Development and Pilot Testing of the Students With Autism Accessing General Education (SAAGE) Model (SAAGE)

November 14, 2018 updated by: Suzannah Iadarola, University of Rochester
Study personnel will use evidence based behavioral skills training procedures to coach educators to implement modules designed to increase the quality of educational services and access to inclusive settings in elementary school for students with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This project brings together the expertise of investigators at three centers to develop and conduct a pilot test of a new comprehensive intervention to increase the quality of educational services and access to inclusive settings for students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in elementary school (kindergarten through 5th grade). The intervention model, Students with Autism Accessing General Education (SAAGE), integrates evidence-based strategies to teach skills to students with ASD in schools, best practices derived from this literature by the project investigators, a recent guidebook written by the principal investigator, and research on collaboration with community providers such as school teams to implement interventions efficaciously and sustainably. SAAGE begins with strategies to help a school form a cohesive team to oversee implementation of the model in the school. For each student, SAAGE uses a modular approach for identifying goals for a student, selecting appropriate teaching strategies, and systematically monitoring progress and trouble-shooting. The modules center on core and associated features of ASD. Study personnel will use well established behavioral skills training procedures to coach educators to implement the modules.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14642
        • University of Rochester Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Children subjects:

  • Are enrolled in school grades kindergarten through 5th
  • Have an IEP educational classification of Autism, confirmed by the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, Second Edition, and DSM-5 checklist
  • No planned changes in school placement or core team members during the school year of participation

Adult subjects (teachers, para educators):

  • Instructional personnel who currently support a participating child with ASD at school (e.g., teacher, instructional assistant, speech pathologist, occupational therapist)
  • Letter from instructional personnel's district or school indicating agreement to take part in the research project

Exclusion Criteria:

Children subjects • Diagnosis of (1) genetic disorders such as Fragile X, Down syndrome, or tuberous sclerosis; 2) profound vision or hearing loss; or (3) motor disabilities such as cerebral palsy (these multiple disabilities would prevent standard implementation of the intervention protocol).

Adult subjects

• Instructional personnel whose written consent was not obtained

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention
Students with Autism Accessing General Education (SAAGE). Teaching staff work with a study team coach to identify areas of concern for individual students, create goals and implement a modular behavioral intervention using an active teaching/feedback loop model.
With study team coach support, teacher implemented modules addressing student behavioral/academic goals.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Enhanced Services As Usual
Teaching staff access in-service training sessions hosted by study team and are provided with print materials from which the modules for the active intervention were created.
Teaching staff access in-service presentations and print materials with no active study team coaching.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change in student function as measured by the Developmental Disability-Clinical Global Assessment Scale
Time Frame: baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
The Developmental Disability-Clinical Global Assessment Scale ranges from 1-100 with 100 indicating superior functioning. It assesses student function in a classroom setting.
baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change in social communication and interaction as rated by child's teacher using the 30 item Social Skills Subscale of the Social Skills Improvement System
Time Frame: baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
The Social Skills Improvement System, Social Skills Subscale is a 30 item measure of social communication and interaction using a 4 point Likert scale to rate the frequency of behaviors and a 3 point Likert scale to the the importance of each item.
baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
Mean change in restricted and repetitive behavior as measured by the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scales - PDD
Time Frame: baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
The Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scales - PDD is a modified version of the Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scales which is adapted for use with children with ASD. It is a semi structured clinician rated scale designed to rate the current severity of repetitive behavior. Each item is scored on a 5 point scale from 0 to 4 with 4 being most symptomatic.
baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
Change in teacher-nominated target behaviors
Time Frame: baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
Teacher Nominated Target Behaviors
baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
Change in on-task behavior during instruction
Time Frame: baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
Academic Engaged Time
baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
School-related adaptive functioning
Time Frame: baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
Adaptive Behavior Assessment System, Self-Direction Scale
baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
Social skills and behavior regulation
Time Frame: baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
Social Skills Improvement System
baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
Class placement
Time Frame: baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)
IEP review
baseline to end of school year (approx. 9 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tristram H Smith, PhD, University of Rochester

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 28, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

August 28, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 16, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on Students with Autism Accessing General Education

3
Subscribe