NeuroVision vs Standard Neuromonitoring

April 1, 2026 updated by: Kern Singh, MD, Rush University Medical Center

NeruoVision Versus Standard Hospital Neuromonitoring, Influence on the Rate of Neurologic Injury Following Spine Surgery? A Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to perform a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial to assess the utility of IONM in patients undergoing primary, single or multilevel lateral spinal procedures. Subjects will be randomized to undergo a lateral spine surgery with the use of NeuroVision® IONM or conventional hospital based IONM to assess incidence of new-onset neurological injury.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Elective spinal surgery for the correction of degenerative spinal pathology may involve significant intraoperative risks that can influence postoperative neurologic outcomes. Spinal cord monitoring had made it possible to track the spine and nerve root sensory and motor tracts. This has improved the ability to conduct minimally invasive surgery by allowing surgeons to operate without direct visualization of the neurologic elements.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the spinal cord is primarily accomplished by both somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEPs). Due to a shortage in personnel trained to evaluate neuro-monitoring results, surgeon-driven systems have been established. An example of a surgeon driven monitoring system is NeuroVision®, which interacts with the surgeon during the operation by providing real-time visible and auditory tcMEP and compound muscle action potential (CMAP) waveforms. This stands in comparison to hospital based methods of IONM.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

148

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing a primary single or multilevel lateral spinal surgery procedures for degenerative pathology Diagnosis: myelopathy, radiculopathy, myeloradiculopathy, central stenosis, foraminal stenosis herniated nucleus pulposus, degenerative disc disease, spondylosis, and osteophytic complexes
  • Patients able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active infection
  • Active or history of malignancy
  • Spinal traumatic injury within the past 2 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: NeuroVision® IONM
Patients scheduled to undergo a primary single or multilevel lateral spinal surgery procedures for non-trauma condition. Use of NeuroVision® IONM in lateral spine surgery to provide real-time visible and auditory tcMEP and CMAP waveforms.
Using NeuroVision® prior to surgery SSEP and tcMEP and values are recorded. A deficit of SSEP tracking is defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 10% or a latency increase more than 50%. Similarly, a CMAP amplitude reduction demonstrates problematic tcMEP monitoring.
Active Comparator: Conventional hospital based IONM
Patients scheduled to undergo a primary single or multilevel lateral spinal surgery procedures for non-trauma condition. Use of hospital based IONM in lateral spine surgery to provide real-time visible and auditory tcMEP and CMAP waveforms.
Using hospital based IONM prior to surgery SSEP and tcMEP and values are recorded. A deficit of SSEP tracking is defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 10% or a latency increase more than 50%. Similarly, a CMAP amplitude reduction demonstrates problematic tcMEP monitoring.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of new-onset neurological injury
Time Frame: Enrollment up to 2 years postoperatively
Decreased somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and transcranial MEPs (tcMEPs)
Enrollment up to 2 years postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cost analysis of IONM use
Time Frame: Enrollment up to 1 month post-operative
Difference in costs of hospital IONM and Neurovision
Enrollment up to 1 month post-operative
False positive and false negative events in each modality
Time Frame: Intraoperatively up to 1 day post-operative
Incorrect labeling of SSEP, tcMEP, and surface electromyography (sEMG) signals
Intraoperatively up to 1 day post-operative
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Postoperative to documented progress assessed up to 2 months
Post-operative nausea and vomiting, Gastro-esophageal reflux, ileus, urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolic events, Respiratory depression/airway compromise,m renal insufficiency, wound complications
Postoperative to documented progress assessed up to 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 28, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe