  • Patients deprived of liberty if they gave their informed, written consents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current affective episode according to DSM-5 criteria;
  • ECT within (the last) 6 months;
  • Unstable epilepsy ; severe neurological or systemic disorder that could significantly affect cognition, behavior, or mental status (other than late dyskinesia or neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism);
  • Severe substance use disorders (other than nicotine or caffeine) according to DSM-5 criteria.
  • Concomitant use of antiepileptics and benzodiazepines apart from lamotrigine
  • Women of childbearing age with no adequate contraception, pregnant or lactating women;
  • Patients having contraindications to etomidate or any of its excipients;
  • Patients having contraindications to neuromuscular blocking agents;
  • Patients participating or having participated in an interventional clinical trial within 30 days prior to the inclusion visit;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Short ECT arm
In the short arm, bitemporal ECT is administered twice a week during the first 6 weeks. Afterwards, it is administered once a week during 4 weeks. After that, the patients will have one ECT every 3 weeks during 6 weeks. Lastly, patients will receive one ECT each month during 2 months.

Electroconvulsive therapy is administered through electrodes positioned bilaterally (for quicker efficacy) on the frontotemporal region.

The stimulation dose is determined by titration method, during the first ECT session.

The dose for therapeutic stimulation will be twice the seizure threshold. This dose may be increased as the crisis does not meet the effectiveness criteria, as is recommended.

For patients undergoing ECT, an intravenous injection of etomidate (between 0.1 and 0.7 mg/kg) and suxamethonium chloride (0.8 and 1.2 mg/kg) is performed. The required doses are adapted according to each patient by the anaesthetist and they are documented in the patients' files. A mixture of etomidate and propofol can be used in second-line or just propofol in third-line (no more than 2mg/kg).

Active Comparator: Long ECT arm
In the long arm, bitemporal ECT is administered twice a week during the first 12 weeks. Afterwards, it is administered once a week during 8 weeks. After that, the patients will have one ECT every 3 weeks during 12 weeks. Lastly, patients will receive one ECT each month during 4 months.

Electroconvulsive therapy is administered through electrodes positioned bilaterally (for quicker efficacy) on the frontotemporal region.

The stimulation dose is determined by titration method, during the first ECT session.

The dose for therapeutic stimulation will be twice the seizure threshold. This dose may be increased as the crisis does not meet the effectiveness criteria, as is recommended.

For patients undergoing ECT, an intravenous injection of etomidate (between 0.1 and 0.7 mg/kg) and suxamethonium chloride (0.8 and 1.2 mg/kg) is performed. The required doses are adapted according to each patient by the anaesthetist and they are documented in the patients' files. A mixture of etomidate and propofol can be used in second-line or just propofol in third-line (no more than 2mg/kg).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The response rate (a 30% decrease in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)) at 15th month
Time Frame: three months after the end of the treatment (i.e. 9 and 15 months)
The response rate (a 30% decrease in the PANSS, ranging from 30, the minimum, to 210, the most severe score) at 15th month
three months after the end of the treatment (i.e. 9 and 15 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The response rate (a 30% decrease in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS))
Time Frame: three months after the end of the treatment (i.e. 9 and 15 months)
The response rate (a 30% decrease in the BPRS, ranging from 18, the minimum, to 126, the most severe score) at 15th month.
three months after the end of the treatment (i.e. 9 and 15 months)
The response rate (a 30% decrease in the BPRS) at different times of the study
Time Frame: 2, 4, 6 and 12 months
The response rate (a 30 % decrease in the BPRS) at 2, 4, 6 and 12 months.
2, 4, 6 and 12 months
Response rate (a 30% decrease in the PANSS) at different times of the study
Time Frame: 2, 4, 6 and 12 months
The response rate (a 30 % decrease in the PANSS) at 2, 4, 6 and 12 months.
2, 4, 6 and 12 months
Neuropsychological assessment- MMSE
Time Frame: -1, 6 and 15 months
The scores and variations of the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) at -1, 6 and 15 months.
-1, 6 and 15 months
Neuropsychological assessment- SSTICS
Time Frame: -1, 6 and 15 months
The scores and variations of the Subjective Scale To Investigate Cognition In Schizophrenia (SSTICS, scores ranging from 0 to 84, the most severe score) at -1, 6 and 15 months.
-1, 6 and 15 months
Neuropsychological assessment- Grober and Buschke test
Time Frame: -1, 6 and 15 months
The scores and variations of the test of Grober and Buschke at -1, 6 and 15 months.
-1, 6 and 15 months
Neuropsychological assessment- test of doors
Time Frame: -1, 6 and 15 months
The scores and variations of the test of doors at -1, 6 and 15 months.
-1, 6 and 15 months
Neuropsychological assessment- test of d2
Time Frame: -1, 6 and 15 months
The scores and variations of the test of d2 at -1, 6 and 15 months.
-1, 6 and 15 months
Neuropsychological assessment - "figure de Rey" test
Time Frame: -1, 6 and 15 months
the scores ans variations of the test of " figure de Rey" at -1, 6 and 15 months.
-1, 6 and 15 months
Other clinical assessment- HAMD-21
Time Frame: day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months
The scores and variations of the Hamilton Rating Scale-21 items (HAMD-21, scores ranging from 0 to 64, the most severe score) at day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months.
day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months
Other clinical assessment-YMRS
Time Frame: day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months
The scores and variations of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS, scores ranging from 0 to 60, the most severe score) at day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months.
day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months
Other clinical assessment-GAF
Time Frame: day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months
The scores and variations of the Global Assessment Functioning (GAF, scores ranging from 0 to 100, the best score) at day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months.
day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months
Other clinical assessment-MOAS
Time Frame: day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months
The scores and variations of the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS, scores ranging from 0 to 100, the most severe score) at day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months.
day 1 and 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 15 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 4, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 4, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2020

Last Verified

September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-A02657-46

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Clinical Trials on Electroconvulsive therapy

3
Subscribe