Psycho-traumatic Consequences of the COVID-19 Health Crisis Among Professionals in Emergency Services (COVER PRO LT)

January 26, 2022 updated by: Elisa Letellier, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Psycho-traumatic Consequences of the COVID-19 Health Crisis Among Professionals in Emergency Services and SAMU: Multicenter Cohort Study (COVid in EmeRgency PROfessionnals Long Term)

The COVID-19 outbreak has been categorized as a pandemic and declared an international public health emergency by WHO. In this context, an exceptional mobilization and a complete reorganization of the organization of the healthcare offer was put in place.The investigators will study the psychological consequences among emergency department (ED) / SAMU (Service d'Aide Médicale Urgente) professionals exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic to high psychological stress due to work overload, changes in practices and fears of contamination.They will evaluate at 9 and 12 months after the end of the second lockdown (July December 2020), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), personal and professional stress, anxiety and depression, burn-out and consumption of anxiolytic products. This is a multi-center study and includes doctors, DE interns and nurses, other paramedics and medical regulatory assistants working in one of the ED or SAMU working during phase 3 of the COVID-19 pandemic. It should make it possible to know the psychological load of the months following the epidemic among health professionals who worked in emergencies during this period and to understand their risk of occurrence of PTSD. These elements are also essential to improve the management of health crises and to put in place preventive measures for health professionals, in particular in anticipation of recurrences, second wave or future new episode.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

71

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pierre-Bénite, France, 69310
        • Service d'Accueil des Urgences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults
  • Administrative and technical medical staff of the Hospices Civils de Lyon
  • Contractual or holder
  • Having participated in the COVER PRO study
  • Working in one of the HCL phase 3 departments of the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Affiliated with a social security system
  • Having signed an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate
  • Major under legal protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Follow-up
PCL-5 autoquestionnaire to make the PTSD diagnosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Existence of a Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) at 12 months using PTSD Scale
Time Frame: 12 months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
: Existence of a PTSD after the end of the second lockdown using the PCL-5 scale (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist, 20 items, self-questionnaire) validated in French for PTSD screening. The presence of a "probable PTSD" will be defined by a cut-off score of 31/80 and at least a positive response to one of the four questions asking if the symptoms were causing difficulties in relations with family, friends, work or in daily life
12 months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Existence of a Post Ttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) 9 months using PTSD Scale
Time Frame: 9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Existence of a PTSD after the end of the second lockdown using the PCL-5 scale (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist, 20 items, self-questionnaire) validated in French for PTSD screening. The presence of a "probable PTSD" will be defined by a cut-off score of 31/80 and at least a positive response to one of the four questions asking if the symptoms were causing difficulties in relations with family, friends, work or in daily life
9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Anxiety evaluation at 12 months using HAD scale
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Existence of anxious symptomatology assessed by the HAD scale. 14 items, cut-off score: 8 suspected disorder, 11: proven disorder
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Anxiety evaluation at 9 months using HAD scale
Time Frame: 9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Existence of anxious symptomatology assessed by the HAD scale. 14 items, cut-off score: 8 suspected disorder, 11: proven disorder
9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Depression evaluation at 12 months using HAD scale
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Existence of depression symptomatology assessed by the HAD scale. 14 items, cut-off score: 8 suspected disorder, 11: proven disorder
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Depression evaluation at 9 months using HAD scale
Time Frame: 9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Existence of depression symptomatology assessed by the HAD scale. 14 items, cut-off score: 8 suspected disorder, 11: proven disorder
9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Presence of a Burn out at 12 months using the Maslach Burnot Inventory (MBI) scale
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Burnout characterized by the Maslach burnout inventory scale. All MBI items are scored using a 7 level frequency ratings from "never" to "daily." The MBI has three component scales: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and personal achievement (8 items). Each scale measures its own unique dimension of burnout.
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Presence of a Burn out at 9 months using the MBI scale
Time Frame: 9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Burnout characterized by the Maslach burnout inventory scale. All MBI items are scored using a 7 level frequency ratings from "never" to "daily." The MBI has three component scales: emotional exhaustion (9 items), depersonalization (5 items) and personal achievement (8 items). Each scale measures its own unique dimension of burnout.
9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Work-related stress measured using Karasek questionnaire at 12 months
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Work-related stress measured using Karasek questionnaire at 12 months
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Work-related stress measured using Karasek questionnaire at 9 months
Time Frame: 9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Work-related stress measured using Karasek questionnaire at 9 months
9months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Consumption of psychoactive substances at 12 months
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Change in the consumption of psychoactive substances at 12 months
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Percentage of patients with psychological Support at 12 months
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Percentage of patients who benefit from a psychological support at 12 months
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Mean number of days of sick leave at 12 months
Time Frame: 12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)
Mean number of days of sick leave at 12 months
12months after the end of the second Lockdown (December 2020)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 12, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 27, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Clinical Trials on PTSD evaluation of emergency room staff 9 and 12 months after the end of second lockdown in France during COvid-19 pandemic

Subscribe