Risk Stratification With Chest CT to Rule-out Suspected SARS-CoV-2 Infections (SCout)

September 17, 2021 updated by: Ulf Teichgräber, Jena University Hospital

Risk Stratification With Chest Computed Tomography to Rule-out Suspected SARS-CoV-2 Infections of Unspecific Symptomatic Patients Before Hospital Admission

The study objective is to investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with comparison to RT-PCR assay in COVID-19 in patients which were stratified for hospital admission.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

To prevent spreading of the new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) from patients who are infected but in whom infection was not detected by means of Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and who are to be admitted to ordinary wards of hospitals, we aimed to determine validity of exclusion of pneumonia immediately before admission by means of chest computed tomography.

Patients admitted to the emergency department of the university hospital Jena with Covid-19 symptoms (temperature > 37.5°C; respiratory and/or gastrointestinal symptoms) whose RT-PCR test resulted negative, undergo a chest CT scan. Those patients without pulmonary infiltrates can be safely ruled out for Covid-19. Thus, CT has perfect selectivity evidence regarding pulmonary infiltrates; it has limited selectivity concerning the pathogenesis of the infiltration.

The study objective is to investigate the diagnostic value and consistency of chest CT as compared with comparison to RT-PCR assay in COVID-19 in patients which were stratified for hospital admission.

The hypothesis is that chest CT has the greatest clinical evidence (no detection of lung infiltration) when the RT-PCT is tested negative. We assume that chest CT has a high sensitivity for diagnosis of respiratory dominant COVID-19. A pulmonary COVID-19 in epidemic areas can be best ruled out when chest CT is negative for the presence of infiltrations of the lung parenchyma. This is described by the SNOUT principle which is an acronym for 'Sensitive test when Negative rules OUT the disease' under the condition of a low pretest probability.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

145

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Thuringia
      • Jena, Thuringia, Germany, 07747
        • Jena University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with unspecific symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection who are to be admitted to hospital for any disease and who provide written informed consent to undergo rt-PCR, chest CT, and antibody test.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥ 18 years
  • Provided written informed consent
  • Intended hospital admission for any reason
  • Symptoms that suggest infection with SARS-CoV-2
  • Participant agrees to rt PCR and antibody test (SARS-CoV-2)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 18 years
  • Pregnancy cannot be excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in detecting pneumonia in unspecific symptomatic patients who are to be admitted to hospital and who are rt-PCR negative for SARS-CoV-2.
Time Frame: At hospital admission
Positive likelihood ratio (LR+) Negative likelihood ratio (LR-)
At hospital admission

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in patients with pulmonary comorbidities
Time Frame: At hospital admission
Sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in detecting pneumonia in unspecific symptomatic patients with pulmonary comorbidities who are to be admitted to hospital and who are rt-PCR negative for SARS-CoV-2.
At hospital admission
Sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities
Time Frame: At hospital admission
Sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in detecting pneumonia in unspecific symptomatic patients with cardiovascular comorbidities who are to be admitted to hospital and who are rt-PCR negative for SARS-CoV-2.
At hospital admission
Sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in patients with malignancy
Time Frame: At hospital admission
Sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in detecting pneumonia in unspecific symptomatic patients with malignancy who are to be admitted to hospital and who are rt-PCR negative for infection with SARS-CoV-2.
At hospital admission
Sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in patients with immunodeficiency
Time Frame: At hospital admission
Sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in detecting pneumonia in unspecific symptomatic patients with immunodeficiency who are to be admitted to hospital and who are rt-PCR negative for SARS-CoV-2.
At hospital admission

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictive value of specific chest CT findings for detection of SARS-CoV-2
Time Frame: At hospital admission
Predictive value of chest CT
At hospital admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ulf Teichgräber, Prof. Dr., Department of Radiology, Jena University Hospital, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is not a plan to make IPD available.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

Clinical Trials on CT-imaging

Subscribe