- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04794426
Post-operative Pain and Child Behavior of Hall Technique Versus SDF in the Management of Carious Primary Molars: RCT
Post-operative Pain and Child Behavior of Hall Technique Versus Silver Diamine Fluoride in the Management of Carious Primary Molars: Randomized Clinical Trial
PICO question:
Papulation: children suffering from caries Intervention: Silver Diamine Fluoride Comparison: Hall technique
Outcome:
Primary Outcome: Intraoperative and postoperative pain Measurement device: Face pain scale Revised8 Measurement unit: Score 0-2-4-6-8-10
Secondary Outcome:
- Child Anxiety Measurement device: Venham Anxiety rating scale 9 Measurement unit: Six-point scales 0-1-2-3-4-5
- Child Behavior Measurement device: Venham Behavior rating scale 9 Measurement unit: Six-point scales 0-1-2-3-4-5
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Dental caries, also known as tooth decay, it can occur in primary teeth in early childhood, is formed through interaction between acid-producing bacteria and carbohydrate. The caries develops in both the crowns and roots of teeth. Progress of caries depended on the lifestyle of the child (as high numbers of cariogenic bacteria, inadequate salivary flow, insufficient fluoride exposure and poor oral hygiene). To avoid this disease should follow the proper oral hygiene and improve lifestyle 1. A lot of methods found to treatment the decayed tooth - like; Hall technique and Silver diamine fluoride.
The first report on the Hall Technique published in 2007 by a general dental practitioner from Aberdeen/Scotland, Dr. Norna Hall. Dr. Hall used PMCs to restore carious primary molars rather than using the standard technique, placed them using a simplified method2.
Previous studies have recommended that Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution would exert a preventive result in managing early childhood caries ECC. However, no well-designed clinical trials have yet been performed to study the effect of SDF on caries prevention. the objective is useful in arresting early childhood caries (ECC) 3
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Noura M Alhosaini, B.D.S
- Phone Number: 002 01115877726
- Email: noura.talat@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ahmed m Elkhadem, Ass. Prof
- Phone Number: 002 01064440888
- Email: Ahmed.Elkhadem@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: From 4 to 6 years
- Clinical diagnosis of tooth with caries in primary molars within enamel or dentin without pulp disease
Exclusion Criteria:
- Tooth with signs and symptoms of pulp necrosis
- Tooth with Root caries
- Tooth with Spontaneous pain
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: control group
The group that have caries in primary molars and treat them with Hall Technique
|
The first report on the Hall Technique published in 2007 by a general dental practitioner from Aberdeen/Scotland, Dr. Norna Hall.
Dr. Hall used PMCs to restore carious primary molars rather than using the standard technique, placed them using a simplified method.
|
|
Experimental: experimental group
The group that have caries in primary molars and treat them with Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution would exert a preventive result in managing early childhood caries ECC.
|
Previous studies have recommended that Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution would exert a preventive result in managing early childhood caries ECC.
However, no well-designed clinical trials have yet been performed to study the effect of SDF on caries prevention.
the objective is useful in arresting early childhood caries (ECC)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
post-operative pain
Time Frame: at 2 days
|
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).
Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment.
The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'.
The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
|
at 2 days
|
|
post-operative pain
Time Frame: at 1 week
|
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).
Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment.
The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'.
The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
|
at 1 week
|
|
post-operative pain
Time Frame: at 2 weeks
|
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).
Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment.
The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'.
The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
|
at 2 weeks
|
|
post-operative pain
Time Frame: at 1 month
|
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).
Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment.
The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'.
The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
|
at 1 month
|
|
post-operative pain
Time Frame: at 6 months
|
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).
Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment.
The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'.
The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
|
at 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Child Anxiety
Time Frame: Immediately
|
Venham Anxiety rating scale is a reliable system for rating behavior of children in the dental setting.
Six-point scales 0-1-2-3-4-5
|
Immediately
|
|
Child behavior
Time Frame: Immediately
|
Venham behavior rating scale is a reliable system for rating behavior of children in the dental setting.
Six-point scales 0-1-2-3-4-5
|
Immediately
|
|
Intra operative pain
Time Frame: Immediately
|
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R).
Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment.
The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'.
The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
|
Immediately
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Chair: Sherif B Eltaweil, Prof, Cairo University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 113 (Shenzhen Universisty general hospital)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.