- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03678805
The Effect of Surgical Interventions to Assist Orthodontic Movement of Impacted Maxillary Canines
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Minimally-invasive Surgically-assisted Withdrawal of Palatally Impacted Maxillary Canines in Terms of Movement Velocity and Dento-alveolar Changes: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic, DM20AM18
- Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Palatal or Mid-alveolar impacted canine.
- There is no previous orthodontic treatment.
- Healthy periodontal tissues and good oral health (i.e., Plaque Index is less or equal to 1 according to Loe and Silness(1963)).
- No consumption of any drug that may interfere with the tooth movement (Cortisone, NSAIDs, …).
- Mild or no crowding in the upper jaw.
- No history of previous trauma to the maxillofacial region or surgical interventions.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any systemic diseases that would affect tooth movement
- Antidepressant prevents oral surgery
- Any congenital syndromes or cleft lip and palate cases
- Bad oral health
- Previous orthodontic treatment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Acceleration
The impacted canines will undergo acceleration by corticotomy accompanied with traditional traction techniques.
|
Perforations in the areas close to the impacted canines will be performed in order to accelerate tooth movement.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Traditional Traction
Traditional traction will be employed in this group of patients with impacted canines. Traditional withdrawal techniques will be used. |
The impacted canines will be withdrawn using elastic modules.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Duration of Canine Traction
Time Frame: The required time (in days) to achieve complete alignment of the impacted canine will be calculated which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group
|
The time required in days will be calculated from the beginning of canine traction till the end of canine alignment in its place in the dental arch.
|
The required time (in days) to achieve complete alignment of the impacted canine will be calculated which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group
|
Change in Canine Location in the Axial View
Time Frame: T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
|
The distance between the cusp tip of the impacted canine to the palatal mid-line in the axial view using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
|
T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
|
Change in Canine Inclination in the Coronal View
Time Frame: T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
|
The mesiodistal inclination of the impacted canine will be calculated which is the angle between the long axis of the impacted canine and the mid-sagittal plane in the coronal view of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
|
T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
|
Change in the Canine Inclination in the Sagittal View
Time Frame: T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
|
The labiopalatal inclination of the impacted canine: will be calculated which is the angle between the long axis of the impacted canine and a line perpendicular to the horizontal plane in the sagittal view of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
|
T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
|
Change in the 3D Canine Location
Time Frame: T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
|
The vertical distance from the cusp tip of the impacted canine to the upper occlusion plane is measured using the 3D volumetric rendered model of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
|
T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
|
Relation to adjacent teeth
Time Frame: Just one day before the beginning of treatment
|
The contact between the impacted canine and the central and/or the lateral incisor will be evaluated by looking at the shortest distance between the impacted canine crown and the adjacent incisors' roots This will be done using sequential axial views on the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging.
|
Just one day before the beginning of treatment
|
Change in the Absorption to the adjacent roots
Time Frame: T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
|
Absorption of adjacent roots will be evaluated as follows: In the axial views: an estimation of root damage will be taken into account and will be combined with an estimation of the vertical root damage using 3D volumetric rendered models and then will be classified into one of the four categories Class I: cementum involvement only and located at the apical third of the root Class II: involvement reaching the dentin but vertically less than one-third of the root length. Class III: involvement reaching the dentin and partially the pulp but still vertically less than one-third of the root length. Class IV: involvement reaching the root pulp and damaging more than one third of the root length vertically. |
T1: one day before the beginning of treatment; T2: at the end of the traction stage which is expected to occur within 10-12 months in the traditional group and 7-8 months in the accelerated group.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Sebaoun JD, Surmenian J, Dibart S. [Accelerated orthodontic treatment with piezocision: a mini-invasive alternative to conventional corticotomies]. Orthod Fr. 2011 Dec;82(4):311-9. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2011142. Epub 2011 Nov 23. French.
- Fischer TJ. Orthodontic treatment acceleration with corticotomy-assisted exposure of palatally impacted canines. Angle Orthod. 2007 May;77(3):417-20. doi: 10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0417:OTAWCE]2.0.CO;2.
- Sukh R, Singh GP, Tandon P. Interdisciplinary approach for the management of bilaterally impacted maxillary canines. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Oct;5(4):539-44. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.142828.
- Shastri D, Nagar A, Tandon P. Alignment of palatally impacted canine with open window technique and modified K-9 spring. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014 Apr;5(2):272-4. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.132362.
- Baccetti T, Leonardi M, Armi P. A randomized clinical study of two interceptive approaches to palatally displaced canines. Eur J Orthod. 2008 Aug;30(4):381-5. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn023. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
- Leonardi M, Armi P, Franchi L, Baccetti T. Two interceptive approaches to palatally displaced canines: a prospective longitudinal study. Angle Orthod. 2004 Oct;74(5):581-6. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2004)0742.0.CO;2.
- Walker L, Enciso R, Mah J. Three-dimensional localization of maxillary canines with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Oct;128(4):418-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.033.
- Smailiene D, Kavaliauskiene A, Pacauskiene I, Zasciurinskiene E, Bjerklin K. Palatally impacted maxillary canines: choice of surgical-orthodontic treatment method does not influence post-treatment periodontal status. A controlled prospective study. Eur J Orthod. 2013 Dec;35(6):803-10. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs102. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
- Alqerban A, Jacobs R, van Keirsbilck PJ, Aly M, Swinnen S, Fieuws S, Willems G. The effect of using CBCT in the diagnosis of canine impaction and its impact on the orthodontic treatment outcome. J Orthod Sci. 2014 Apr;3(2):34-40. doi: 10.4103/2278-0203.132911.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UDDS-Ortho-19 -2018
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Impaction of Tooth
-
Dr. Joseph GriffinCompletedCerumen Impaction of Both EarsUnited States
-
Orion Corporation, Orion PharmaCompletedCerumen Impaction of Both EarsLithuania
-
National Taiwan University HospitalEnrolling by invitationEfficacy and Safety of Articaine and Lidocaine in Extraction of Wisdom Teeth of Upper and Lower JawsDental Impaction | Wisdom ToothTaiwan
-
HL Healthcare LtdAKRN Scientific Consulting, S.L.Completed
-
Hospital Authority, Hong KongUnknownCerumen Impaction of Both EarsHong Kong
-
University of MilanCompleted
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenKarolinska Institutet; The University of Hong Kong; University of Copenhagen; Palacky...Not yet recruiting
-
National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research...RecruitingTooth Diseases | Diseases | Tooth | Stomatognatic | Tooth ImpactionUnited States
-
Yuzuncu Yıl UniversityCompletedTooth Diseases | Tooth ImpactionTurkey
Clinical Trials on Corticotomy
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedClass II Division 1 MalocclusionSyrian Arab Republic
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedClass II Division 1 MalocclusionSyrian Arab Republic
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedMalocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1Syrian Arab Republic
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedClass II Division 1 MalocclusionSyrian Arab Republic
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedClass II Div 1 Malocclusion | Protrusion, IncisorSyrian Arab Republic
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedImpacted Tooth With Abnormal PositioningSyrian Arab Republic
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedImpacted CanineSyrian Arab Republic
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedClass II Division 1 MalocclusionSyrian Arab Republic
-
Semmelweis UniversityNSK Europe GmbHEnrolling by invitation
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted