A Guided Internet Intervention for Women Treated for Gynecological Cancer (GYNEA)

August 24, 2021 updated by: Haukeland University Hospital
Gynecological cancers are the sixth most common cancer forms and the number of survivors is increasing as a consequence of more efficient treatment and longer life span. As part of regulary care after cancer treatment the women have five years of follow-up with the primary focus on recurrence, aiming to increase survival. However, several studies have shown that there is no evidence for this assumption on increased survival (ref). There are now suggested alternative perspectives in the follow up period targeting late effects, health-related quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction with care.The main aim of the current study is to test the feasibility and acceptability of an internet-based psychosocial intervention for women treated with curative intent gynecological cancer. Another aim is to test the perceived effect on gynecological cancer survivors health-related self-care and QoL.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study's objectives and research questions Research questions

  1. How did the participants use the program?

    1. What are the barriers and facilitators concerning technologies of the internet-based self -management intervention?
    2. Number of logins
    3. How much time did the participants spend on the program (per login )
    4. Number of modules completed, number of home-work and mindfulness assignment completed
    5. Type of errors made …
  2. What is the participants' perceived credibility of the program?
  3. How do the participants experience the guided psychosocial digital intervention?

    1. How do participants experience the cancer trajectory, their every-day lives and health-related QoL post-treatment gynaecological cancer (before the intervention)?
    2. How do the participants experience the internet-based intervention regarding content, the home-work assignments, and the mindfulness assignments, the active participation?
    3. How do the participants experience the telephone-contact and follow-ups with the nurse once a week?
    4. Which factors do they describe as important for their satisfaction and dissatisfaction
  4. How is the perceived effect on the gynecological cancer survivors' competence, QoL, self-care and coping?

It is hypothesized that an internet-based psycho-social intervention will support women in developing self-competence and self-care which could be measured as increased QOL and secondarily affect the impact of cancer, distress, anxiety, depression, self-esteem, and self-reported ability to monitor and respond to symptoms of recurrence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Ragnhild Sekse

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  • have had gyneocological cancer
  • maximum 1 year after gynecological cancer

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe medical or psychiatric condition
  • relapse of gynecological cancer

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: GYNEA- digital coping program
Participants randomized to this arm will receive active treatment after the inclusion
6 modules with relevant information and tools for coping after cancer
Other Names:
  • waiting list
No Intervention: Waiting list
6 weeks waiting list before crossing over to GYNEA- digital coping program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Impact of Cancer version 2
Time Frame: up to 26 weeks
Designed to assess the physical and psychosocial health experience of cancer survivors through its positive and negative impacts. 47-item questionnaire organized into 4 positive (altruism and empathy (AE), health awareness (HA), meaning of cancer (MOC), positive self-evaluation (PSE)) and 4 negative (appearance concerns (AC), body change concerns (BCC), life interference (LI) and worry (W)) impact dimensions [13] corresponding to the first 37 items. The questionnaire also includes 10 additional items constituting conditional dimensions applicable to subsets of survivors assessing employment concerns (EC), relationship concerns for individuals with a partner (P), and relationship concerns for those without a partner (NP). All items are scored on a five-point scale from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. A higher score on a dimension implies stronger endorsement of that content area
up to 26 weeks
The Quality of Life Patient/Cancer Survivor Version
Time Frame: up to 26 weeks
ordinal questionnaire measuring the quality of life in cancer patients over 42 items rated on 10 point Likert-type scale. The revised instrument included 41 items representing the four domains of quality of life incorporating physical, psychological, social, and spiritual well being.
up to 26 weeks
Patient Health Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 26 weeks
Subjects indicated for each of the nine depressive symptoms (corresponding to the criteria ofDSM-IV) whether, during the previous 2 weeks, the symptom has bothered them: 0=not at all; 1=several days; 2=more than half of the days; 3=nearly every day.
up to 26 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 26, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 9612

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on GYNEA- digital coping program for women after gynaecological cancer

Subscribe