Post-operative Pain and Child Behavior of Hall Technique Versus SDF in the Management of Carious Primary Molars: RCT

May 9, 2021 updated by: Noura Mohamed Alhosaini

Post-operative Pain and Child Behavior of Hall Technique Versus Silver Diamine Fluoride in the Management of Carious Primary Molars: Randomized Clinical Trial

PICO question:

Papulation: children suffering from caries Intervention: Silver Diamine Fluoride Comparison: Hall technique

Outcome:

Primary Outcome: Intraoperative and postoperative pain Measurement device: Face pain scale Revised8 Measurement unit: Score 0-2-4-6-8-10

Secondary Outcome:

  1. Child Anxiety Measurement device: Venham Anxiety rating scale 9 Measurement unit: Six-point scales 0-1-2-3-4-5
  2. Child Behavior Measurement device: Venham Behavior rating scale 9 Measurement unit: Six-point scales 0-1-2-3-4-5

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Dental caries, also known as tooth decay, it can occur in primary teeth in early childhood, is formed through interaction between acid-producing bacteria and carbohydrate. The caries develops in both the crowns and roots of teeth. Progress of caries depended on the lifestyle of the child (as high numbers of cariogenic bacteria, inadequate salivary flow, insufficient fluoride exposure and poor oral hygiene). To avoid this disease should follow the proper oral hygiene and improve lifestyle 1. A lot of methods found to treatment the decayed tooth - like; Hall technique and Silver diamine fluoride.

The first report on the Hall Technique published in 2007 by a general dental practitioner from Aberdeen/Scotland, Dr. Norna Hall. Dr. Hall used PMCs to restore carious primary molars rather than using the standard technique, placed them using a simplified method2.

Previous studies have recommended that Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution would exert a preventive result in managing early childhood caries ECC. However, no well-designed clinical trials have yet been performed to study the effect of SDF on caries prevention. the objective is useful in arresting early childhood caries (ECC) 3

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: From 4 to 6 years
  2. Clinical diagnosis of tooth with caries in primary molars within enamel or dentin without pulp disease

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Tooth with signs and symptoms of pulp necrosis
  2. Tooth with Root caries
  3. Tooth with Spontaneous pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: control group
The group that have caries in primary molars and treat them with Hall Technique
The first report on the Hall Technique published in 2007 by a general dental practitioner from Aberdeen/Scotland, Dr. Norna Hall. Dr. Hall used PMCs to restore carious primary molars rather than using the standard technique, placed them using a simplified method.
Experimental: experimental group
The group that have caries in primary molars and treat them with Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution would exert a preventive result in managing early childhood caries ECC.
Previous studies have recommended that Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) solution would exert a preventive result in managing early childhood caries ECC. However, no well-designed clinical trials have yet been performed to study the effect of SDF on caries prevention. the objective is useful in arresting early childhood caries (ECC)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
post-operative pain
Time Frame: at 2 days
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment. The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'. The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
at 2 days
post-operative pain
Time Frame: at 1 week
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment. The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'. The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
at 1 week
post-operative pain
Time Frame: at 2 weeks
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment. The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'. The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
at 2 weeks
post-operative pain
Time Frame: at 1 month
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment. The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'. The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
at 1 month
post-operative pain
Time Frame: at 6 months
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment. The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'. The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
at 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Child Anxiety
Time Frame: Immediately
Venham Anxiety rating scale is a reliable system for rating behavior of children in the dental setting. Six-point scales 0-1-2-3-4-5
Immediately
Child behavior
Time Frame: Immediately
Venham behavior rating scale is a reliable system for rating behavior of children in the dental setting. Six-point scales 0-1-2-3-4-5
Immediately
Intra operative pain
Time Frame: Immediately
Face Pain Scale Revised Immediately after the treatment, any pain and discomfort experienced by the child were recorded using the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). Each child was asked to mark the face that reflected her or his experienced pain during the treatment. The endpoints were labeled 'no pain' and 'very much pain'. The FPS-R faces were scored as 0-2-4-6-8-10.
Immediately

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Sherif B Eltaweil, Prof, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 20, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 29, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 9, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe