Evaluating the Impact of Improvements in Urban Green Space on Older Adults' Physical Activity and Wellbeing: a Natural Experimental Study (GHIA)

March 23, 2020 updated by: Jack Benton, University of Manchester

Background: Creating or improving urban green space has the potential to be an effective and sustainable way to increase physical activity and improve other aspects of wellbeing in older adults. However, the size and quality of the existing evidence base is weak. There is particularly a lack of studies on older adults and in the United Kingdom. This study aims to evaluate the effect of four small local street greening intervention projects on older adults' physical activity and wellbeing over a one-year period. The street greening includes tree and flower planting, and artificial tree decorations. These projects are based in a deprived urban neighbourhood in Greater Manchester, United Kingdom.

Methods: Eight unimproved comparison sites were selected to compare with the intervention sites. The researchers will measure physical activity and two other behavioural indicators of wellbeing (Connect: connecting with other people; and Take Notice: taking notice of the environment) using a newly developed observation tool. It is thought that the largest effect of the interventions will be on Take Notice behaviour due to improvements in the aesthetic quality of green space at the intervention sites. Baseline data collection occurred in September 2017 before the interventions were installed in November 2017. Follow-up data collection will be repeated in February/ March 2018 (6 months) and September 2018 (12 months).

Discussion: The present study offers a rare opportunity to evaluate the before-and-after effects of small-scale changes in urban green space, in an understudied population (older adults) and setting (United Kingdom). Although the interventions are expected to have small effects on peoples' behaviour, this study will address key weaknesses in previous studies.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Greater Manchester
      • Multiple Locations, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom, Various
        • Greater Manchester

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study is focused on older adults and therefore primary analyses will only consider data from older adults. Secondary analyses will consider data from adults.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

° All individuals (infants, children, teens, adults, older adults) entering the target area during observation periods

Exclusion Criteria:

° Any individuals that request their data to be removed from the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention site 1
2 planted trees; bulb planting
The interventions are located on four publicly accessible sites; the total size of the floor area of green space in each of the intervention sites is small, ranging from 0.09 to 0.35 acres. Components of the interventions include tree and flower planting (expected to bloom by March 2018) and artificial tree decorations such as strings of small electric lights and tree socks (the interventions are hereafter collectively referred to as urban street greening). The total cost for all components across all four intervention sites is approximately £6,000, although this excludes artist fees connected to the project. All components of the interventions were implemented within a one week period in November 2017 by two arborists, two local artists, staff members at Southway Housing Trust, and local community members from Old Moat and a local school.
Comparison site 1A
Comparison site 1B
Intervention site 2
12 planted trees; bulb planting; artificial tree decorations (string lights)
The interventions are located on four publicly accessible sites; the total size of the floor area of green space in each of the intervention sites is small, ranging from 0.09 to 0.35 acres. Components of the interventions include tree and flower planting (expected to bloom by March 2018) and artificial tree decorations such as strings of small electric lights and tree socks (the interventions are hereafter collectively referred to as urban street greening). The total cost for all components across all four intervention sites is approximately £6,000, although this excludes artist fees connected to the project. All components of the interventions were implemented within a one week period in November 2017 by two arborists, two local artists, staff members at Southway Housing Trust, and local community members from Old Moat and a local school.
Comparison site 2A
Comparison site 2B
Intervention site 3
3 planted trees; artificial tree decorations (string lights, tree socks)
The interventions are located on four publicly accessible sites; the total size of the floor area of green space in each of the intervention sites is small, ranging from 0.09 to 0.35 acres. Components of the interventions include tree and flower planting (expected to bloom by March 2018) and artificial tree decorations such as strings of small electric lights and tree socks (the interventions are hereafter collectively referred to as urban street greening). The total cost for all components across all four intervention sites is approximately £6,000, although this excludes artist fees connected to the project. All components of the interventions were implemented within a one week period in November 2017 by two arborists, two local artists, staff members at Southway Housing Trust, and local community members from Old Moat and a local school.
Comparison site 3A
Comparison site 3B
Intervention site 4
8 planted trees; bulb planting; artificial tree decorations (string lights, tree socks)
The interventions are located on four publicly accessible sites; the total size of the floor area of green space in each of the intervention sites is small, ranging from 0.09 to 0.35 acres. Components of the interventions include tree and flower planting (expected to bloom by March 2018) and artificial tree decorations such as strings of small electric lights and tree socks (the interventions are hereafter collectively referred to as urban street greening). The total cost for all components across all four intervention sites is approximately £6,000, although this excludes artist fees connected to the project. All components of the interventions were implemented within a one week period in November 2017 by two arborists, two local artists, staff members at Southway Housing Trust, and local community members from Old Moat and a local school.
Comparison site 4A
Comparison site 4B

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Take Notice behaviour
Time Frame: 12 months
The primary outcome will be a count per observation period of Take Notice behaviour at 12 months. Take Notice behaviour is the primary outcome because the interventions are expected to improve the aesthetic quality of green space by providing visual information of value to users, thus causing more overt appreciation in the intervention sites.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Take Notice behaviour
Time Frame: 6 months
The investigators will also assess a count per observation period of Take Notice behaviour at 6 months.
6 months
Overall count of older adults
Time Frame: 6 months
The secondary outcome will be the overall count of older adults per observation period.
6 months
Overall count of older adults
Time Frame: 12 months
The secondary outcome will be the overall count of older adults per observation period.
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sedentary behaviour
Time Frame: 6 months
Additional exploratory analyses will assess a count per observation period separately for each physical activity level (Sedentary, Walking, Vigorous) and Connect behaviour.
6 months
Sedentary behaviour
Time Frame: 12 months
Additional exploratory analyses will assess a count per observation period separately for each physical activity level (Sedentary, Walking, Vigorous) and Connect behaviour.
12 months
Walking behaviour
Time Frame: 6 months
Additional exploratory analyses will assess a count per observation period separately for each physical activity level (Sedentary, Walking, Vigorous) and Connect behaviour.
6 months
Walking behaviour
Time Frame: 12 months
Additional exploratory analyses will assess a count per observation period separately for each physical activity level (Sedentary, Walking, Vigorous) and Connect behaviour.
12 months
Vigorous physical activity
Time Frame: 6 months
Additional exploratory analyses will assess a count per observation period separately for each physical activity level (Sedentary, Walking, Vigorous) and Connect behaviour.
6 months
Vigorous physical activity
Time Frame: 12 months
Additional exploratory analyses will assess a count per observation period separately for each physical activity level (Sedentary, Walking, Vigorous) and Connect behaviour.
12 months
Connect behaviour
Time Frame: 6 months
Additional exploratory analyses will assess a count per observation period separately for each physical activity level (Sedentary, Walking, Vigorous) and Connect behaviour.
6 months
Connect behaviour
Time Frame: 12 months
Additional exploratory analyses will assess a count per observation period separately for each physical activity level (Sedentary, Walking, Vigorous) and Connect behaviour.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 21, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 21, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There are no individual participant data

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity and Wellbeing

Clinical Trials on Urban street greening

Subscribe