Dose Individualization of Pemetrexed - IMPROVE-II (IMPROVE-II)

May 9, 2022 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Individualized Pemetrexed Dosing in Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Mesothelioma Based on Renal Function to Improve Treatment Response

Rationale:

Pemetrexed is a multi-targeted folate antagonist, which is primarily indicated for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and mesothelioma. Dosing of cytotoxic agents like pemetrexed requires balancing the dual risk of sub-therapy and toxicity. Administration of pemetrexed to patients with a creatinine clearance <45 ml/min is currently not advised. Pemetrexed is dosed based on body surface area (BSA), while renal function and dose are the sole determinants for systemic exposure. This causes 3 major issues:

  1. In patients with renal dysfunction, BSA-based dosing may lead to haematological toxicity
  2. Patients have to discontinue treatment due to declining renal function, and are withheld effective treatment
  3. Even in patients with adequate renal function (GFR >45 ml/min) treatment may be improved by individualized dosing based on renal function, resulting in less toxicity. Also, BSA-based dosing may lead to ineffective therapy in patients with above average renal function.

The investigators aim to address these problems.

Objective: The overall main objective is to develop a safe and effective individualized dosing regimen for pemetrexed.

Study design: IMPROVE-II is an open label, double arm, randomized study to compare renal function-based dosing of pemetrexed versus BSA-based dosing on attainment of therapeutic exposure.

Study population: IMPROVE-II includes 94 patients with NSCLC or mesothelioma that are eligible for pemetrexed treatment.

Intervention: patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to Arm A (BSA-based dosing according drug label) or to Arm B (renal function based dosing). The renal function-based dose will be calculated to reach the target AUC. Pharmacokinetic assessment after administration will be performed after the first pemetrexed dose in both arms.

Main study endpoints: The fraction (percentage) of patients with attainment of therapeutic exposure with BSA-based dosing versus renal function-based dosing.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:

The investigators consider the extra burden from participating in the planned studies limited. The extra interventions compared to routine care, consist of sampling extra blood. The pharmacokinetic assessments require placement of one additional intravenous catheter. To ensure minimal impact of study participation on daily life, a limited sampling strategy will be used. Patients may benefit from participating in IMPROVE I and -II, as they will be treated with a potentially safe and effective drug that is dosed individually, which prevents toxic exposure.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • 's-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands
        • Jeroen Bosch Hospital
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • Maastricht University Medical Centre
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Radboud university medical centre
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Erasmus University Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ≥18 years old
  2. Eligible for treatment with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy
  3. Creatinine clearance >45ml/min
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score of 0-2
  5. Subject is able and willing to sign the Informed Consent Form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Conditions that affect haemostasis in a way that blood drawing is complicated (to be assessed by physician)
  2. Contraindications for treatment with pemetrexed in line with the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) (except for creatinine clearance <45 ml/min in IMPROVE-I)

    1. Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients
    2. Pregnancy or lactation
    3. Concomitant yellow fever vaccine
  3. The presence of clinically relevant pharmacokinetic interactions, according to the current SmPC

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm A (BSA-based dosing)
Dosing of pemetrexed is based on BSA according drug label
Dosing is either based on BSA or renal function
Experimental: Arm B (renal function based dosing)
Dosing of pemetrexed is based on renal function, calculated to reach the target AUC.
Dosing is either based on BSA or renal function

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exposure (AUC)
Time Frame: 24 hours
mg*h/l
24 hours
The fraction (percentage) of patients with attainment of therapeutic exposure with BSA-based dosing versus renal function-based dosing.
Time Frame: 3 months
The fraction (percentage) of patients with attainment of therapeutic exposure defined as an AUC of 164 mg*h/l ±25%, with pemetrexed dosing based on renal function versus BSA-based dosing.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Population Intercompartmental Clearance (Q)
Time Frame: 3 months
L/h
3 months
Population Peripheral Volume of Distribution (V2)
Time Frame: 3 months
L
3 months
Performance of different renal function algorithms to predict pemetrexed pharmacokinetics (decrease in variability)
Time Frame: 3 months
Decrease in clearance variablity (%)
3 months
The incidence of hematologic dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and adverse events, as measured with the CTCAE V4'
Time Frame: 3 months
through listing
3 months
The incidence of non-hematologic dose limiting toxicities (DLT) and adverse events, as measured with the CTCAE V4
Time Frame: 3 months
through listing
3 months
The incidence of toxicity-related dose reductions, treatment delays and treatment discontinuation
Time Frame: 3 months
through listing
3 months
Quality of life measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30/L13 questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months
0-100 scale
3 months
Population Clearance (Cl)
Time Frame: 3 months
L/h
3 months
Population Central Volume of Distribution (V1)
Time Frame: 24 hours
L
24 hours
Performance of different renal function algorithms to predict pemetrexed
Time Frame: 3 months
Significant change in objective function value (OFV) (<3.84 with 1 degree of freedom)
3 months
Hematologic assessment during dosing based on renal function in patients with a creatinine clearance >45ml/min versus dosing based on BSA.
Time Frame: 5 days
Complete blood count (no per liter)
5 days
In silico evaluation of neutropenic response
Time Frame: 1 year
Simulation of risk for neutropenic response
1 year
Neutropenia related costs
Time Frame: 1 year
Euros
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rob ter Heine, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe