- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06419920
Prosthetic Performance Enhancement Trial (PROSPER)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Despite advances in the technology for artificial limbs (prostheses), falling and the fear of falling continue to be barriers to mobility for many lower limb prosthesis users after their initial rehabilitation. The loss of ability and confidence in pursuing everyday tasks negatively impacts quality of life, and ongoing physical and mental health. This study will test and improve a rehabilitation training intervention involving walking on uneven ground to improve walking skill and confidence in lower limb prosthesis users.
Lower limb prosthesis users will be recruited. Participants will be allocated randomly to receive either intervention A: training on a flat surface, or intervention B: training on an uneven surface. Depending on their ability and confidence, participants will complete the walking practice either on a treadmill or on a mat with an identical surface pattern. The walking practice will take place three times per week for four weeks. As each participant improves their ability, training tasks will be made more difficult by limiting handrail use, by increasing walking speed, and, for intervention B, also by making the walking surface more uneven.
The objectives of this pilot study are to evaluate adherence and refine the training protocols in preparation for a definitive trial that will inform rehabilitation practices.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jenny A Kent, PhD, CSci
- Phone Number: 7028955949
- Email: jenny.kent@unlv.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Nevada
-
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89154
- Recruiting
- University of Nevada Las Vegas
-
Contact:
- Jenny A Kent, PhD, CSci
- Phone Number: 7028955949
- Email: jenny.kent@unlv.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- lower limb amputation at ankle (Symes) level and above
- age 18+ years
- fitted with a walking prosthesis and use it regularly for home and/or community ambulation
- good socket fit, assessed by a score of 8-10 on the socket fit comfort scale
- able to walk for three minutes at a time with or without an assistive device
Exclusion Criteria:
- leg/foot ulcer or other conditions that cause pain during weight-bearing
- poor skin integrity that could cause tissue breakdown by walking
- cardiovascular, respiratory or other critical health conditions that preclude moderate physical activity
- unilateral or bilateral upper limb absence or loss at the wrist and above that precludes use of handrails bilaterally, or would require asymmetrical adaptation to body posture for use.
- pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Flat terrain training
Walking on a standard, flat treadmill or mat.
|
The training will be comprised of up to 12 sets of 2-min continuous walking on a level treadmill or mat, interspersed with rest breaks of at least one minute.
Training will be completed three times per week for four weeks.
|
|
Experimental: Uneven terrain training
Walking on an uneven terrain treadmill or mat.
|
The training will be comprised of up to 12 sets of 2-min continuous walking on an uneven terrain treadmill or mat, interspersed with rest breaks of at least one minute.
Training will be completed three times per week for four weeks.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Session adherence
Time Frame: Through study completion, over 4 weeks
|
Percentage of planned sessions attended, per participant.
|
Through study completion, over 4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
L-test time
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
Time to complete L-test, in s.
Participant rises from a chair and guided by cones, walks 10m forward, turns 90 degrees, walks a further 10m, turns 180 degrees, then follows the same path back to the chair and sits.
Result from a single test following one practice trial is recorded.
|
Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
|
Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale summary score
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
16-item self report measure recording confidence in performing activities during daily life that require balance, on numerical ratings scale, recorded as a percentage (out of 100).
|
Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
|
Average daily activity
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
Mean number of steps per day over 7 days, collected using ankle worn activity monitor.
|
Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
|
Four Square Step Test time
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
Time to complete forwards, lateral and backwards stepping pattern, in s.
|
Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
|
Two-minute walk test distance
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
Walking distance traveled in two minutes, in m.
|
Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
|
Protocol acceptability
Time Frame: End of intervention week 4
|
Likert scale questions and short answer questions to determine acceptability of protocol to participants, assessed qualitatively.
|
End of intervention week 4
|
|
Recruitment feasibility - recruitment rate
Time Frame: From start of recruitment period, to 12 month time point.
|
Number of participants recruited within one year
|
From start of recruitment period, to 12 month time point.
|
|
Recruitment feasibility - participating clinics
Time Frame: Through study completion, from start of recruitment period, to end of recruitment period or 30 month time point, whichever is sooner.
|
Number of clinics from which at least one participant is recruited.
|
Through study completion, from start of recruitment period, to end of recruitment period or 30 month time point, whichever is sooner.
|
|
Recruitment feasibility - sample characteristics
Time Frame: Through study completion, from start of recruitment period, to end of recruitment period or 30 month time point, whichever is sooner.
|
Sample characteristics of all participants enrolled in the study, regardless of completion.
|
Through study completion, from start of recruitment period, to end of recruitment period or 30 month time point, whichever is sooner.
|
|
Activity data evaluation
Time Frame: Throughout activity monitoring period, over 2 weeks
|
Completeness and quality of activity monitor data, measured as number of days with valid (non-erroneous) monitoring data.
|
Throughout activity monitoring period, over 2 weeks
|
|
Maximum relative variability of lateral trunk velocity during uneven terrain in comparison to overground walking
Time Frame: Through study completion, over 4 weeks
|
Medial-lateral trunk variability will be quantified during each bout of walking during each session.
The maximum relative variability will be calculated as the difference in variability (standard deviation) of peak per-step lateral trunk velocity during UT walking sessions relative to that of overground walking, in m/s.
|
Through study completion, over 4 weeks
|
|
Contour depth at maximum relative variability
Time Frame: Through study completion, over 4 weeks
|
Terrain contour depth at which the maximum relative variability was recorded, in m.
|
Through study completion, over 4 weeks
|
|
Maximum relative step width variability during uneven terrain in comparison to overground walking
Time Frame: Through study completion, over 4 weeks
|
Step width variability will be quantified during each bout of walking during each session.
The maximum relative variability will be calculated as the difference in variability (standard deviation) of step width during UT walking sessions relative to that of overground walking, in m.
|
Through study completion, over 4 weeks
|
|
Single leg stand time
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
Time standing on one leg up to a maximum of 20s, in s.
|
Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
|
Prosthesis Users Survey of Mobility t-score
Time Frame: Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
12-item self report tool measuring prosthesis users' mobility.
|
Pre-intervention, within 5 days post intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jenny A Kent, PhD, CSci, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UNLV-2023-595
- CDMRP-OP230011 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Department of Defence)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.