Evaluation of the Non-invasive Electrocardiographic Monitoring Strategy Associated With Early Discharge in Patients With Conduction Disorder Through TAVI Implantation (IMPROVE)

Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a non-invasive electrocardiographic monitoring strategy associated with early discharge in patients with conduction disorder after transfemoral TAVI implantation, and its potential benefits compared to standard care.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a non-invasive electrocardiographic monitoring strategy associated with early discharge in patients with conduction disorder after transfemoral TAVI implantation, and its potential benefits compared to standard care.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Unniversitari Vall d'Hebron

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All inclusion criteria must be met

  • Age ≥ 18 years and
  • Undergone successful transfemoral or transaortic TAVI for severe aortic stenosis and
  • Presence of at least one of the following conduction disorders and
  • Pre-procedural basal conduction disorder (e.g., right/left bundle branch block, bifascicular block, IVCD) with QRS between 120-160 msec.
  • De novo conduction disorder after TAVI (de novo bundle branch block) with QRS between 120-160 msec.
  • Clinical stability at 24 hours post-procedure and
  • Capacity to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

No exclusion criteria must be met

  • Immediate indication for permanent pacemaker following the procedure.
  • Persistent complete atrioventricular block.
  • QRS >160 msec and/or PR prolongation.
  • Haemodynamic instability or complications of TAVI (major bleeding, stroke, decompensated heart failure) that contraindicate early discharge.
  • Technical or clinical impossibility of using the PhysioMem PM 1004G monitoring system.
  • Life expectancy < 12 months due to non-cardiovascular comorbidity.
  • Refusal or inability to undergo outpatient follow-up.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early discharge (24 hours post-TAVI)
Patients will be discharged from the hospital 24 hours post-TAVI with PhysioMem PM 100 4G ambulatory monitoring system.
Patients discharged with PhysioMem PM 100 4G ambulatory monitoring system
Active Comparator: Discharge according Standard Care
Patients will be discharged from the hospital according standard care
Patients discharged according to standard care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite of all-cause death and rehospitalization for any reason
Time Frame: 30 days

Proportion of patients with:

  • All cause of death
  • Rehospitalization for any reason
30 days
Clinically relevant arrhythmic event requiring a change in therapy
Time Frame: 30 days

Proportion of patients with clinically relevant arrhythmic event requiring a change in therapy, defined as the occurrence of any of the following:

  • Cardiac conduction disorders
  • Clinically relevant tachyarrhythmias
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause death
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of all-cause death
30 days
All-cause death
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of all-cause death
12 months
Unscheduled hospital readmission for any reason
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of unscheduled hospital readmission for any reason
30 days
Unscheduled hospital readmission for any reason
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of unscheduled hospital readmission for any reason
12 months
Cardiovascular death
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of cardiovascular death
30 days
Cardiovascular death
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of cardiovascular death
12 months
Hospital readmission due to cardiovascular cause
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of Hospital readmission due to cardiovascular cause
30 days
Hospital readmission due to cardiovascular cause
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of Hospital readmission due to cardiovascular cause
12 months
Implantation of a permanent pacemaker
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of Implantation of a permanent pacemaker
30 days
Implantation of a permanent pacemaker
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of Implantation of a permanent pacemaker
12 months
High-degree atrioventricular block (II or III)
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of High-degree atrioventricular block (II or III)
30 days
De novo or recurrent atrial fibrillation requiring a change in therapy
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of De novo or recurrent atrial fibrillation requiring a change in therapy
30 days
Time to pacemaker implantation or therapeutic change due to arrhythmia
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of Time to pacemaker implantation or therapeutic change due to arrhythmia
30 days
Time to pacemaker implantation or therapeutic change due to arrhythmia
Time Frame: 12 months
Incidence of Time to pacemaker implantation or therapeutic change due to arrhythmia
12 months
Resolution vs persistence of conduction disorders
Time Frame: 72 hours
Incidence of Resolution vs persistence of conduction disorders detected in the first 72 hours after TAVI implantation
72 hours
QRS evolution: transient, persistent, or normalisation
Time Frame: 30 days
Incidence of QRS evolution: transient, persistent, or normalisation
30 days
Remote monitoring
Time Frame: 30 days
Percentage of time monitored correctly
30 days
hospital length to of stay from TAVI to discharge
Time Frame: At discharge
Duration of hospitalization post-TAVI procedure
At discharge
Direct cost associated with stay and readmissions
Time Frame: 12 Months
Evaluation of Direct cost associated with hospital stay and readmissions
12 Months
Quality of life assessed using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Time Frame: 30 days
Quality of life assessed using (KCCQ)assessed using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). The KCCQ is a 23-item questionnaire developed to assess HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life) in patients with congestive heart failure. The KCCQ consists of five domains: physical limitation, symptoms (frequency, severity, and recent change over time), QoL (Quality of Life), social interference, and self-efficacy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, and higher scores reflect better health status.
30 days
Quality of life assessed using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Time Frame: 12 Months
Quality of life assessed using (KCCQ)assessed using Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). The KCCQ is a 23-item questionnaire developed to assess HRQoL (Health-Related Quality of Life) in patients with congestive heart failure. The KCCQ consists of five domains: physical limitation, symptoms (frequency, severity, and recent change over time), QoL (Quality of Life), social interference, and self-efficacy. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, and higher scores reflect better health status.
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Szotek M, Drużbicki Ł, Sabatowski K, Amoroso GR, De Schouwer K, Matusik PT. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Cardiac Conduction Abnormalities: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Management. J Clin Med. 19 September 2023;12(18):6056.
  • Mangieri A, Montalto C, Pagnesi M, Lanzillo G, Demir O, Testa L, et al. TAVI and Post Procedural Cardiac Conduction Abnormalities. Front Cardiovasc Med. 3 July 2018;5:85.
  • Tsoi M, Tandon K, Zimetbaum PJ, Frishman WH. Conduction Disturbances and Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Predictors and Prevention. Cardiol Rev. July 2022;30(4):179-87
  • Van Gils L, Baart S, Kroon H, Rahhab Z, El Faquir N, Rodriguez Olivares R, et al. Conduction dynamics after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and implications for permanent pacemaker implantation and early discharge: the CONDUCT study. EP Eur. 1 December 2018;20(12):1981-8.
  • Piazza N, Nuis RJ, Tzikas A, Otten A, Onuma Y, García-García H, et al. Persistent conduction abnormalities and requirements for pacemaking six months after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. September 2010;6(4):475-84.
  • Kooistra NHM, Van Mourik MS, Rodriguez-Olivares R, Maass AH, Nijenhuis VJ, Van De Werf H, et al. P3856Timing and associated predictors of onset of new conduction disturbances requiring permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Eur Heart J. 1 October 2019;40(Supplement_1):ehz745.0694.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on PhysioMem PM 100 4G ambulatory monitoring system

Subscribe