- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04639297
NeuroVision vs Standard Neuromonitoring
NeruoVision Versus Standard Hospital Neuromonitoring, Influence on the Rate of Neurologic Injury Following Spine Surgery? A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Elective spinal surgery for the correction of degenerative spinal pathology may involve significant intraoperative risks that can influence postoperative neurologic outcomes. Spinal cord monitoring had made it possible to track the spine and nerve root sensory and motor tracts. This has improved the ability to conduct minimally invasive surgery by allowing surgeons to operate without direct visualization of the neurologic elements.
Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the spinal cord is primarily accomplished by both somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs). Due to a shortage in personnel trained to evaluate neuro-monitoring results, surgeon-driven systems have been established. An example of a surgeon driven monitoring system is NeuroVision®, which interacts with the surgeon during the operation by providing real-time visible and auditory tcMEP and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) waveforms. This stands in comparison to hospital based methods of IONM.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
- Recruiting
- Rush University Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Kern Singh, MD
- Phone Number: 3124322888
- Email: singh.research@rushortho.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing a primary single or multilevel lateral spinal surgery procedures for degenerative pathology Diagnosis: myelopathy, radiculopathy, myeloradiculopathy, central stenosis, foraminal stenosis herniated nucleus pulposus, degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, and osteophytic complexes
- Patients able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active infection
- Active or history of malignancy
- Spinal traumatic injury within the past 2 years
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: NeuroVision® IONM
Patients scheduled to undergo a primary single or multilevel lateral spinal surgery procedures for non-trauma condition.
Use of NeuroVision® IONM in lateral spine surgery to provide real-time visible and auditory tcMEP and CMAP waveforms.
|
Using NeuroVision® prior to surgery SSEP and tcMEP and values are recorded.
A deficit of SSEP tracking is defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 10% or a latency increase more than 50%.
Similarly, a CMAP amplitude reduction demonstrates problematic tcMEP monitoring.
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional hospital based IONM
Patients scheduled to undergo a primary single or multilevel lateral spinal surgery procedures for non-trauma condition.
Use of hospital based IONM in lateral spine surgery to provide real-time visible and auditory tcMEP and CMAP waveforms.
|
Using hospital based IONM prior to surgery SSEP and tcMEP and values are recorded.
A deficit of SSEP tracking is defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 10% or a latency increase more than 50%.
Similarly, a CMAP amplitude reduction demonstrates problematic tcMEP monitoring.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of new-onset neurological injury
Time Frame: Enrollment up to 2 years postoperatively
|
Decreased somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and transcranial MEPs (tcMEPs)
|
Enrollment up to 2 years postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cost analysis of IONM use
Time Frame: Enrollment up to 1 month post-operative
|
Difference in costs of hospital IONM and Neurovision
|
Enrollment up to 1 month post-operative
|
|
False positive and false negative events in each modality
Time Frame: Intraoperatively up to 1 day post-operative
|
Incorrect labeling of SSEP, tcMEP, and surface electromyography (sEMG) signals
|
Intraoperatively up to 1 day post-operative
|
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Postoperative to documented progress assessed up to 2 months
|
Post-operative nausea and vomiting, Gastro-esophageal reflux, ileus, urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolic events, Respiratory depression/airway compromise,m renal insufficiency, wound complications
|
Postoperative to documented progress assessed up to 2 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 19121607
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.