Patient Perceptions of Physician Education and Quality by Race

December 9, 2021 updated by: Marcella Alsan, Harvard University
Research has documented positive effects of doctor-patient race concordance, suggesting that increasing diversity among healthcare professionals may play an important role in addressing well-documented racial health disparities in the US. It also remains critical to improve the quality of interactions in race discordant doctor-patient relationships. However, as health systems consider policies to increase the number of minority healthcare professionals, especially among doctors, questions about the equilibrium effects of such initiatives naturally emerge. In this project, the investigators examine whether and how patients vary their perceptions of healthcare professionals by race.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Research has documented positive effects of doctor-patient race concordance. Given the low representation of minorities among doctors in the US, this evidence suggests that the path to addressing well-documented racial health disparities involves both increasing diversity among healthcare professionals and improving the quality of interactions in race-discordant doctor-patient relationships. Increased focus on improving minority representation among healthcare professionals, and especially among doctors, naturally raises questions about the equilibrium effects of such initiatives. In this study, the investigators aim to explore one potential avenue for equilibrium effects. A growing literature examines how doctors' behavior and beliefs change with patient race and potentially affect the quality of healthcare interactions. This project examines whether and how patients vary their perceptions of the quality of doctors based on race. Significant variation in the perceived quality of minority healthcare professionals could adversely affect the quality and effectiveness of healthcare interactions involving these professionals. Moreover, the range of potential negative patient attitudes that could be encountered in day-to-day clinical practice may also be considered an anticipatory tax and another barrier for prospective minority trainees.

This projects aim to test the following hypotheses: (1) whether subjects believe Black experts are less educated compared with White experts; (2) whether subject believe Black experts are lower quality compared with White experts; (3) whether there is any variation in these two outcomes based on respondent race. The investigators also explore a potential mechanism by examining the extent to which differences in patients' beliefs about the likely occupation of individuals explains differences in patients' beliefs about educational attainment and quality. In this case, the investigators hypothesize that the race of the individual in the photo may be affecting the weight that individuals put on the "expert attire" treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1500

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States, 02138
        • Harvard University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- participant identifies as Black or White

Exclusion Criteria:

  • participant doesn't identify as Black or White
  • younger than 25 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Black Expert
Survey respondents are exposed to a Black person wearing expert attire.
We plan to recruit subjects and randomly assign them to one of four treatments. In each treatment arm, the subject will view a photo of a man. We experimentally vary treatment along two dimensions: whether the man is wearing expert vs. layperson attire and whether the man is white vs. black. We will survey participants' beliefs about the actors' educational attainment and perceived quality as measured by subjects' willingness to accept medical advice for non-urgent health issues or participate in a clinical trial being led by the individual in the photo.
EXPERIMENTAL: Black Layperson
Survey respondents are exposed to a Black person wearing layperson's attire.
We plan to recruit subjects and randomly assign them to one of four treatments. In each treatment arm, the subject will view a photo of a man. We experimentally vary treatment along two dimensions: whether the man is wearing expert vs. layperson attire and whether the man is white vs. black. We will survey participants' beliefs about the actors' educational attainment and perceived quality as measured by subjects' willingness to accept medical advice for non-urgent health issues or participate in a clinical trial being led by the individual in the photo.
EXPERIMENTAL: White Expert
Survey respondents are exposed to a white person wearing expert attire.
We plan to recruit subjects and randomly assign them to one of four treatments. In each treatment arm, the subject will view a photo of a man. We experimentally vary treatment along two dimensions: whether the man is wearing expert vs. layperson attire and whether the man is white vs. black. We will survey participants' beliefs about the actors' educational attainment and perceived quality as measured by subjects' willingness to accept medical advice for non-urgent health issues or participate in a clinical trial being led by the individual in the photo.
EXPERIMENTAL: White Layperson
Survey respondents are exposed to a white person wearing layperson's attire.
We plan to recruit subjects and randomly assign them to one of four treatments. In each treatment arm, the subject will view a photo of a man. We experimentally vary treatment along two dimensions: whether the man is wearing expert vs. layperson attire and whether the man is white vs. black. We will survey participants' beliefs about the actors' educational attainment and perceived quality as measured by subjects' willingness to accept medical advice for non-urgent health issues or participate in a clinical trial being led by the individual in the photo.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Willingness to Accept Medical Advice
Time Frame: 6 months
Survey respondents' willingness to accept the medical advice of the man in the photo.
6 months
Willingness to Participate in a Clinical Trial
Time Frame: 6 months
Survey respondents' willingness to participate in a clinical trial led by the man in the photo.
6 months
Education Perception
Time Frame: 6 months
Survey respondents' perceived education of the man in the photo.
6 months
Occupation Perception
Time Frame: 6 months
Survey respondents' perceived occupation of the man in the photo.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Willingness to Wait
Time Frame: 6 months
Survey respondents' willingness to wait for their preferred healthcare provider.
6 months
Perceived Attractiveness
Time Frame: 6 months
Survey respondents' perceived attractiveness of the man in the photo.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 19, 2021

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 31, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 24, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 25, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB21-0682

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bias, Racial

Clinical Trials on Exposure to a Photo

Subscribe