Project Step: Evaluating Deposit Contracts and Daily Feedback to Promote Walking in Overweight and Obese Adults

The purpose of this study is to test whether deposit contracts, wherein individuals invest their own money with the study to serve as the incentive, with or without daily feedback about progress help individuals to increase step counts and more often meet a step goal compared to self-monitoring only.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Obesity; Overweight; Physical Activity; Sedentary Lifestyle
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Self-monitoring; Behavioral: Incentives; Behavioral: Feedback

Detailed Description

Approximately 68% of adults are overweight or obese, which is associated with increased risk for health conditions, including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer. These individuals are more often sedentary than the general population, which compounds the risk for these same conditions. While the benefits of engaging in physical activity are well-established, few individuals are able to successfully increase activity to recommended levels. Existing intervention programs, often derived from theories such as social cognitive theory or related theories, have had limited success. Behavioral economics offers a promising alternative, suggesting that engagement in any behavior is based on the maximizing utility and happiness. Interventions based on this theory aim to increase the immediate benefit of engaging in physical activity, often using a financial incentive.

This study will last for 16 weeks. Each participant will invest $42 with the study, and be exposed to to each of three interventions. All participants will have the use of a FitBit for ongoing self-monitoring and a step-count goal of 10,000 steps per day. In one condition, these will be the only interventions you receive. In one condition, you will receive a monetary consequence for meeting or not meeting the goal. Each day during the incentive conditions, you will be eligible to lose $0.75 of your own money for not meeting the goal, or to earn back $0.75 of your money plus $0.75 from the study (i.e., a total of $1.50) for meeting the goal. In the third condition, you will have daily feedback mid-afternoon about your distance from the goal and the money you stand to gain or lose. You will be made aware of what condition you are in.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 24
• Phase: Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• 25 kg/m2 ≤ BMI ≤ 45 kg/m2
• Age 18-70
• Currently inactive (engages in less than 6,000 steps/day on at least 4 of 7 days per week, confirmed by FitBit at baseline)
• Able to engage in moderate amount of walking
• Able to receive email/text messages from study staff

Exclusion Criteria:

- medical or psychiatric conditions that would make it difficult to comply with study protocols

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single-arm trial; All participants will undergo each of three conditions during the study.	Behavioral: Self-monitoring; Participants will have access to a wrist-worn activity monitor and have a daily step goal; Behavioral: Incentives; Participants will have a deposit contract, wherein they will lose money if a goal is not reached, or double their money if a goal is reached; Behavioral: Feedback; Participants will receive text message feedback each day about progress towards their goal

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Step counts	Daily number of steps taken	Throughout 16-week study, measured as the average of each two-week block (i.e., each time condition changes)
Goal attainment	Proportion of days step goal was met	Throughout 16-week study, measured as the average of each two-week block (i.e., each time condition changes)

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Drexel University
• Collaborators: American College of Sports Medicine; Psi Chi; Qualtrics

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Kerrigan SG, Forman EM, Patel M, Williams D, Zhang F, Crosby RD, Butryn ML. Evaluating the Feasibility, Acceptability, and Effects of Deposit Contracts With and Without Daily Feedback to Promote Physical Activity. J Phys Act Health. 2020 Jan 1;17(1):29-36. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0589.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): December 1, 2016
• Primary Completion (Actual): August 1, 2017
• Study Completion (Actual): August 8, 2017

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 12, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 20, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): June 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): June 25, 2018
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 20, 2018
• Last Verified: June 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Body Weight; Overweight
• Other Study ID Numbers: 1601004185-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No