- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04033133
Cerebral Blood Flow and tDCS
Cerebral Blood Flow in People With Multiple Sclerosis During Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
With this study, the investigators will substantiate if regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) is affected by tDCS, assess the amount of CBF change in relation to different currents, and measure differences in regional CBF under stimulation reactivity between healthy subjects and people with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS)using Water O-15 PET (Water Oxygen-15 Positron EmissionTomography) imaging. The objective is to investigate the changes in regional CBF after transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) at different intensities (1 mA, 2 mA, 3 mA, 4 mA) in healthy subjects and PwMS. The design is a cross-sectional proof of principle study in 10 healthy subjects and 10 PwMS.
Relative regional brain CBF (rCBF) will be analyzed semi-quantitatively using voxel-wise and region of interest-based approaches. Changes in CBF associated with tDCS-application will be calculated with a general linear model in a ramp function of the task-specific rCBF, according to previous work in our group using a glucose analogue. Exploratory statistical testing will be done using a paired samples t-test between task and rest conditions and unpaired t-tests between PwMS and healthy controls at the same intensities.
With this study the investigators will be able to dose-dependently measure real-time rCBF changes after non-invasively stimulating the superficial parts of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), a commonly used target in therapeutic tDCS applications. This will provide further insight into whether tDCS is capable of inducing changes in rCBF.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Aim 1: To determine the effects of different stimulation intensities on relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF).
Currently, researchers use tDCS as an interventional modality to modulate the excitability of the brain, with measureable changes in both motor evoked potentials and physical performances. However, because of the relatively large size of most electrodes, and the electrodynamics of the brain, it still remains unclear what specific brain structures are being stimulated and how the mechanics of stimulation (e.g., stimulation penetration and areas affected outside of target area) change with different intensities. The investigators hypothesize that regional CBF at the DLPFC (target area) will increase in a dose-dependent way with greater stimulation intensity. Furthermore, it is hypothesized that the areas surrounding the DLPFC will be increasingly affected by higher stimulation intensities.
Aim 2: To contrast the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on relative cerebral blood flow between healthy subjects and people with Multiple Sclerosis.
PwMS typically present with glucose hypometabolism compared to their healthy peers and because CBF and glucose metabolism are highly coupled, a similar trend in CBF may be expected. Additionally, tDCS has been shown to be effective at increasing cortical excitability and glucose metabolism in both populations. However, what still remains uncertain is if PwMS and healthy subjects experience the same amount of increased activity for the same stimulation intensity. The investigators hypothesize that PwMS will experience a greater increase in rCBF at the DLPFC and surrounding areas than healthy controls for the same stimulation intensity.
Aim 3: To extend our understanding of the safety and efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation at higher current intensities for healthy subjects and people with Multiple Sclerosis.
Despite some work on the feasibility and safety of performing tDCS at intensities > 2 mA (i.e., up to 4 mA), the convention for most tDCS studies is to use intensities less than or equal to 2 mA. This has been sufficient to illicit measurable effects in both excitability and performance outcomes. However, the potential benefits of increasing intensity to either enhance the effects of a given stimulation protocol (e.g., time or magnitude) or to potentially access deeper brain areas justifies further exploration of current intensities > 2 mA. It is also important to add to the safety protocol of higher intensities in healthy and clinical (e.g., PwMS) subjects. The investigators hypothesize that higher intensities (i.e., > 2 mA) will be well tolerated by both healthy subjects and PwMS. Additionally, the investigators hypothesize no serious adverse effects from higher stimulation intensities. The existing side-effects of tDCS at intensities less than or equal to 2 mA include low-grade occurrences of tingling, itching, and burning sensation at the electrode sites; a few subjects have reported short-lived (< 5 min) headaches. In a study testing the safety of higher intensities similar to those proposed here, these same side-effects were observed in 50% of the subjects. This rate of occurrence is slightly higher than studies using less than or equal to 2 mA, but the magnitudes of the negative effects were still well within safely tolerable limits and were all transient in nature.
I.6 Background and significance and/or Preliminary studies related to this project.
(do not indicate "see protocol") Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive and well-tolerated brain stimulation technique (1-4) that can modulate the cortical excitability of targeted brain regions (5) as well as cerebral blood flow (6) in a polarity-dependent manner.
Models of tDCS current flow (7,8) and findings from studies in which human functional magnetic resonance Imaging (fMRI) has been used to measure brain activity (9-11) suggest that tDCS can alter processing across large areas of the cortex. In this sense, the effects of tDCS are likely to be relatively broad. Thus, while the neural changes induced by tDCS are concentrated around regions of cortex closest to the electrodes (12), broader networks of functionally-connected regions may also be recruited (9,10,13,14). Furthermore, no systematic investigation has been done to determine the most efficacious current intensity for PwMS.
There is empirical evidence that tDCS with current intensity between 1 and 2 mA for 20-40 minutes for either single or multiple sessions can safely and effectively be administered to PwMS (15-20). Although tDCS with current intensities > 2 mA are considered safe 21, no studies have investigated how brain activity is affected during tDCS at intensities > 2 mA. Although the safety of higher intensity tDCS in PwMS may be initially assumed from previous work using subjects who have experienced a stroke (21), it has also been suggested that more studies on the safety of higher intensity stimulation in other populations are needed in order to exercise due diligence before widely prescribing intensities greater than the present convention (22).
The cerebral activation in PwMS has been investigated with [15O] water and with [15O] O2 PET (indexes oxygen metabolism)(23). Widespread reductions in cerebral blood flow and oxygen metabolism in both gray and white mater have been reported in PwMS (24). Furthermore, these studies indicate that the degree of oxygen metabolism reduction correlated with worse cognitive performance and expanded disability status scale (EDSS), and that the degree of cerebral oxygen hypometabolism was associated with the number of relapses (25).
A close coupling of perfusion and metabolism is assumed, reflecting oxidative phosphorylation of glucose as the predominant source of energy production. Consequently, CBF is often considered as an indirect measure of neuronal function and integrity (26). This is supported by the significant association of metabolism with regional CBF (rCBF) across different brain regions (27,28), and with global CBF (gCBF) across varying states of consciousness (29).
With this study, the investigators will be able to substantiate if rCBF is affected by tDCS, assess the amount of signal change in relation to different currents, and measure differences in CBF distribution under stimulation reactivity between healthy subjects and PwMS. The objective is to investigate the changes in rCBF after transcranial direct current stimulation at different intensities (1 mA, 2 mA, 3 mA, 4 mA) in healthy subjects and PwMS. The design is a cross-sectional proof of principle study in 10 healthy subjects and 10 PwMS.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Iowa
-
Iowa City, Iowa, United States, 52242
- Department of Health and Human Physiology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Confirmed diagnosis of multiple sclerosis by a neurologist
- No change in MS-specific medication (disease modification drugs) in the last three months
- Healthy enough to complete the protocol based on information obtained from a clinical exam and past medical history.
- An expanded disability status scale (EDSS) below 5.5
- Comprehension of the protocol as indicated by an ability to respond to questions about the study after reading the consent form.
- Able to use and be contacted by telephone
- Able to speak, read, and understand English, and complete a questionnaire in English
- Body mass index <30 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria:
- A relapse of disease symptoms in the last three months
- History / presence of secondary conditions such as seizure disorders (or on medications known to lower seizure threshold), hydrocephalus, diabetes mellitus, or claustrophobia
- Alcohol dependence or abuse (>2 drinks/day), or present history (last six months) of drug abuse
- History of significant traumatic brain injury or hydrocephalus
- Currently pregnant
- Recent hospitalization (within the last 3 months) or enforced bed rest/sedentary state
- Claustrophobia
A subject will be excluded if he/she has a contraindication to Magnetic Resonance scanning, e.g., implanted metal clips or wires, which may concentrate radiofrequency fields or cause tissue damage from twisting in a magnetic field.
Examples include:
- Aneurysm clip
- Implanted neural stimulator
- Implanted cardiac pacemaker or autodefibrillator
- Cochlear implant
- Ocular foreign body (e.g., metal shavings)
- Any implanted device (pumps, infusion devices, etc.)
- Shrapnel injuries
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Multiple Sclerosis
People with MS get tDCS with different intensities.
|
Subjects will get tDCS at intensities of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 mA.
|
Active Comparator: Healthy Subjects
Healthy subjects get tDCS with different intensities.
|
Subjects will get tDCS at intensities of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 mA.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Cerebral Blood Flow
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Cerebral Blood flow will be measured while subjects undergo tDCS at different intensities in the PET scanner.
|
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201905826
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandSwiss National Science FoundationRecruitingMultiple Sclerosis (MS) | Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) | Secondary-progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SPMS) | Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PPMS)Switzerland
-
University of California, Los AngelesUnknownRelapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary-progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Primary-progressive Multiple SclerosisUnited States
-
BiogenCompletedMultiple Sclerosis | Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Multiple Sclerosis, Primary Progressive | Multiple Sclerosis, Remittent ProgressiveJapan
-
The Cleveland ClinicUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterCompletedRelapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Progressive Relapsing Multiple SclerosisUnited States
-
Rigshospitalet, DenmarkOdense University Hospital; Aarhus University Hospital; Hvidovre University Hospital and other collaboratorsRecruitingRelapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisDenmark
-
University of California, San FranciscoUnited States Department of DefenseRecruitingMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive | Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting | Multiple Sclerosis (MS) | Multiple Sclerosis Relapse | Multiple Sclerosis, Primary Progressive | Multiple Sclerosis Brain Lesion | Multiple Sclerosis BenignUnited States
-
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiColumbia University; New York Stem Cell Foundation Research InstituteCompletedClinically Isolated Syndrome | Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisUnited States
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalMassachusetts General HospitalRecruitingMultiple Sclerosis | Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis | Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisUnited States
-
University of MinnesotaMallinckrodtTerminatedPrimary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Progressive Relapsing Multiple SclerosisUnited States
-
Queen Mary University of LondonTakeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.RecruitingRelapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis | Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis | Secondary Progressive Multiple SclerosisUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on tDCS
-
Hôpital le VinatierCompletedSchizophrenia | Auditory HallucinationsFrance, Tunisia
-
Universidad de AlmeriaSecretaría General de Universidades, Investigación y Tecnología, Junta de...Enrolling by invitationSubstance-Related DisordersSpain
-
Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts General Hospital; National Institute on Aging (NIA)Unknown
-
Nachum Soroker, MDUnknown
-
Bambino Gesù Hospital and Research InstituteCompleted
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedMotor Activity | Motor NeuroplasticityUnited States
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedMigraine With Aura | CADASIL | Cerebral Microangiopathy | ICA StenosisGermany
-
Universidade Federal de PernambucoCompleted
-
Thorsten RudroffTerminatedMultiple Sclerosis | Neuropathic PainUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed