World Health Organization (WHO) COVID-19 Solidarity Trial for COVID-19 Treatments (SOLIDARITY)

May 10, 2021 updated by: The University of The West Indies

WHO Public Health Emergency "Solidarity" Clinical Trial for COVID-19 Treatments

In early 2020 there were no approved anti-viral treatments for COVID19 Infection. The SOLIDARITY trial is a multicentre adaptive international randomised trial sponsored by Word Health Organization to determine the efficacy of Remdesivir (daily infusion for 10 days), or Acalabrutinib (orally twice daily for 10 days), or Interferon β1a(daily injection for 6 days) compared with local standard of care in patients admitted to hospital for COVID19 infection on all-cause mortality, stratified by severity of disease at the time of randomisation. The major secondary outcomes are duration of hospital stay and time to first receiving ventilation (or intensive care).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Terminology: The novel coronavirus-induced disease first described in 2019 in China is designated COVID-19 (or COVID), and the pathogen itself (an RNA virus) is SARS-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).

Background: In early 2020 there were no approved anti-viral treatments for COVID, and WHO expert groups advised that four re-purposed drugs, Remdesivir, Lopinavir (given with Ritonavir, to slow hepatic degradation), Interferon (β1a), and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) should be evaluated in an international randomised trial. In addition, WHO provided guidelines that local physicians may consider when COVID-19 is suspected on clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection. However, following an interim analyses, the interim results of HCQ vs standard of care and lopinavir/ritonavir vs standard of care from the Solidarity/Discovery trials, the Solidarity trial Executive Group decided to stop the HCQ and the Lopinavir/ritonavir arms on the 3rd of July, 2020 due to futility; leaving 3 arms, i.e., remdesivir, Interferon (β1a), and standard of care.

On the 6th of August 2020, due to a review of the rationale and clinical evidence, the Executive Group of the Steering Committee of the Solidarity trial recommended that a new arm should be opened in the Solidarity trial, to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Acalabrutinib.

Simplicity of procedures: To facilitate collaboration even in hospitals that have become overloaded, patient enrolment and randomisation (via the internet) and all other trial procedures are greatly simplified, and no paperwork at all is required. Once a hospital has obtained approval, electronic entry of patients who have given informed consent takes only a few minutes. At the end of it, the randomly allocated treatment is displayed on the screen and confirmed by electronic messaging.

Randomisation: Adults (age ≥18 years) recently hospitalised, or already in hospital, with definite COVID and, in the view of the responsible doctor, no contra-indication to any of the study drugs will be randomly allocated between

  • Local standard of care alone, OR local standard of care plus one of
  • Remdesivir (daily infusion for 10 days)
  • Acalabrutinib (orally twice daily for 10 days)
  • Interferon β1a(daily injection for 6 days).

Data reported before randomisation: Information is entered electronically on

  • Country, hospital (from a list of approved hospitals) and randomising doctor
  • Confirmation that informed consent has been obtained
  • Patient identifiers, age and sex
  • Patient characteristics (yes/no): current smoking, diabetes, heart disease, chronic lung disease, chronic liver disease, asthma, HIV infection, active tuberculosis.
  • COVID-19 severity at entry (yes/no): shortness of breath, being given oxygen, already on a ventilator, and, if lungs imaged, major bilateral abnormality (infiltrations/patchy shadowing)
  • Whether any of the study drugs are currently NOT AVAILABLE at the hospital.

Exclusion from study entry: Patients will not be randomised if, in the view of the randomising doctor, ANY of the AVAILABLE study drugs are contra-indicated (e.g., because of patient characteristics, chronic liver or heart disease, or some concurrent medication).

Changing management of study patients: At all times the patient's medical team remains solely responsible for decisions about that patient's care and safety. Hence, if the team decide that deviation from the randomly allocated treatment arm is definitely necessary, this should be done.

Follow-up: When patients die or are discharged, follow-up ceases and it is reported:

  • Which study drugs were given (and for how many days)
  • Whether ventilation or intensive care was received (and, if so, when it began)
  • Date of discharge, or date and cause of death while still in hospital. If no report is received within 6 weeks of study entry, an electronic reminder is sent.

Drug safety: Suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions that are life-threatening (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome, anaphylaxis, aplastic anaemia, or anything comparably uncommon and serious) must be reported within 24 hours of being diagnosed, without waiting for death or discharge.

Major outcomes: The primary outcome is all-cause mortality, subdivided by severity of disease at the time of randomisation. The major secondary outcomes are duration of hospital stay and time to first receiving ventilation (or intensive care).

Data monitoring: A global Data and Safety Monitoring Committee will keep the accumulating drug safety results and major outcome results under regular review.

Numbers entered: The larger the number entered the more accurate the results will be, but numbers entered will depend on how the epidemic develops. If substantial numbers get hospitalised in the participating centres, it may be possible to enter several thousand hospitalised patients with relatively mild disease and a few thousand with severe disease, but realistic, appropriate sample sizes could not be estimated at the start of the trial and will depend on the evolution of the epidemic.

Heterogeneity between populations: If a study treatment does affect outcome, then this effect could well differ between patients who had severe disease when randomised and those who had less severe disease. It could also differ between younger and older patients, or between patients in one or another country. If sufficient numbers are randomised, it may be possible to obtain statistically reliable treatment comparisons within each of several different countries or types of patient.

Adaptive design: The WHO may decide to add novel treatment arms while the trial is in progress. Conversely, the WHO may decide to discontinue some treatment arms, especially if the Global Data and Safety Monitoring Committee reports, based on interim analyses, that one of the trial treatments definitely affects mortality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kingston, Jamaica, 7
        • Univeristy of the West Indies
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Marvin E Reid, MB BS PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Naydenne Williams, MBBS DM

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • consenting adults (age ≥18) hospitalised with definite COVID-19
  • Patients without known allergy or contra-indications to any of the of the therapies and without anticipated transfer within 72 hours to a non- study hospital.
  • Patients admitted to a collaborating hospital Exclusion Criteria
  • AVAILABLE study drugs are contra-indicated (e.g., because of patient characteristics, chronic liver or heart disease, or some concurrent medication).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Local Standard of Care
Treatment according to local hospital protocol
Active Comparator: Remdesivir
Remdesivir (daily infusion for 10 days)
200 mg intravenous loading dose on Day 1, and 100mg intravenous once-daily for subsequent doses from Day 2 up to Day 10.
Active Comparator: Acalabrutinib
Acalabrutinib (orally twice daily for 10 days)
100 mg capsules twice daily every 12 h for 10 days taken with or without food.
Active Comparator: Interferon
Interferon β1a(daily injection for 6 days).
Interferon ß-1a will be administered intravenously at the dose of 10 μg once daily for 6 days if oxygen dependent or subcutaneously at 44 ug Day 1, Day 3, and Day 6

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
All cause Mortality
Time Frame: Number of days from hospital admission up to 28 days post discharge
Number of days from hospital admission up to 28 days post discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Duration of hospital stay
Time Frame: Number of days from hospital admission to discharge up to 28 days post admission
Number of days from hospital admission to discharge up to 28 days post admission
Time to first receiving ventilation
Time Frame: Number of days from hospital admission to day of receiving ventilatory support up to 28 days post admission
Number of days from hospital admission to day of receiving ventilatory support up to 28 days post admission
Time to admission to the intensive care unit
Time Frame: Number of days from hospital admission to day of admission to intensive care unit up to 28 days post admission
Number of days from hospital admission to day of admission to intensive care unit up to 28 days post admission

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marvin Reid, University of the West Indies

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 30, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on Standard of Care

3
Subscribe