The Effect of Body Mass Index (BMI) on Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation Outcome: A Prospective Study From an East-Asian Cohort

November 10, 2020 updated by: Jong Sze Chin, Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Research has shown that rehabilitation at almost any Body Mass Index (BMI) level leads to positive functional outcomes. Some data demonstrating that gains are often more rapid at BMI above "normal". The aim of this study is to investigate the association between BMI and the functional progress of all patients admitted to Tan Tock Seng Tertiary Rehabilitation Center.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

247

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 570186
        • Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patient admitted to Tan Tock Seng Tertiary Rehabilitation Centre and fulfilled the inclusion criteria within the study period will be consented to the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical strokes (ischaemic or haemorrhagic) diagnosed by acute neurologists or neurosurgeons and confirmed on computerized tomography (CT) or Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain imaging
  • aged 18 years and above
  • admitted directly from acute stroke units
  • able to provide informed consent by self or by next of kin in incompetence patient
  • must receive physical therapy (either physiotherapy, occupational therapy or speech therapy) at least 5 times a week with each session at least 30 minutes

Exclusion Criteria:

  • rehabilitation was not the primary reason for the inpatient admission
  • failure to complete the rehabilitation program due to either an acute transfer off rehabilitation or a discharge against medical advice
  • incomplete or missing Body Mass Index (BMI) or Functional Independence Measure (FIM) data
  • patients who were not of Asian ethnicity

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) on Admission
Time Frame: Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was measured within 72 hours of admission
Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the main primary outcome measure during rehabilitation was measured within 72 hours of admission and discharge by rehabilitation therapists all of whom were trained and certified in the use of the FIM. The FIM is an 18-item instrument comprising 13 motor items and 5 cognitive items, with each item graded on a 7-point ordinal scale (1 denotes complete dependence and 7 denotes complete independence), including the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) across 6 areas (self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition). Total admission FIM (Ta-FIM) scores, total discharge FIM (Td-FIM) scores (18 - 126), motor FIM (m-FIM) sub-scores (13 - 91) and cognitive FIM (c-FIM) sub-scores (5 - 35), were tabulated.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was measured within 72 hours of admission
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) on Discharge
Time Frame: Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was measured within 72 hours of discharge.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the main primary outcome measure during rehabilitation was measured within 72 hours of admission and discharge by rehabilitation therapists all of whom were trained and certified in the use of the FIM. The FIM is an 18-item instrument comprising 13 motor items and 5 cognitive items, with each item graded on a 7-point ordinal scale (1 denotes complete dependence and 7 denotes complete independence), including the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) across 6 areas (self-care, sphincter control, transfers, locomotion, communication, and social cognition). Total admission FIM (Ta-FIM) scores, total discharge FIM (Td-FIM) scores (18 - 126), motor FIM (m-FIM) sub-scores (13 - 91) and cognitive FIM (c-FIM) sub-scores (5 - 35), were tabulated.
Functional Independence Measure (FIM) was measured within 72 hours of discharge.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Gain
Time Frame: Within 72 hours
Mean FIM gain, calculated as [Td-FIM - Ta-FIM] points
Within 72 hours
Mean Functional Independence Measure (FIM) efficiency
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mean FIM efficiency, calculated as [FIM gain]/ [rehabilitation length of stay (days)]
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Mean Functional Independence Measure (FIM) effectiveness
Time Frame: Within 72 hours
Mean FIM effectiveness was calculated as FIM gain/(126 points-FIM admission scores) with a value of 0-1.
Within 72 hours
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: Within 72 hours
All patients had their weight (in kilograms) and height (in meters) measured on admission and discharge by rehabilitation nurses 72 hours after rehabilitation admission and prior to planned rehabilitation discharge. Weight was measured via sitting weighing scales or platform weighing scale for bedbound patients while height was measured with height measuring scale or measured in a supine position with legs outstretched and feet in dorsiflexion at end of bed for bedbound patients. BMI is then calculated as weight /height in meters squared.
Within 72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: SZE CHIN JONG, MD, Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 30, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 12, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 10, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on No intervention

Subscribe