InTSHA: Interactive Transition Support for HIV-infected Adolescents Using Social Media (InTSHA)

September 27, 2023 updated by: Brian Zanoni, Emory University
The goal of this study is to develop and evaluate a social media behavioral intervention based on the Social-ecological Model of Adolescent and Young Adult Readiness to Transition (SMART) to improve transition care for adolescents living with HIV in South Africa. Participants will be randomized to receive the social media intervention or the standard of care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

South Africa has the highest burden of adolescents living with HIV in the world and adolescents are poorly prepared for transition from pediatric to adult services. For a large majority of South Africans living with HIV, ART was not available until 2004. This delay contributed to nearly 500,000 perinatal HIV infections in the late 1990s and early 2000s. With large scale-up and improved access to ART in recent years, survivors of perinatal HIV infection are now reaching adolescence and beyond. As the wave of perinatally HIV-infected adolescents matures, an estimated 320,000 adolescents will transfer from pediatric- or adolescent-based clinics to adult services in the next 10 years in South Africa. Currently, perinatally HIV-infected adolescents enter adult care at variable ages and developmental stages, without necessary preparation or support through the process. This study will develop and evaluate an innovative intervention designed to address this critical problem.

The SMART model incorporates modifiable factors such as knowledge, skills/self-efficacy, relationships and social support that can be targets of interventions to improve transition care. Medical care during adolescence is typically complicated by increased risk-taking behavior, as well as decreased caregiver involvement, which occur during a time of rapid physical, emotional, and cognitive development. When adolescents transition to adult care, they often do not receive the coordinated services that they received under pediatric care. Qualitative studies with adolescents and clinicians from sub-Saharan Africa suggest that peer support, collaboration with health providers, and communication between adult and pediatric providers might assist in transition to adult services. The SMART model emphasizes eight modifiable factors, three key stakeholders (adolescents, caregivers, and clinicians) and their interconnected relationship in influencing successful transition to adult care.The social media intervention for this study incorporates these stakeholders and addresses the modifiable factors in the SMART model to improve transition care for adolescents living with HIV.

Social media is defined as internet-based applications that allow the creation and exchange of user generated content. A recent meta-analysis found that social support was the most common reason for patients to use social media for health purposes. Social media has also been used to improve the relationship between caregivers and patients when switching caregivers, a major barrier to transition for adolescents in South Africa. Although results vary in different settings, a recent meta-analysis has shown overall improved adherence and viral suppression among adults living with HIV using social media based health services technology. Social media can address the modifiable variables in the SMART model such as knowledge, self-efficacy, goals, relationships, peer and social support, which could ultimately improve virologic suppression and retention in care during the transition to adult services.

The researchers will perform a pilot randomized controlled trial with 40 adolescents receiving the social media intervention and 40 adolescents receiving standard of care. In-depth interviews and quantitative surveys with adolescents living with HIV will be used to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. The secondary outcomes of peer support, connection to clinical staff, retention in care, and viral suppression will also be examined at baseline and 6 months after randomization.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Westville, South Africa
        • University of KwaZulu-Natal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 19 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 15 to 19 years
  • Perinatally HIV-infected
  • Receiving ART for at least 6 months
  • Fully aware of their HIV status

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to read and/or speak English or Zulu
  • Severe mental or physical illness preventing informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Social Media Intervention
Adolescent HIV-positive participants receiving the social media intervention.
The social media intervention is a behavioral intervention developed by the study investigators and is delivered via mobile phones. The intervention uses the Social-ecological Model of Adolescent and Young Adult Readiness to Transition (SMART) model, highlighting modifiable targets of intervention that can be addressed through a social media platform. The SMART model incorporates modifiable factors such as knowledge, skills/self-efficacy, relationships and social support that can be targets of interventions to improve transition care. The SMART model emphasizes eight modifiable factors, three key stakeholders (adolescents, caregivers, and clinicians) and their interconnected relationship in influencing successful transition to adult care. The intervention is designed to overcome barriers and enhance facilitators to transitioning care among adolescents living with HIV who are transitioning to adult care in South Africa.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Adolescent HIV-positive participants receiving the standard of care.
Standard of care transition from pediatric to adult care for HIV.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of Intervention Measure Score
Time Frame: Month 6
The acceptability score is based on a validated acceptability questionnaire, the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (Proctor et al., 2011). Acceptability of the intervention is assessed with 4 questions rated on a 5-point scale, where 1 = completely disagree and 5 = completely agree. The total score is the average of item scores and ranges from 1 to 5 with higher scores indicating greater acceptability of the InTSHA intervention.
Month 6
Number of Participants Completing Intervention Sessions
Time Frame: Up to Month 6
Feasibility of the intervention is reported as the number of participants randomized to the InTSHA intervention who participated in 8 to 10 sessions, 5 to 7 sessions, or fewer than 5 sessions.
Up to Month 6

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale (CASSS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
Social support from peers is assessed using 10 items of the Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale (friend support subscale). Responses are given on a 6-point scale where 1 = never and 6 = always. Total scores range from 10 to 60, where higher scores represent greater social support from peers. The change from baseline is calculated as the Month 6 score minus the Baseline score. A positive value means that the scores at Month 6 increased from what they were at Baseline.
Baseline, Month 6
Change in Connection to Clinic Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
A modified version of the Working Alliance Inventory is used to measure how connected participants feel to the clinical staff and medical team. Ten items are responded to on a 4-point scale where 0 = strongly disagree and 3 = strongly agree. Total scores range from 0 to 30 where higher scores indicate increased feelings of connection with clinical staff. The change from baseline is calculated as the Month 6 score minus the baseline score. A positive value means that the scores at Month 6 increased from what they were at baseline.
Baseline, Month 6
Number of Participants Retained in Care
Time Frame: Up to Month 6
Retention in care is assessed as a composite outcome of missing any pharmacy refills of antiretroviral medication and/or missing any clinic visits in the last 6 months. Participants are considered as retained in care if they did not miss any pharmacy refills or clinic visits.
Up to Month 6
HIV Viral Suppression
Time Frame: Month 6
HIV-1 viral load is measured in copies per milliliter (mL) and viral suppression is considered <200 copies/mL.
Month 6

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
The Rosenberg's Self-Esteem Scale is a 10-item instrument assessing self-esteem. Responses are given on a 4-point scale where 0 = strongly disagree and 3 = strongly agree. Total scores range 0 to 30 and higher scores indicate greater self-esteem. The change in score is the Month 6 score subtracted by the Baseline score. A positive values indicates that the self-esteem score increased by the end of the study.
Baseline, Month 6
Change in HIV Adolescent Readiness for Transition Scale (HARTS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6
The HIV Adolescent Readiness for Transition Scale (HARTS) includes 16 items that are responded to on a 5-point scale where 0 = no, 1 = no, but I am learning, 2 = yes, a little bit, 3 = yes, almost always, and 4 = yes, always. Total scores range from 0 to 64 and higher scores indicate greater readiness to transition to adult care. The change from baseline is calculated as the Month 6 score minus the Baseline score. A positive value means that the scores at Month 6 increased from what they were at Baseline.
Baseline, Month 6

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brian C Zanoni, MD, Emory University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

August 4, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 8, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB00116921
  • K23MH114771 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified individual participant data will be available on request and will include demographic data, age, sex, baseline cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4), viral load, results of baseline and end of study questionnaires on transition readiness, self-esteem, social support, connection to clinic and end points of acceptability, feasibility, retention in care and viral suppression.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Individual participant data will be made available for sharing beginning after publication of this study, with no end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests for sharing the data are made by contacting Dr. Zanoni. A data sharing agreement is required before data can be accessed.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe