The Patient Cohort of the National Center for Precision Medicine in Leukemia (eTHEMA)

If for years the treatment strategy of leukemia and related disorders (LRDs, including acute leukemias and predisposition syndromes) has been based solely on whether the patient could receive or not intensive chemotherapy and transplantation, the advent of new targeted or less targeted drugs has led to the development of a growing number of new therapeutic approaches, very often offered to specific patient/disease subsets, justifying the generic term of 'precision medicine'.

As an international leukemia center of excellence, THEMA, the French National Center for Precision Medicine in Leukemia (selected as IHUB-2 by the French National Agency for Research), is a care, research, transfer and education initiative located at the Saint-Louis Research Institute (IRSL) in Paris and devoted to precision medicine in leukemia in a real-life environment.

The present non-interventional study (eTHEMA) is a pillar of the whole THEMA project. As a prerequisite for precision medicine, this program focuses on individual data collection, aiming to collect high-quality data not only in patients treated into prospective clinical trials, but in every THEMA patient with a special interest in outpatients' care and research.

The primary objective of this non-interventional study is to describe the baseline characteristics planned treatments and outcomes of patients newly diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-related myelofibrosis, when managed and treated according to standard diagnosis and care practices.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

3000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-related myelofibrosis, when managed and treated according to standard diagnosis and care practices

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with newly diagnosed previously untreated de novo, secondary or therapy-related leukemia or related disorders (LRD), including AML, ALL, HR-MDS (according to the international score IPSS), and MNP-related myelofibrosis
  • Patient informed and not opposed to participating
  • Affiliation to social security or any health insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • LRD which is not morphologically proven (patients with granulocytic sarcoma may be included)
  • Previous treatment for LRD, apart from:

    • Hydroxyurea or previous MDS/MPN-CML therapy in AML patients
    • Steroids, vincristine, intrathecal prophylactic or curative injection or previous CML therapy in ALL patients
    • Erythroid stimulating agents (ESAs), luspatercept, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), eltrombopag or other TPO agonist, iron chelation therapy, hypomethylating agents (HMAs), lenalidomide or any investigational drug previously used to treat MDS in HR-MDS patients
    • Hydroxyurea, standard or pegylated interferon alpha, ruxolitinib or other JAK inhibitors, busulfan, anagrelide, ESAs or any investigational drug previously used to treat MPN in MPN-related myelofibrosis patients
  • Patient under guardianship / curatorship
  • Patient under AME
  • Opposition of the patient to be enrolled in the eTHEMA cohort

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Acute myeloid Leukemia (AML)

Standard and routine care.

For storage,limited volumes of blood or bone marrow aspirate will be added to usual sampling and stored.

For storage,limited volumes of blood or bone marrow aspirate will be added to usual sampling and stored.
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)

Standard and routine care.

For storage,limited volumes of blood or bone marrow aspirate will be added to usual sampling and stored.

For storage,limited volumes of blood or bone marrow aspirate will be added to usual sampling and stored.
High-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)

Standard and routine care.

For storage,limited volumes of blood or bone marrow aspirate will be added to usual sampling and stored.

For storage,limited volumes of blood or bone marrow aspirate will be added to usual sampling and stored.
Myeloproliferative neoplasm -related myelofibrosis

Standard and routine care.

For storage,limited volumes of blood or bone marrow aspirate will be added to usual sampling and stored.

For storage,limited volumes of blood or bone marrow aspirate will be added to usual sampling and stored.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Event Free Survival
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Relapse Free Survival
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Standardized evaluation of hematological response
Time Frame: After induction cycle which is between between day 25 and day 42 for patients treated intensively and between Month 1 and Month 6 for patients treated treated with low intensity regimen
After induction cycle which is between between day 25 and day 42 for patients treated intensively and between Month 1 and Month 6 for patients treated treated with low intensity regimen
Standardized evaluation of hematological response
Time Frame: After first consolidation cycle which is between 1 and 2 months
After first consolidation cycle which is between 1 and 2 months
Standardized evaluation of hematological response
Time Frame: After last consolidation cycle which is between 3 and 8 months
After last consolidation cycle which is between 3 and 8 months
Standardized evaluation of hematological response
Time Frame: Before HSCT
Before HSCT
Standardized evaluation of hematological response
Time Frame: at day 100 after HSCT
at day 100 after HSCT
Standardized evaluation of hematological response
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Minimal measurable residual disease (MRD) response
Time Frame: After induction which is between day 25 and day 42 for patients treated intensively and between month 1 and month 6 for patients with low intensity regimen
After induction which is between day 25 and day 42 for patients treated intensively and between month 1 and month 6 for patients with low intensity regimen
Minimal measurable residual disease (MRD) response
Time Frame: After first consolidation cycle which is between 1 and 2 months
After first consolidation cycle which is between 1 and 2 months
Minimal measurable residual disease (MRD) response
Time Frame: After last consolidation cycle which is between 3 and 8 months
After last consolidation cycle which is between 3 and 8 months
Minimal measurable residual disease (MRD) response
Time Frame: Before HSCT
Before HSCT
Minimal measurable residual disease (MRD) response
Time Frame: at day 100 after HSCT
at day 100 after HSCT
Minimal measurable residual disease (MRD) response
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Incidence of allogeneic HSCT
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Modalities of allogeneic HSCT
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Incidence of hematological relapses
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Type of hematological relapses
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Incidence of hematological progressions
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Type of hematological progressions
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Incidence of MRD relapses
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Incidence of MRD progressions
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Proportions of patients with treatment-related toxicities
Time Frame: at 5 years
Treatment-related toxicities will be Evaluated by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0
at 5 years
Cumulative incidences of relapse
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Quality-of-life assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire
Time Frame: at inclusion
Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at inclusion
Quality-of-life assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire
Time Frame: at the end of induction which is between day 25 and day 42 for patients treated intensively and between month 1 and month 6 for patients with low intensity regimen
Quality-of-life will be assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire.Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at the end of induction which is between day 25 and day 42 for patients treated intensively and between month 1 and month 6 for patients with low intensity regimen
Quality-of-life assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire
Time Frame: after 2 consolidations courses which is between 3 months and 8 months
Quality-of-life will be assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire. Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
after 2 consolidations courses which is between 3 months and 8 months
Quality-of-life assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire
Time Frame: at 3 months after the end of treatment
Quality-of-life will be assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire. Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at 3 months after the end of treatment
Quality-of-life assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire
Time Frame: at 6 months after the end of treatment
Quality-of-life will be assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire. Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at 6 months after the end of treatment
Quality-of-life assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire
Time Frame: at 12 months after the end of treatment
Quality-of-life will be assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire. Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at 12 months after the end of treatment
Quality-of-life assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire
Time Frame: at day 100 after hematopoietic stem cell transplant
Quality-of-life will be assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-C30 v3 questionnaire. Quality of life evaluated using questionnaire "European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire" (EORTC QLQ-C30- v3). The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. A high score for a functional scale represents a high/healthy level of functioning. A high score for the global health status/ QoL represents a high QoL and a high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problems.
at day 100 after hematopoietic stem cell transplant
Incidence of secondary cancer
Time Frame: at 5 years
at 5 years
Incidence of secondary cancer
Time Frame: up to 15 years
up to 15 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 28, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2042

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2042

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Biobanking

Subscribe