Diagnostic Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Neuropathology

December 15, 2020 updated by: Jinsong Wu

A Multi-center, Prospective, Self-Controlled Diagnostic Accuracy Comparative Studies of Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System for Surgical Neuropathology

This is a multi-center, prospective, self-controlled, diagnostic accuracy comparative study of Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System for Surgical Neuropathology. The investigators will compare the diagnostic efficiency of Artificial Intelligence with that of practicing pathologists, and suppose that the diagnostic efficiency of artificial intelligence in prospective clinical data is no less than that of pathologists.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, 141 patients will be recruited. After being enrolled, the patients will accept surgery and specimens for pathological analysis will be taken according to the routine treatment process.

The histopathologic slides will then be digitized by a whole-slide scanner. The images will be reviewed by gold standard committee for evaluation of ground truth. And then be separately diagnosed by Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System and practicing pathologists. So the investigators can compare the diagnostic efficiency of Artificial Intelligence with that of pathologists, thus understand the gap between artificial intelligence and actual clinical practice.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

141

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients or their guardians understand the research process, agree to use their data, and sign the informed consent form;
  2. Aged >=18 years;
  3. MRI shows intracranial spaceoccupying lesions;
  4. The clinical diagnosis is glioma, metastasis or lymphoma thus requiring surgical treatment;
  5. The patient is willing to accept the surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The patient has serious underlying diseases thus is not suitable for surgery;
  2. After further clinical evaluation, surgical treatment was not the best choice;
  3. The patient participate in clinical research of other drugs or devices;
  4. The researchers believe that there are other factors that will make the patients unable to complete the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Artificial Intelligence
A deep learning based artificial intelligence diagnostic system(DOI:10.1093/neuonc/noaa163)
The investigators will use the Artificial Intelligence Diagnostic System to review the H&E stained slide of each patient and then report the classification of the tumor on a 10-type scale.
Active Comparator: Practicing Pathologists
One pathologist who has at least 5 years of experience
The ordinary pathologist will review the H&E stained slide of each patient(without additional informations such as: Immunohistochemistry et al.) and then report the classification of the tumor on a 10-type scale only bases on the slide images
Other: Gold Standard
A committee composed of two expert pathologists who has at least 10 years of experience and one expert pathologist who has at least 15 years of experience
Firstly, the two expert pathologist(>=10 years of experience) will review the H&E stained slide of each patient on their own (with additional informations such as: Immunohistochemistry et al.) and then report the classification of the tumor on a 10-type scale.If they report the same opinion, that opinion will perform as the ground truth; while if their opinion clash with each other, the expert pathologist(>=15 years of experience) will get involved and the agreement of three experts will perform as the ground truth

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Accuracy of Study Arms
Time Frame: 1 week after the last patient's diagnosis is completed
The number of correctly diagnosed participants by study arms divided by the total number of participants
1 week after the last patient's diagnosis is completed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity and specificity of Study Arms
Time Frame: 1 week after the last patient's diagnosis is completed
Sensitivity and specificity of study arms for each type calculated by 2x2 tables
1 week after the last patient's diagnosis is completed
Spearman Coefficient of Study Arms related to Gold Standard
Time Frame: 1 week after the last patient's diagnosis is completed
Spearman Correlation Analysis between Study Arms and Gold Standard
1 week after the last patient's diagnosis is completed

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Cuiyun Wu, Ph.D, Huashan Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Central Nervous System Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Artificial Intelligence

3
Subscribe