Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Chronic Pain Related to Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

May 21, 2019 updated by: Enes Efe Is, Istanbul University

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a promising non-invasive brain stimulation technique in chronic pain. There is no study investigating the effectiveness of tDCS in radiating chronic lower extremity pain related to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of tDCS on pain, walking capacity, functional status and quality of life in patients with chronic pain related to LSS.

32 patients diagnosed with chronic pain related to LSS will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patients in active group will receive 10 sessions of anodal tDCS delivered over primary motor cortex (M1) with a constant current of 2 miliAmpers for 20 minutes. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, on day 1, 5 and 10 (after the session) and 5 days, 1 month and 3 months after treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Recruiting
        • Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

45 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Magnetic resonance imaging evidence of narrowing of the central canal, lateral recess, and/or foramen.
  • Persistent leg pain for at least 3 months
  • An average pain intensity score (during walking) of at least 4 out of 10 on the Visual Analog Scale at screening and randomisation
  • Persistent neurogenic claudication for at least 3 months
  • stable pharmacological treatment for pain and sleep disorders for at least 1 month before the study and throughout the trial
  • If present, coexisting low back pain intensity should be less than leg pain intensity.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with other neurological or psychiatric disorders including ongoing major depression (Beck Depression Score>14)
  • Uncontrolled/unstable endocrinologic, cardiovascular, pulmonary, hematologic, hepatic, renal disease
  • Inflammatory diseases, cancer
  • Severe hip and/or knee osteoarthritis that affects Treadmill Walking Test
  • Absolute/relative contraindications of tDCS (past head trauma resulting with loss of consciousness, epilepsy, past neurosurgical intervention, intracranial hypertension, implanted devices, migraine, chronic-severe headache episodes, a history of side effects with non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, skin diseases, pregnancy)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active
Active stimulation over M1
Patients in active group will receive 10 sessions of anodal tDCS delivered over primary motor cortex (M1) contralateral to the most painful side with a constant current of 2 miliAmpers for 20 minutes.
Placebo Comparator: Sham
Sham stimulation over M1
Same protocol (electrode montage,session duration) will be used for sham stimulation. But the device won't be active for full 20 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Pain as measured by Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The visual analog scale for pain is a straight line, 10 centimeters (10 cm) in length with one end meaning no pain and the other end meaning the worst pain imaginable. A patient marks a point on the line that matches the amount of pain he or she feels. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity (0 (min)-10 (max)) .
12 weeks
Walking Duration and Distance
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Patients will be asked to walk on a treadmill at zero angle and a self-selected speed until they have to stop due to symptoms of LSS or until a time limit of 30 minutes has been reached. To start the test, the investigator slowly increases the speed to 1.9 km per hour. The subjects will be then allowed to modify the speed during the test to maintain a pace that is comfortable for them. Subjects will be asked to notify the investigator when they first experience a change in symptoms. Subjects will be also asked to avoid holding the handle bars. Total distance and time, distance and time to onset of symptoms will be measured.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Functional Status
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The investigators will use the Modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire to assess changes in functional status. The Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI) is a validated, 10-point patient-reported outcome questionnaire. Each of the 10 questions is scored from 0 to 5, giving a maximum score of 50. The total score is then converted into a percentage by multiplying it by 2. A higher score indicates worse functional status.
12 weeks
Changes in Quality of Life: Short Form-36
Time Frame: 12 weeks
The investigators will use the Short Form-36 to assess changes in quality of life. The SF-36 is a 36-item self-report measure of health-related quality of life. It has eight subscales measuring different domains of health-related quality of life: physical functioning (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social functioning (SF), role-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). The SF-36 also includes a single item that assesses perceived change in health status over the past year. Higher scores on all subscales represent better health and functioning.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Enes Efe Is, MD, Istanbul University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 31, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 21, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on active tDCS

Subscribe