Reliability and Validity of Kinect Detector for Fitness Tests and Gait Performance Analysis

July 31, 2019 updated by: Yea-Ru Yang, National Yang Ming University

To Verify the Reliability and Validity of Kinect Detector While Apply to Physical Fitness Tests and Gait Performance Analysis

Background: Depending on nature and needs, physical fitness can be divided into healthy fitness and physical fitness (also known as competitive fitness). Healthy fitness includes cardio-respiratory fitness, muscle fitness, muscular endurance, flexibility, and body composition. Physical fitness includes coordination, speed, explosiveness, balance, agility, and reaction time. Although the monitoring of fitness is very important, most of the tests need to be assisted by professionally trained fitness inspectors, so that the public who wants to regularly check their fitness status will facing a dilemma-- insufficient of inspectors. In the face of such a situation, the somatosensory detector may be a choice which is relatively objective, convenient and no need to rely on the inspectors. Therefore, the validity and retest reliability of the somatosensory detector need to be verified in order to achieve accurate and objective measurement results.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Depending on nature and needs, physical fitness can be divided into healthy fitness and physical fitness (also known as competitive fitness). Healthy fitness includes cardio-respiratory fitness, muscle fitness, muscular endurance, flexibility, and body composition. Physical fitness includes coordination, speed, explosiveness, balance, agility, and reaction time. Although the monitoring of fitness is very important, most of the tests need to be assisted by professionally trained fitness inspectors, so that the public who wants to regularly check their fitness status will facing a dilemma-- insufficient of inspectors. In the face of such a situation, the somatosensory detector may be a choice which is relatively objective, convenient and no need to rely on the inspectors. Therefore, the validity and retest reliability of the somatosensory detector need to be verified in order to achieve accurate and objective measurement results.

Research purposes: To verify the retest reliability and validity of the somatosensory detector on physical fitness and gait performance.

Methods: The trial will enroll 60 subjects, 30 of them were healthy individuals between the ages of 20 and 65, and 30 are healthy elderly than 65 years of age. The exclusion criteria including: (1) those who are unable to follow the instructions and who have orthopedic, nervous system or cardiopulmonary system disorders, or who have abnormal gait pattern, or who are affected by the above physiological system disorders. Subjects will receive two tests, there's a one-week interval between each test. In the first test, the fitness assessment of the fitness inspector and the somatosensory detector was performed simultaneously, and the fitness evaluation of the somatosensory detector was performed only for the second time. And use statistical software to analyze the reliability and validity of the somatosensory detector.

Statistical Analysis: Using SPSS 20.0 for data archiving and statistical analysis, the reliability and validity of the test will be detected by intraclass correlation one-way random model, and presenting by the intraclass correlation coefficient and 95% confidence interval.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Recruiting
        • National Yang-Ming University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yea-Ru Yang, PhD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

healthy adults

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy adults

Exclusion Criteria:

  • those unable to follow to instructions
  • those have abnormal gait pattern which caused by orthopedics system disorders, nervous system disorders or cardio-respiratory disorders
  • those with abnormal movement performance which caused by physiological system obstacles

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Healthy adults
Subjects will receive pre and post-test, in order to verify the test-retest reliability of the Somatosensory detector
no intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait speed
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one week
Gait speed is calculated using distance in meters and time in seconds.
Change from baseline at one week
Gait cadence
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one week
Cadence is the rate at which a person walk, expressed in steps per minute.
Change from baseline at one week
Gait stride length
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one week
The stride length is the distance between two successive placements of the same foot.
Change from baseline at one week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
One leg standing test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one week
To test balance ability
Change from baseline at one week
Functional forward reach test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one week
To test functional balance performance
Change from baseline at one week
Timed up and go test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one week
To test functional balance performance
Change from baseline at one week
Upper arm curl test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one week
To test functional muscle strength of upper extremities
Change from baseline at one week
30 seconds sit-stand-sit test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one week
To test functional muscle strength of lower extremities
Change from baseline at one week
2 minutes stepping test
Time Frame: Change from baseline at one week
To test cardiopulmonary ability
Change from baseline at one week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 31, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • YM106054E

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Adults

Clinical Trials on no intervention

3
Subscribe