- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04940234
Patient Perceptions of Physician Education and Quality by Race
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Research has documented positive effects of doctor-patient race concordance. Given the low representation of minorities among doctors in the US, this evidence suggests that the path to addressing well-documented racial health disparities involves both increasing diversity among healthcare professionals and improving the quality of interactions in race-discordant doctor-patient relationships. Increased focus on improving minority representation among healthcare professionals, and especially among doctors, naturally raises questions about the equilibrium effects of such initiatives. In this study, the investigators aim to explore one potential avenue for equilibrium effects. A growing literature examines how doctors' behavior and beliefs change with patient race and potentially affect the quality of healthcare interactions. This project examines whether and how patients vary their perceptions of the quality of doctors based on race. Significant variation in the perceived quality of minority healthcare professionals could adversely affect the quality and effectiveness of healthcare interactions involving these professionals. Moreover, the range of potential negative patient attitudes that could be encountered in day-to-day clinical practice may also be considered an anticipatory tax and another barrier for prospective minority trainees.
This projects aim to test the following hypotheses: (1) whether subjects believe Black experts are less educated compared with White experts; (2) whether subject believe Black experts are lower quality compared with White experts; (3) whether there is any variation in these two outcomes based on respondent race. The investigators also explore a potential mechanism by examining the extent to which differences in patients' beliefs about the likely occupation of individuals explains differences in patients' beliefs about educational attainment and quality. In this case, the investigators hypothesize that the race of the individual in the photo may be affecting the weight that individuals put on the "expert attire" treatment.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, 02138
- Harvard University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- participant identifies as Black or White
Exclusion Criteria:
- participant doesn't identify as Black or White
- younger than 25 years old
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Black Expert
Survey respondents are exposed to a Black person wearing expert attire.
|
We plan to recruit subjects and randomly assign them to one of four treatments.
In each treatment arm, the subject will view a photo of a man.
We experimentally vary treatment along two dimensions: whether the man is wearing expert vs. layperson attire and whether the man is white vs. black.
We will survey participants' beliefs about the actors' educational attainment and perceived quality as measured by subjects' willingness to accept medical advice for non-urgent health issues or participate in a clinical trial being led by the individual in the photo.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Black Layperson
Survey respondents are exposed to a Black person wearing layperson's attire.
|
We plan to recruit subjects and randomly assign them to one of four treatments.
In each treatment arm, the subject will view a photo of a man.
We experimentally vary treatment along two dimensions: whether the man is wearing expert vs. layperson attire and whether the man is white vs. black.
We will survey participants' beliefs about the actors' educational attainment and perceived quality as measured by subjects' willingness to accept medical advice for non-urgent health issues or participate in a clinical trial being led by the individual in the photo.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: White Expert
Survey respondents are exposed to a white person wearing expert attire.
|
We plan to recruit subjects and randomly assign them to one of four treatments.
In each treatment arm, the subject will view a photo of a man.
We experimentally vary treatment along two dimensions: whether the man is wearing expert vs. layperson attire and whether the man is white vs. black.
We will survey participants' beliefs about the actors' educational attainment and perceived quality as measured by subjects' willingness to accept medical advice for non-urgent health issues or participate in a clinical trial being led by the individual in the photo.
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: White Layperson
Survey respondents are exposed to a white person wearing layperson's attire.
|
We plan to recruit subjects and randomly assign them to one of four treatments.
In each treatment arm, the subject will view a photo of a man.
We experimentally vary treatment along two dimensions: whether the man is wearing expert vs. layperson attire and whether the man is white vs. black.
We will survey participants' beliefs about the actors' educational attainment and perceived quality as measured by subjects' willingness to accept medical advice for non-urgent health issues or participate in a clinical trial being led by the individual in the photo.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Willingness to Accept Medical Advice
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Survey respondents' willingness to accept the medical advice of the man in the photo.
|
6 months
|
|
Willingness to Participate in a Clinical Trial
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Survey respondents' willingness to participate in a clinical trial led by the man in the photo.
|
6 months
|
|
Education Perception
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Survey respondents' perceived education of the man in the photo.
|
6 months
|
|
Occupation Perception
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Survey respondents' perceived occupation of the man in the photo.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Willingness to Wait
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Survey respondents' willingness to wait for their preferred healthcare provider.
|
6 months
|
|
Perceived Attractiveness
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Survey respondents' perceived attractiveness of the man in the photo.
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB21-0682
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bias, Racial
-
Yale UniversityCompletedPatient Satisfaction | Bias, Racial | Physician-Patient Relations | Bias, SexUnited States
-
Duke UniversityCompletedCommunication | Bias, Racial | Relation, Doctor PatientUnited States
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Completed
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)CompletedCommunication | Chronic Illness | Discrimination, Racial | Bias, RacialUnited States
-
Children's National Research InstituteRecruitingPain | Fractures, Bone | Appendicitis | Bias, RacialUnited States
-
University of British ColumbiaCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Heart and Stroke Foundation... and other collaboratorsCompletedAcute Coronary Syndrome | Racial BiasCanada
-
University of Wisconsin, River FallsCompletedImplicit Bias | Weight Bias | Health Professions EducationUnited States
-
Woman'sPfizer; American Cancer Society, Inc.; Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical...WithdrawnInsulin Resistance | Breast Cancer Stage | Racial BiasUnited States
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingImplicit BiasUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier St AnneCompleted
Clinical Trials on Exposure to a Photo
-
Harvard UniversityCompletedResearcher-Subject RelationsUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthVital StrategiesCompletedOpioid Use Disorder | Substance Use Disorders | Stigma, SocialUnited States
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedPreterm Infants
-
AlyatecCompletedValidation of Strasbourg Environmental Exposure Chamber ALYATEC in Cat Allergic Subjects With AsthmaAllergy | Allergic Asthma | Allergy to CatsFrance
-
Egas Moniz - Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, CRLRecruiting
-
Simon AnnaheimUniversity Children's Hospital, ZurichCompletedSkin Abnormalities | Skin; Injury, Superficial | Skin; Ulcer, DecubitusSwitzerland
-
University of PadovaAzienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Provincia Autonoma di Trento; Fondazione... and other collaboratorsCompletedCognitive Impairment | Anxiety State | Cognitive Decline | Cognitive DeteriorationItaly
-
University of SheffieldCompletedColorectal CancerUnited Kingdom
-
Doctors with Africa - CUAMMCompletedMaternal DeathSierra Leone
-
AlyatecCompletedAllergy | Allergic Asthma | Allergy to House DustFrance