Intraarticular Injection of Tranexamic Acid Reduced Postoperative Hemarthrosis in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Intraarticular Injection of Tranexamic Acid Reduced Postoperative Hemarthrosis in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction - A Prospective Randomized Study

Post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) hemarthrosis may result in increased pain thus delaying postoperative rehabilitation, which may eventually lead to arthrofibrosis and a functional deficit. Many antifibrinolytic agents, including tranexamic acid (TXA), have been used in orthopedic surgeries to reduce postoperative bleeding.The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of intra-articular injection of TXA in patients receiving arthroscopic ACLRs. Patients were randomized into two groups. Group 1 patients (TXA group) received the index procedures with a 10 mL intra-articular injection of TXA. Group 2 (control group) patients received the index procedures without TXA injections. An intra-articular suction drain was placed recorded 24 h postoperatively. Clinical evaluations using an IKDC functional score, range of motion (ROM), and a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score were performed at postoperative day 3 and week 4.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

TXA group patients received ACLRs and a 10 mL intra-articular injection of TXA after the procedure. The control group patients only received ACLRs without TXA injections. Randomization was done on the day of the surgery, by an independent investigator who did not participate in the surgery, using the permuted block randomization technique.

The same surgeon treated all patients enrolled in this study. Spinal anesthesia was given to all patients and a pneumatic tourniquet was routinely used. In brief, through a 3 cm incision over the medial proximal tibia, semitendinosus (ST) and gracilis (Gr) tendons were harvested from the distal insertion. Tendons were quadrupled and whip stitched by No. 2 and No. 5 Ethibond sutures (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). The diameters of the folded tendons were determined by using sizing cylinders with incremental size changes of 0.5 mm.The femoral sockets were created at about the 1:30 position (left knee), through the anteromedial portal. The tibial tunnel was created with an ACUFEX guide (Smith & Nephew, Andover, MA). The diameters of the socket were created in the same manner as the diameter of the folded graft. At tibial site, grafts were fixed with bioscrews (BIORCI-HA, Smith & Nephew) at 30 degrees of knee flexion. The screw and the tunnel sizes were the same. After completion of the procedure, a suction drain (Zimmer HEMOVAC, Warsaw, IN) was placed at the superior lateral aspect of the joint. Ten mL of TXA (100 mg/mL) (Daiichi Sankyo, Tokyo, Japan) was injected into the joint at the end of the operation and the drain was clamped for 2 h.

Clinical evaluations The volume of drainage was recorded 24 h after surgery. The grade of hemarthrosis, as previously described by Coupens et al.,was also documented at day 3 and week The range of knee motion and the IKDC functional score were evaluated 4 weeks post-surgery. The VAS was documented at postoperative day 3 and week 4.

Statistical analysis. All data are expressed as a mean and standard deviation (SD). The amount of drainage or functional scores between different groups were compared with an independent t test.

All statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 11.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago,IL). Differences were considered significant when the p-value was < 0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

320

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Hsiao-Li

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. patient agreed to participate in this study, signed an informed consent document.
  2. patients receiving arthroscopic ACLR with autologous hamstring grafts

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. previous knee procedures on the same side
  2. renal disorder or insufficiency
  3. abnormal coagulation profile
  4. refused to participate in this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Tranexamic Acid group
Ten mL of TXA (100 mg/mL) was injected into the joint at the end of the index operation and the drain was clamped for 2 h.
Ten mL of Tranexamic Acid(100 mg/mL) was injected into the joint at the end of the operation.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Control Group
The control group patients only received ACLRs without TXA injections.
Post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The volume of drainage
Time Frame: 24 hours after surgery.
hemoarthrosis
24 hours after surgery.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The grade of hemarthrosis
Time Frame: At day 3 and week 4.
Grade I to IV.
At day 3 and week 4.
The VAS was documented
Time Frame: Postoperative day 3 and week 4.
scale 0 to 10.
Postoperative day 3 and week 4.
IKDC functional score
Time Frame: Evaluated 4 weeks post-surgery.
Evaluated 4 weeks post-surgery.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 26, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe