Priming Attachment Security Within an IAPT Setting

July 13, 2019 updated by: Charlotte Heathcote, University of Sheffield

Priming Attachment Security Within an IAPT Setting: A Feasibility and Pilot Study

There is growing evidence that priming attachment security is associated with improved attitudes towards therapy, increased engagement and decreased levels of depression and anxiety. Within the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) programme a consistent problem has been identified of high dropout rates at step 2 services (i.e. where mild to moderate anxious and depressed patients receive guided self-help interventions). The current study incorporates a feasibility and pilot design. The feasibility element will explore issues related to study design to determine suitability for conducting a future randomised control trial (RCT). The pilot study will look at the processes outlined in the protocol to determine whether the study components all work together. Moreover, it will preliminarily aim to explore the effectiveness of the attachment security priming intervention on symptoms of depression and anxiety, as well as impaired functioning. Both elements of the study will determine whether any changes are needed to the study design or protocol, and whether a future RCT is suitable and necessary.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study is being conducted in an IAPT primary care service in North Yorkshire. The study will be recruiting 50 participants experiencing mild to moderate depression who are deemed suitable for 'behavioural activation' low intensity guided self-help intervention. Following telephone screening for intervention, clinicians will ask clients if they wish to hear more about participating in a research study. If participants say yes, their contact details will be passed on to the researcher who will send them the study information sheet and consent form in the post. If the participant consents to taking part in the research, they will be randomised to receive either treatment as usual (low-intensity guided self-help utilising behavioural activation for depression) or treatment with security priming intervention (treatment as usual with an additional security priming task). They will have between 6-8 sessions as routinely delivered within the service and will be asked to complete measures of depression, anxiety and impaired functioning on a sessional basis. The principal investigator at the study site will collect information regarding attendance to therapy, dropout rates, and 'stepping' clients up to higher-intensity therapies as primary outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Yorkshire
      • Harrogate, North Yorkshire, United Kingdom, hg12pw
        • Harrogate IAPT Service

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Accepted for Behavioural Activation guided self-help intervention for depression with study NHS IAPT site.
  • Over age 18.
  • Adequate English ability.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not suitable for Behavioural Activation guided self-help intervention for depression with study NHS IAPT site.
  • Inadequate English ability.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Treatment as Usual
Participants randomised to the 'treatment as usual' group will receive behavioural activation guided-self help intervention as routinely delivered in the service.
Clients will engage in treatment as usual. This involves low-intensity guided self-help behavioural activation for depression.
Experimental: Treatment with Security Prime
Participants randomised to the experimental group will receive behavioural activation guided self-help intervention as is routinely delivered in the service with additional attachment security priming intervention.

In addition to their treatment as usual (low-intensity guided self-help behavioural activation for depression), participants will complete an initial attachment security priming task during the first session with their allocated clinician. Participants will be prompted in their intervention workbook with a caption regarding what a secure attachment relationship represents. They will be asked to think of a person/ people with whom they feel they have this relationship, and list them. Following this, they are asked to plot these individuals on a diagram of concentric circles in relation to how close they feel this person is to them. The closer to the middle of the diagram the individual places each person, the closer they feel their relationship to that person is.

Prior to each session with their clinician, they will be prompted to complete a repeated security priming task in order to increase feelings of security prior to therapy sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attendance
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment
Number of therapy appointments booked versus number attended for each participant
Up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment
Dropout
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment
Number of participants who drop out of therapy after attending at least one session of treatment
Up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment
Stepping-up to higher intensity services
Time Frame: Up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment
The number of participants in the study who are referred for a higher intensity form of therapy during their low-intensity therapy
Up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9; Kroenke, Spitzer, & Williams, 2001)
Time Frame: Weekly for up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment
Self-report measure of depression with total possible score ranging from 0 to 27. Scores of 0-4 indicate minimal depression; 5-9 indicates mild depression; 10-14 indicates moderate depression; 15-19 indicates moderately severe depression; and 20-17 indicates severe depression.
Weekly for up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7; Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, & Lower, 2006)
Time Frame: Weekly for up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment
Self-report measure of anxiety with total possible scores between 0 to 21. Scores of 0-5 indicate mild anxiety; 6-10 indicates moderate anxiety; 11-15 indicates moderately severe anxiety; and 16-20 indicates severe anxiety.
Weekly for up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS; Mundt, Shear, & Greist, 2002)
Time Frame: Weekly for up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment
Self-report measure of impaired functioning with total possible scores of between 0-20. Scores below 10 are associated with subclinical populations. Scores between 10 and 20 indicate significant functional impairment but less severe clinical symptomatology. Scores above 20 indicate moderately severe or worse psychopathology.
Weekly for up to 8 weeks from the beginning to end of treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: James Walton, Harrogate IAPT Service

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 249633

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Treatment as Usual (Behavioural Activation)

Subscribe