- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03950440
Assessing the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium Following Aortic Valve Replacement (IPOD-AV)
May 17, 2022 updated by: dr. Danny Hoogma, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Assessing the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium Following Aortic Valve Surgery
Our primary aim in this observational study is to identify the incidence of POD in the first five postoperative days by using the 3-minute Diagnostic confusion assessment method (3D-CAM), the derived version for intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) or nurse reports in patients undergoing different techniques of aortic valve replacement.
Patients are followed 5 days postoperative with the 3D-CAM or until resolution of POD.
Six months postoperatively, a follow-up by phone is planned for activity of daily living (ADL).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
A significant and often underrecognized complication after surgery is postoperative delirium (POD) causing increased morbidity and mortality.
This is especially true for the older cardiac surgical patient, in whom the incidence of POD is up to 70%.
Surgical invasiveness and herewith related inflammation, a cholinergic load of medications, postoperative pain or use of opioids are examples of precipitating factors that can be altered to reduce the incidence of POD.
Transaortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a revolutionary technique that has led to a dramatic decrease in surgical invasiveness and improved outcomes in high-risk surgical patients.
However, only a few studies evaluated neurocognitive outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) compared to TAVR, suggesting a reduced incidence of POD with TAVR compared to SAVR.
In contrast, other studies found almost no difference in POD in the aforementioned patient groups.
Hence, it remains still unclear which technique best to use in patients at high risk for POD.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
250
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Leuven, Belgium, 3000
- University Hospitals Leuven
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
70 years and older (Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
Any patient presenting for the indicated surgery in a tertiary university hospital
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients scheduled to undergo elective
- TAVI
- SAVR (with or without coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or pulmonary vein isolation (PVI))
- Patient able to read and understand the research materials
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to give informed consent
- Presence of delirium at baseline as screened with the 3-minute Diagnostic Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM)
- Combined surgical procedures (e.g. mitral valve surgery, aortic surgery or other)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Postoperative Delirium
Time Frame: Until the fifth postoperative day in hospital (an average of 5 days). In case of POD, followup was continued until resolution of POD or discharge (whichever comes first) up to 19 days.
|
Using the 3-minute Diagnostic confusion assessment method (3D-CAM), the derived version for intensive care unit (CAM-ICU) and nurse reports combined with interview with the caregivers and patient
|
Until the fifth postoperative day in hospital (an average of 5 days). In case of POD, followup was continued until resolution of POD or discharge (whichever comes first) up to 19 days.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Duration of POD
Time Frame: If POD develops during the first 5 postoperative days, patient will be followed until POD has resolved or until discharge
|
Duration of delirium in days using the 3D-CAM or ICU-CAM
|
If POD develops during the first 5 postoperative days, patient will be followed until POD has resolved or until discharge
|
|
Onset Moment of Postoperative Delirium
Time Frame: During the first five postoperative days
|
Moment of onset of POD during the first five postoperative days or until discharge
|
During the first five postoperative days
|
|
Severity of POD
Time Frame: If POD develops during the first 5 postoperative days, patient will be followed until POD has resolved or until discharge
|
assessed with the delirium long severity measure-based confusion assessment method (CAM-S Long).
Ten features are evaluated and scored.
The first item is either 0 (not present) or 1 (yes).
The other 9 features are scored as 0 (not present), 1 (present but mild) or 2 (present and marked).
These subscores are than combined on a scale ranging from 0 (no delirium) to 19 (severe delirium).
|
If POD develops during the first 5 postoperative days, patient will be followed until POD has resolved or until discharge
|
|
Number of Patients With Adverse Events According to the Composite Endpoint Early Safety According to VARC-2 at 30 Days
Time Frame: Until 30 days postoperatively
|
Count of patient having an adverse event according to the composite endpoint "Early safety (at 30 days)" defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2.
These include: all-cause mortality, all stroke, life threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3 and major vascular complications.
|
Until 30 days postoperatively
|
|
Number of Patients With Adverse Events According to the Composite Endpoint Clinical Efficacy According to VARC-2 at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Count of patient having an adverse event according to the composite endpoint "Clinical efficacy (at 6 months)" defined by the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-2.
These include: all-cause mortality, all stroke, rehospitalization, NYHA Classe 3 or 4 and valve dysfunction.
|
6 months
|
|
Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living During 6-months Interview
Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively
|
Assessment of Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) divided over 7 items.
Each item can be scored with either 0 (not capable), 1 (capable with aid) or 2 (without aid).
These subscores are summed on a scale ranging from 0 (worse outcome) to 14 (best outcome).
|
6 months postoperatively
|
|
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Length of Stay
Time Frame: Until 30 days postoperatively
|
Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay following the procedure
|
Until 30 days postoperatively
|
|
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: Until 30 days postoperatively
|
Amount of days hospitalized in the primary center
|
Until 30 days postoperatively
|
|
Count of Patients Discharged Directly Home
Time Frame: Until 30 days postoperatively
|
Discharge destination directly after discharge from the hospital back home
|
Until 30 days postoperatively
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay
|
30 days
|
|
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Amount of days hospitalized in the primary center
|
30 days
|
|
Discharge destination
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Discharge destination defined as: home, nursing home, revalidation unit or other hospital.
|
30 days
|
|
6-months interview
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Assessment of different questionnaires: self-administered instrumental activities of daily living, 5 dimensional quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), visual analoge scale for quality of life (EQ-VAS) and cognitive failure questionnaire.
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 23, 2018
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 20, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
July 9, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 10, 2019
First Posted (Actual)
May 15, 2019
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 16, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 17, 2022
Last Verified
May 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- S61710
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Stenosis
-
Azienda Ospedaliera "Sant'Andrea"University of Bologna; Politecnico di Milano; Centro Cardiologico Monzino; I.R.C...RecruitingAortic Stenosis | Calcific Aortic Valve Disease | Chronic Coronary Syndrome | Calcific Aortic StenosisItaly
-
National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, PolandThe Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of SciencesRecruitingAortic Stenosis | Low-gradient Aortic StenosisPoland
-
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai HospitalEdwards (Shanghai) Lifesciences Medical Supplies Co., Ltd.Not yet recruiting
-
Anteris Technologies Ltd.Active, not recruitingAortic Stenosis | Aortic Valve Calcification | Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis | Symptomatic Aortic StenosisUnited States
-
MiRusRecruitingAortic Stenosis | Symptomatic Severe Native Aortic StenosisUnited States
-
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteNot yet recruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Severe Aortic Valve StenosisSpain
-
RenJi HospitalRecruitingSevere Aortic Valve StenosisChina
-
Shanghai MicroPort CardioFlow Medtech Co., Ltd.CompletedSevere Aortic Stenosis | Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacemenChina
-
Idoven 1903 S.L.Recruiting
-
University of Tennessee Graduate School of MedicineShockwave Medical, Inc.Recruiting