Comparison of AIRVO High Flow Oxygen Therapy With Standard Care for Prevention of PPCs After Major H&N Surgery
Comparison of AIRVO High Flow Oxygen Therapy With Standard Care for Prevention of Post-operative Pulmonary Complications After Major Head and Neck Surgery Involving Insertion of a Tracheostomy - A Proof of Concept Study
Patients undergoing major head and neck surgery often develop breathing difficulties as a result of build up of sputum and difficulty taking deep breaths. Often as part of the surgery patients may also require a tracheotomy tube (a temporary tube placed into their airway) which is removed around 5-7 days after the operation. The presence of this tracheostomy tube increases the patient's risk of developing breathing problems, especially difficulty clearing sputum and reduced lung volumes. To reduce the risk of developing these problems, different forms of oxygen therapy and humidification are used. This normally involves using oxygen masks, nebulisers and other medications to help loosen the sputum and maintain blood oxygen levels. Another method of giving oxygen and humidification is through the use of AIRVO, which delivers the air / oxygen to the patient at higher rates as well as warming and humidifying the air.
The aim of this study is to compare the AIRVO system to standard care in a small sample of patients (20 patients) undergoing major head and neck surgery involving insertion of a tracheostomy tube.
The study will compare rates of breathing complications (e.g. pneumonia, reduced lung volume) as well as comparing the time to remove the tracheostomy tube and the time the patient is required to stay in hospital. These results will then be used to develop a larger funded study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Major head and neck surgery involving micro-vascular reconstructions are prolonged procedures with considerable post operative risk. Not only do patients have prolonged time in theatre, the surgery involves two distinct surgical sites (head & neck site and peripheral flap donor site), and requires the patient to be admitted to a high care area for overnight sedation and ventilation. This combined with the presence of significant co-morbidities such as hypertension, cardiomyopathy and respiratory disease, place the patient at significant risk of post-operative complications. A recent prospective cohort study reported complication rates in nearly 65% of cases, of which 29% were of pulmonary origin. Furthermore, of these, 14 patients required treatment in the intensive care or high dependency. Interestingly, and in contrast to other research3, neither pre-operative smoking nor the presence of pre-existing lung disease predicted pulmonary complications.
The risks of post-operative pulmonary complications (PPCs) seem to be further increased in those patients requiring a tracheostomy. This tracheostomy is required to facilitate access to the tumour location and to provide post-operative airway protection in the presence of significant swelling or oedema. The risks of tracheostomy are well known4. Patients are prone to increased rates of infection, poor sputum clearance and inadequate humidification. These complications lead to prolonged admissions, delays in tracheostomy weaning and considerable healthcare related costs. To overcome these issues national guidance documents have identified the need to provide adequate humidification to prevent mucus plugging, as well as the provision of increased nursing care for stoma site cleaning and inner tube care. Historically, humidification has been provided by heated systems however due to perceived increased infection risk this has fallen out of favour and now passive humidification systems such as heat moisture exchangers have become more popular.
Clearly, the combination of the risks of major head and neck surgery and those of a tracheostomy, place the patient at significant risk. As such it is essential to develop new post-operative management protocols to reduce the occurrence of post-operative complications.
AIRVOTM (a form of non-invasive high flow oxygen therapy, HFOT), which delivers high flow heated and humidified oxygen and air via a tracheostomy tube at a prescribed fraction of inspired oxygen and a maximum flow of 60 L/min, is an attractive alternative to conventional oxygen therapy. Previous studies have shown that HFOT therapy generates a flow-dependent positive airway pressure and improves oxygenation by increasing end-expiratory lung volume, thus suggesting a possible alveolar recruitment associated with high-flow therapy. Although widely used in other clinical areas including patients with tracheostomy tubes, HFOT delivered in the AIRVOTM system has yet to be evaluated in the Head and Neck surgery population.
This study aims to compare the effects of application of HFOT(delivered via AIRVOTM) therapy and conventional oxygen and humidification administration after major head and neck surgery involving insertion of a tracheostomy tube on postoperative pulmonary complications. The study will also compare post-operative length of stay, time to tracheostomy tube cuff deflation, tracheostomy tube decannulation, antibiotic use and post-operative physiotherapy requirements.
The results of this proof of concept study will be used to further develop local protocols and to inform a grant funded multi-centre trial.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cardiff, United Kingdom, CF144XW
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Undergoing head and neck surgery with microvascular reconstruction and involving insertion of a tracheostomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under 18 years old
- Lack of consent
- Consultant request
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: High flow oxygen therapy
Patients allocated to the intervention group will receive high flow oxygen therapy via the tracheostomy tube from cessation of mechanical ventilation. The HFOT will provide oxygen therapy at a flow rate of 50-60 litres per minute at a FiO2 titrated by the bedside clinician to maintain a peripheral oxygen saturation of 95% of more (unless otherwise clinically indicated and documented by an appropriate consultant). Once transferred to the ward patients will continue to receive HFOT 24 hours per day at a rate of 50-60 litres per minute at a maximum oxygen concentration of 40% to achieve oxygen saturations 95% and above (unless otherwise documented). Patients may be disconnected from the HFOT for short periods for toileting, mobilising etc. Tracheostomy weaning will continue as per standard practice with an aim of cuff deflation followed by decannulation once clinically appropriate. systems. Following decannulation patients will resort to standard oxygen therapy as needed. |
High flow oxygen therapy delivered via Airvo2
|
|
No Intervention: Standard Care
Patients randomised to the standard care study arm will receive routine post-operative care as currently performed within the host organisation.
Following cessation of mechanical ventilation, oxygen therapy will be delivered using equipment and rates appropriate to the clinical picture.
On transfer to the ward patients will continue with existing methods of oxygen therapy and will be weaned from these accordingly.
Patients will continue to use heat moisture exchanges (e.g.
Swedish nose or Buchannan protectors) as clinically indicated, as well as having saline nebulisers prescribed and administered as per standard.
Tracheostomy weaning will continue in accordance with current practice.
Data on all of the applied procedures will be recorded.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Percentage of participants diagnosed with post-operative Pulmonary Complications
Time Frame: Up to 48hours post tracheostomy decannulation
|
Up to 48hours post tracheostomy decannulation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to decannulation
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
|
Measured in days
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
|
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
|
Measured in days
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
|
Amount of physiotherapy intervention recieved by each participant
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
|
Measured in minutes
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
|
Feasability of recruitment, randomisation, delivery of intervention, and completion of outcome measures
Time Frame: Up to 4 weeks
|
Measured in percentages
|
Up to 4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 223048
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.