Patient-controlled Sedation Versus Target-controlled Infusion in Orthopaedic Surgery Under Central Neuraxial Block

Propofol Sedation in Orthopaedic Surgery Under Central Neuraxial Block: Patient-controlled Sedation Versus Target-controlled Infusion

Orthopaedic surgeries involving the legs can be done under nerve block, where patients will be numb of pain at the operated site but awake during surgery. Sedation can be given to allay anxiety and provide comfort throughout the surgery. Sedation can be given by the anaesthetic doctors by using target-comtrolled infusion pump, or self-administered by patients by means of specialised machines. This study compares two method of administration of sedation, patient-controlled sedation (PCS) versus target-controlled infusion sedation (TCIS) by anaesthetic doctors, in people undergoing orthopaedic surgeries under nerve block.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Patient-controlled Sedation
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: patient-controlled sedation

Detailed Description

Central neuraxial block (CNB) is one of the mainstays of anaesthesia methods in various disciplines particularly orthopaedic surgeries. However the state of consciousness can potentially cause patient anxiety thus sedation is often utilized as a mean to improve patient satisfaction and increase patient acceptance of CNB.

Conventionally, the anaesthesiologist administers sedatives for the patients. Propofol is the commonly used drug for sedation due to its favourable pharmacokinetic profile, which results in fast induction, easy control of depth of sedation and rapid recovery. It can be infused by using target-controlled infusion (TCI) devices where the anaesthetists titrates propofol by setting desired target plasma and effect site concentration. However it is difficult to judge precisely patient requirements for adequate patient sedation, comfort and analgesia as patients' needs differ.

Patient-controlled sedation (PCS) is a valid option, initially adapted from post surgery patient-controlled analgesia. It allows patients to titrate sedative medication to their comfort and therefore present an option that addresses the needs of patients with strong desire to maintain sense of control during procedures.

This study was designed to compare total propofol requirement between PCS versus TCI sedation (TCIS), complications and patient satisfaction, in patients undergoing lower limb orthopaedic surgery under CNB.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 78
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Malaysia
  • Kuala Lumpur
    • Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 56000
      • Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II.
2. Aged 18-65 years.
3. Elective lower limb orthopaedic surgery under CNB anticipated to last for 1.5 to 2 hours

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30kg/m2
2. Unable to cooperate (eg. mental disorders, language barrier)
3. Drug abuse
4. Alcoholism (chronic daily alcohol intake greater than 75 g of pure alcohol for ≥ 2 years, where 75g of alcohol = 5 cans of beer, 1 bottle of wine or half a pint of distilled spirit)
5. Contraindications to the study drugs
6. Pregnancy
7. Significant pulmonary or cardiovascular diseases, including obstructive sleep apnoea and obesity hypoventilation syndrome
8. Features of difficult airway

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group PCS; Patients in Group PCS (patient-controlled sedation) received intravenous (IV) propofol via a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) infusion pump. The machine was set to deliver a demand bolus dose of 0.25 mg/kg with 1-minute lockout interval, without basal infusion.The patient was instructed to press on a hand-held device as often as required, to achieve their desired level of comfort or sedation.	Other: patient-controlled sedation; Patient-controlled propofol boluses for patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery under central neuraxial block
Active Comparator: Group TCIS; Patients in Group TCIS (target-controlled infusion sedation) received IV propofol via a target-controlled infusion (TCI) pump, targeted at an initial effect site concentration (Cet) of 0.6 μg/ml, using the Schnider pharmacokinetic model. Upon attainment of 0.6 μg/ml Cet, the patient's sedation level was assessed. The Cet was increased or reduced accordingly by 0.2 μg/ml to attain an OAA/S score of 3.	Other: patient-controlled sedation; Patient-controlled propofol boluses for patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery under central neuraxial block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
total propofol requirement between PCS versus TCI sedation (TCIS)	Total propofol requirement in both groups was calculated in mg/kg/hour.	Assessed from the beginning to the end of sedation, at the average of 120 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Patient satisfaction assessed by a 10-point numerical scale	Assessed using a 10-point verbal numerical rating scale (1 to 10), where 1 was regarded as extremely dissatisfied and 10 extremely satisfied.	Within one hour after recovery from sedation
Complications including incidence of hypotension, bradycardia, hypopnea, oxygen desaturation and over sedation	Documented as Yes or No for each specified complication	Assessed from the beginning to the end of sedation, at the average of 120 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Nadia Md Nor, MMED(Anaes), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Wahlen BM, Kilian M, Schuster F, Muellenbach R, Roewer N, Kranke P. Patient-controlled versus continuous anesthesiologist-controlled sedation using propofol during regional anesthesia in orthopedic procedures--a pilot study. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Nov;9(16):2733-9. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.16.2733.
• Ekin A, Donmez F, Taspinar V, Dikmen B. Patient-controlled sedation in orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia: a new approach in procedural sedation. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2013 Sep-Oct;63(5):410-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2012.07.012.
• Singh T, Ravishankar M. Conscious sedation with propofol for surgeries under spinal anaesthesia: anaesthesiologist versus patient controlled. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 21:169-173, 2005.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): June 22, 2017
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 3, 2018
• Study Completion (Actual): May 3, 2018

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: August 1, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 23, 2018
• First Posted (Actual): August 27, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): August 27, 2018
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 23, 2018
• Last Verified: August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: FF-2017-265

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No