The Analgesic Efficacy of the Pectoral Nerves Block Versus Local Anesthetic Infiltration After Mastectomy (PECS)

October 3, 2019 updated by: Hôpital du Valais

The Analgesic Efficacy of the Pectoral Nerves Block Versus Local Anesthetic Infiltration After Mastectomy: a Randomized, Controlled, Double Blinded Trial

This trial will include patients undergoing radical mastectomy under general anesthesia. One group of patients will receive a pectoral nerve block, done by the anesthetist under ultrasound guidance at the beginning of the invervention. The other group will receive the a wound infiltration at the end of the intervention, done by the surgeon. Investigators will compare acute pain-related outcomes and chronic pain at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

Mastectomies are associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. In addition to general anesthesia, different methods of locoregional anesthesia exist to treat postoperative pain, amongst others a pectoral nerve block. This block consists in injecting local anesthetic between the muscles of the thoracic wall and is done under ultrasound guidance. Over the last few years, the pectoral nerves block has become a recognized option for the treatment of acute post-mastectomy pain and it is routinely performed in addition to general anesthesia.

Data indicates that pectoral nerve blocks are effective for the treatment of postoperative pain during the first 24 hours after mastectomy, when compared to no block. However, the analgesic efficacy of a pectoral nerve block has never systematically compared to that of wound infiltration with local anesthetics, done by the surgeon at the end of the intervention. Such an infiltration is also currently employed.

In our study randomize patients undergoing mastectomy under general anesthesia will be randomized to receive either an ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block with 30 mL of local anesthetic (group PECS) or a wound infiltration with 30 mL of local anesthetic (group infiltration).

Investigators will assess different pain-related outcomes over the first 24 postoperative hours, together with potential block-related side effects and patient satisfaction. Chronic postoperative pain at 3 and 6 months postoperatively will also be assessed.

Both patients and outcome assessors will be blinded to group allocation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing unilateral mastectomy
  • American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status I-III
  • Age ≥ 18

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to regional anesthesia, such as infection at the surgical site
  • Pregnancy
  • History of alcohol or drug dependence/abuse
  • History of long term opioid intake
  • Chronic pain disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PECS block
Ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve block with bupivacaine 0.5 % 30 mL before surgical incision
Ultrasound-guided PECS block before surgical incision with 30 mL bupivacaine 0.5 %
Active Comparator: Wound infiltration
Wound infiltration with bupivacaine 0.5 % 30 mL at the end of surgery
Wound infiltration at the end of surgery with with 30 mL bupivacaine 0.5 %

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morphine consumption
Time Frame: first 24 postoperative hours
Cumulative intravenous morphine consumption (mg)
first 24 postoperative hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score at rest at 2 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 2 hours postoperatively
Numeric rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable pain
2 hours postoperatively
Pain score at rest at 12 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively
Numeric rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable pain
12 hours postoperatively
Pain score at rest at 24 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Numeric rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable pain
24 hours postoperatively
Pain score on movement at 2 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 2 hours postoperatively
Numeric rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable pain
2 hours postoperatively
Pain score on movement at 12 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 12 hours postoperatively
Numeric rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable pain
12 hours postoperatively
Pain score on movement at 24 hours postoperatively
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Numeric rating scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable pain
24 hours postoperatively
Time to first analgesic request
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Time between end of surgery and first analgesic request by patient, in minutes
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sina Grape, Hopital du Valais

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

November 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 2, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PECS 2019

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on PECS block

3
Subscribe