IV Steroids Versus Steroids Included in Block for Orthopedic Lower Limb Surgery

June 30, 2021 updated by: Peter R. Lichtenthal, MD, University of Arizona

Double Blind Prospective Study of IV Steroids Versus Steroids Included in Block for Orthopedic Lower Limb Surgery

IV and included steroids have produced the same length of block prolongation in adults as if the steroid was given with the nerve block. Clinically, this has not be noticed in children. The objective of this study is to examine this in young patients. The investigator will blindly give the steroid either in the IV or in the block solution (perineural). This is a prospective double blind study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The subject has a 50/50 chance of receiving either cohort. After the subject is randomized to receive either steroid given IV or with the nerve block, the subject is anesthetized and the subject will receive either an IV injection of 5 cc steroids or placebo, and 20 cc local anesthetic plus placebo or steroid in the nerve block, the block will be placed under ultrasound to insure proper placement of block, the dose of steroid is based on weight, 0.1 - 0.15 mg/kg. The investigator will record the time of block and IV injection. The subjects will be called by the study PI after 24 hours to determine the time of duration and again at 48 hours if needed. This is a randomized, double blind study, neither the subject or the anesthesiologist giving the injection will know what is being given. The medications will be prepared and dispensed by the Research pharmacist, a randomization chart will be obtained by the research pharmacist.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85719
        • Banner University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 25 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled to have a lower limb Orthopedic surgical procedure.
  • Scheduled to have a nerve block placed for post operative analgesia.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Class I - III.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not scheduled to have a nerve block placed for post operative analgesia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebos
Depending on the randomization, this group will receive a saline solution either in the IV catheter or the saline solution will be given perineural with the Mepivicaine nerve block solution.
This will be a saline solution of given IV or perineural.
Other Names:
  • Non-active
Active Comparator: Dexamethasone Sodium Phosphate
Depending on the randomization, this group will receive dexamethasone 0.1 - 0.15 mg/kg, either in the IV catheter or the dexamethasone, 0.1 - 0.15 mg/kg will be given perineural with the Mepivicaine nerve block solution.
This will be the active drug solution given IV or perineural.
Other Names:
  • Active treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Analgesia Duration
Time Frame: 24 - 48 hours
The investigator would like to investigate if the dexamethasone given IV or with the nerve block in young patients undergoing lower limb surgery produces the same duration of analgesia.
24 - 48 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter R Lichtenthal, MD, University of Arizona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 5, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 28, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 26, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lower Limb Injury

Clinical Trials on Placebos

Subscribe