- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04556448
RCT Comparing Invisalign and Traditional Orthodontic Treatment
September 18, 2020 updated by: Peter H. Buschang, Texas A&M University
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Invisalign and Traditional Orthodontic Treatments
Comparison of orthodontic patients treated with aligners and traditional (clear braces)
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Patients were selected based on being adults and having mild Class I malocclusion.
They were randomly allocated into either the aligner group and the traditiona (clear braces group)..
The aligner group was treated with invisalign, with up to two adjustments at the end of treatment.
The traditional group had clear braces placed on their teeth.
The outcome variables including the following: 1) pain and discomfort related to treatment, 2) posttreatment occlusal status, and 3) postretention occlusal status.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
78
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
- Texas A&M Baylor College of Dentisry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
17 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Class I molar and canine relationships
- Non-extraction treatments
- Mandibular crowding of 4 mm or less
- No missing tooth (from second to second molar)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Anterior or posterior crossbites
- Anterior or lateral open bites
- Maxillary overjet exceeding 3mm
- Impacted tooth
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Aligners
Invisalign treatment
|
Clear aligners
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Traditional braces
Clear braces
|
Clear braces
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Occlusal changes
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Differences in occlusion between the two groups
|
up to 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Peter Buschang, PhD, TAMU Health Science Center
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2019
Study Completion (Actual)
March 1, 2019
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 18, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
September 21, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 21, 2020
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 18, 2020
Last Verified
September 1, 2020
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2012-21_COD_Ortho1
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Malocclusion, Angle Class II
-
AL YousefKing Abdullah International Medical Research CenterUnknownMalocclusion, Angle Class I | Malocclusion; Angle Class II Division 1Saudi Arabia
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakUnknownAngle Class II, Division 1 MalocclusionIndia
-
State University of New York at BuffaloCompletedDental Malocclusion | Crowding, Tooth | Angle Class II | Angle Class IUnited States
-
mahmoud abdelhameed mohamedCompleted
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompleted3D Evaluation of Powerscope Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Malocclusion (Powerscope app)Class II Malocclusion, Division 1Egypt
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion, Division 1Egypt
-
Al-Azhar UniversityRecruitingOrthodontic Appliance Complication, Angle Class II Patients, DistalizationEgypt
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompletedBimaxillary Protrusion | Angle Class II, Division 1 | Dental MalocclusionsEgypt
-
FCI SystemTerminatedMalocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1France
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedAngle Class IISyrian Arab Republic
Clinical Trials on Aligners
-
Mohammed H ElnagarRecruitingMalocclusion | Misaligned TeethUnited States
-
Riyadh Elm UniversityActive, not recruitingOrthodontic Appliance Complication | Taste Perception | Fixed Orthodontic AppliancesSaudi Arabia
-
University of PaviaRecruiting
-
University Hospital, GenevaNot yet recruiting
-
Cairo UniversityUnknownRemovable Aligners, Conventional BracketsEgypt
-
Medical University of ViennaRecruitingQuality of Life | Orthodontic Appliances | Orthodontics | Surveys and QuestionnairesAustria
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedCrowding | Malocclusion, Angle Class I | Malocclusion; Displaced or Missing TeethSyrian Arab Republic
-
Al-Azhar UniversityEnrolling by invitation
-
University of Rome Tor VergataCompleted