A Default Option to Enhance Dietary Quality in Participants With Food Insecurity

May 14, 2019 updated by: University at Albany
Food insecurity is associated with an increased risk of overweight/obesity and weight-related chronic illnesses. The availability of a default option (i.e., option a consumer selects if no active choice is made) has been shown to effectively nudge consumer behavior. An online default option (i.e., prefilled grocery shopping cart) was previously shown to positively impact food selection in an online grocery shopping task.The present study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of an online default option in enhancing the nutritional quality of online grocery purchases in individuals with food insecurity.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Food insecurity is associated with an increased risk of overweight/obesity and weight-related chronic illnesses. The present study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of an online default option in enhancing the nutritional quality of online grocery purchases in individuals with food insecurity.

In behavioral economics, the default option refers to the option a consumer selects if no active choice is made. This study aims to determine whether the use of a default prefilled online grocery shopping cart results in the purchase of healthier food items in individuals with food insecurity, compared to nutrition education. The default approach, a non-monetary intervention that manipulates choice architecture, improves food choice behaviors in individuals facing significant financial constraints. The intervention is potentially broadly scalable via online platforms.

It was hypothesized that the default option effectively increases the nutritional quality of foods purchased online, compared to nutrition education.

Fifty participants recruited from food pantries in New York in 2018 were randomized to: (1) review nutrition information before selecting groceries for a week using a local grocery store's online shopping and delivery service (n = 23) or (2) modify a default prefilled online shopping cart containing groceries that meet nutritional guidelines according to their personal preferences (n = 27).

Primary outcome measures capture the nutritional quality of groceries purchased. Our primary nutritional outcomes include servings of whole grains fruits and vegetables, fiber, daily calories, fat, saturated fat, sodium and cholesterol content.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. age 18 or older
  2. single person household
  3. fluent in written and spoken English
  4. able to provide informed consent
  5. food-insecure (verbal agreement that they consider themselves to be of that category) but not currently receiving SNAP benefits (as they would otherwise have access to twice the amount of benefits typically allocated; please note that all participants will be provided with information about enrollment in SNAP following study participation)
  6. current residence in a zip code served by Price Chopper's delivery program

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. None of the following dietary restrictions: vegetarian/vegan, gluten-free/celiacs disease, and lactose intolerant
  2. current residence outside of a zip code served by Price Chopper's delivery program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Default
Participants in the default condition were presented with a pre-filled online shopping cart containing a combination of groceries that meet macro- and micronutrient requirements for their gender and age, and told that they are free to delete, add, and exchange any item they wish to finalize their selections.
The "default option" is a behavioral economics construct that refers to the option a consumer selects if no active choice is made (e.g. opt-out 401K plans, which significantly increase enrollment, compared to active sign up). Participants in the default condition were presented with a prefilled online shopping cart containing groceries that met nutritional requirements based on participants' gender and age.
Active Comparator: Nutrition Education
Participants in the nutrition education condition were instructed to read a brief education brochure before online grocery shopping.
The nutrition education materials were adapted from materials currently utilized by the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance ("Eat Smart New York").

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Nutritional Quality of Groceries Purchased
Time Frame: Single visit, <1.5 hours
The Thrifty Food Plan Calculator (TFPC) was used to quantify the nutritional quality of groceries selected by study participants. The TFPC was developed using U.S. Department of Agriculture nutrition and consumption data and is designed to have users input information about the relative amount of money spent on various categories of food and provides comprehensive information on caloric, macro-, and micronutrient content of the foods selected based on participant age and gender.
Single visit, <1.5 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julia M. Hormes, PhD, University at Albany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-E-260-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nutrition Poor

Clinical Trials on Default Option While Online Grocery Shopping

3
Subscribe