Use of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Biofeedback for Cancer Survivors

Use of Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Biofeedback for Symptom Management Among Cancer Survivors: Pilot Intervention

Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-B) is a complementary, non-pharmacologic therapy that is being tested to see if it can help cancer survivors reduce their symptoms of pain, stress, insomnia, fatigue, or depression. HRV-B is an interactive procedure in which participants relax and breathe regularly while watching the a computer screen. The computer screen provides feedback that helps people increase their heart rate variability.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Cancer
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Biofeedback

Detailed Description

Cancer survivors often suffer from prolonged and persistent symptom clusters that can include: pain, stress, depression, fatigue, and insomnia; symptoms that have each been associated with inflammation. The number of cancer survivors in the United States is expected to triple by the year 2030. Thus, there is a compelling need to develop and refine effective methods to promote high quality cancer survivorship. Dysregulation of autonomic function is a key pathophysiological 'common denominator' whereby many cancer-related symptoms likely converge. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a valid, noninvasive measure of autonomic function with established pathological and psychophysiological attributes. Reduced HRV is a known mortality risk factor, and about 80% of advanced cancer patients exhibit autonomic dysregulation. Cancer survivors with reduced HRV have increased mortality risk relative to those with normal HRV. HRV biofeedback (HRV-B) is an interactive procedure whereby patients learn to increase HRV and restore autonomic balance. HRV coherence refers to a state of optimum HRV rhythm that produces physiological entrainment of HRV, respiration, and the baroreflex. With HRV coherence, consecutive inter-beat intervals cycle from maximum to minimum and back to maximum over a period of about 10 seconds, which is associated with increased parasympathetic and decreased sympathetic tone, and a heightened state of well-being including improved affect, cognition, and executive function. Previous research suggests that HRV-B interventions may be useful for reducing symptoms of: chronic pain, anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), heart disease, and insomnia. HRV-B thus represents a promising complementary, nonpharmacological therapy that merits examination for relief of chronic pain and related symptoms among cancer survivors.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 34
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • South Carolina
    • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605
      • Greenville Health System Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer having completed radiation or chemotherapy
• 18 years of age or older
• English literate

Exclusion Criteria:

• patients receiving concurrent treatment for cancer except hormonal or biologic therapy
• patients with cardiovascular disorders that affect HRV parameters (paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction within 12 months, unstable angina)
• patients receiving medications that affect cardiac rhythm (angiotensin converting enzyme, calcium channel, or beta-adrenergic inhibitors)
• patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator
• patients who have had a heart transplant or by-pass surgery within 1 year
• patients with any active seizure disorder or use of antiseizure or anticonvulsant medication prescribed specifically for seizure disorder
• patients with a pre-existing dementia prior to cancer diagnosis
• patients with a moderate (without good recovery) or severe head injury or stroke in last 6 months
• patients with evidence of active substance abuse or dependence
• patients with a history of any major psychiatric disorder
• patients with a history of brain metastases, primary brain cancer, or altered cognitive abilities
• patients with any use of long acting (extended release) opioid medications

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Interventional Model: PARALLEL
• Masking: NONE

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Intervention Group; Biofeedback. Participants receiving the HRV-B intervention will complete a baseline assessment, a minimum of 4 weeks and up to 6 weekly training sessions (until the criterion of HRV coherence is met), and a final appointment (3-7 days later) where post-training HRV and symptom inventories will be recorded.	Behavioral: Biofeedback; Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback
NO_INTERVENTION: Control Group; To control for the laboratory environment or other potential placebo effects, a control group will receive their usual follow-up care for their cancer diagnosis and will complete baseline and post-baseline outcome assessments without any HRV-B training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Reduced Pain	Participants will attend an HRV-B training session once a week for up to 6 weeks. They will complete a questionnaire which includes a symptom cluster assessment related to pain using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI).	Weekly for 4 to 6 weeks
Reduced Stress	Participants will attend an HRV-B training session once a week for up to 6 weeks. They will complete a SUSCRO Distress Inventory which includes a symptom cluster inventory related to distress. The inventory includes 12 questions which are self-rated from 0 (not at all) to 4 (most of the time). Lower scores indicate less distress and higher scores indicate severe distress.	Weekly for 4 to 6 weeks
Reduced Fatigue	Participants will attend an HRV-B training session once a week for up to 6 weeks. They will complete a questionnaire which includes a symptom cluster inventory related to fatigue using the Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI).	Weekly for 4 to 6 weeks
Reduced Depression	Participants will attend an HRV-B training session once a week for up to 6 weeks. They will complete a questionnaire which includes a symptom cluster inventory related to depression using the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II).	Weekly for 4 to 6 weeks
Reduced Insomnia	Participants will attend an HRV-B training session once a week for up to 6 weeks. They will complete the Insomnia Symptom Questionnaire (ISQ) which includes a symptom cluster inventory related to sleep patterns. The inventory includes 13 self-rated questions. Questions 1, 2 or 5 are used to determine the presence, frequency and duration of sleep symptom criteria. Questions 6 through 13 are used to identify significant daytime consequences of sleep disturbance.	Weekly for 4 to 6 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Prisma Health-Upstate
• Collaborators: University of South Carolina

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Kim DH, Kim JA, Choi YS, Kim SH, Lee JY, Kim YE. Heart rate variability and length of survival in hospice cancer patients. J Korean Med Sci. 2010 Aug;25(8):1140-5. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.8.1140. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
• Hoffmann J, Grimm W, Menz V, Wied M, Sprenger A, Arnold R, Maisch B. Prognostic value of heart rate variability analysis in patients with carcinoid syndrome. Digestion. 2001;63(1):35-42. doi: 10.1159/000051870.
• de Miguel Sanchez C, Elustondo SG, Estirado A, Sanchez FV, de la Rasilla Cooper CG, Romero AL, Otero A, Olmos LG. Palliative performance status, heart rate and respiratory rate as predictive factors of survival time in terminally ill cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Jun;31(6):485-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2005.10.007.
• Mouton C, Ronson A, Razavi D, Delhaye F, Kupper N, Paesmans M, Moreau M, Nogaret JM, Hendlisz A, Gidron Y. The relationship between heart rate variability and time-course of carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer. Auton Neurosci. 2012 Jan 26;166(1-2):96-9. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2011.10.002. Epub 2011 Nov 9.
• Appelhans BM, Luecken LJ. Heart rate variability and pain: associations of two interrelated homeostatic processes. Biol Psychol. 2008 Feb;77(2):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.10.004. Epub 2007 Oct 12.
• Kapitza KP, Passie T, Bernateck M, Karst M. First non-contingent respiratory biofeedback placebo versus contingent biofeedback in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2010 Sep;35(3):207-17. doi: 10.1007/s10484-010-9130-1.
• Berry ME, Chapple IT, Ginsberg JP, Gleichauf KJ, Meyer JA, Nagpal ML. Non-pharmacological Intervention for Chronic Pain in Veterans: A Pilot Study of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback. Glob Adv Health Med. 2014 Mar;3(2):28-33. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.075.
• Burch JB, Ginsberg JP, McLain AC, Franco R, Stokes S, Susko K, Hendry W, Crowley E, Christ A, Hanna J, Anderson A, Hebert JR, O'Rourke MA. Symptom Management Among Cancer Survivors: Randomized Pilot Intervention Trial of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020 Jun;45(2):99-108. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09462-3.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (ACTUAL): May 10, 2015
• Primary Completion (ACTUAL): April 19, 2017
• Study Completion (ACTUAL): February 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 27, 2018
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 29, 2018
• First Posted (ACTUAL): October 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (ACTUAL): March 6, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 5, 2020
• Last Verified: March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: biofeedback; heart rate variability; cancer survivors
• Other Study ID Numbers: Pro00042898

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO
• IPD Plan Description: Information published will only be done in aggregate. All participant information will be de-identified.

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No