INTEGrating Ag-RDTs for COVID-19 in MNCH,HIV and TB Services in Cameroon and Kenya (INTEGRATE)

January 10, 2024 updated by: Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation

INTEGrating Rapid Antigen TEsting for SARS-CoV-2 in Maternal, Neonatal and Child Health, HIV and Tuberculosis Services in Cameroon and Kenya: A Cluster Randomized Trial of Two Models

Integration of antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) for COVID-19 into services that provide care for vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, children, people with HIV infection, and patients with tuberculosis (TB) will identify more people with Coronavirus infection. This will allow for earlier treatment and tracing of contacts to decrease the spread of the coronavirus. This study is looking at two models for providing the testing in Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (MNCH), Tuberculosis (TB) and HIV clinics in Cameroon and Kenya. In some clinics, attendees with be screened for Coronavirus symptoms and history of exposure and if positive they will receive the rapid coronavirus test right in the clinic. In other facilities, all people attending the clinic with be provided with the coronavirus testing even if they screen negative to see how many people are infected but do not show any symptoms. Hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients with the coronavirus infection will be followed to document their illness and health outcomes. We will also ask health care workers about how well the testing in these clinics is working and what are some of their challenges, and collect information about the costs associated with both the models of testing.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rationale: The use of simple, rapid and affordable antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT) to expand access to SARS-CoV-2 testing is being incorporated in many national COVID-19 response plans including Cameroon and Kenya. Targeting populations at high risk of COVID-19 disease, more severe outcomes, and onward transmission to other vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, people living with HIV, and patients with TB has the potential to mitigate the adverse effects of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Data on SARS-CoV-2 infection in these populations in Africa and the feasibility of integrating Ag-RDT within MNCH, HIV, and TB services are limited. Most current programs use a screen and test strategy to identify symptomatic infection and those at risk due to exposure because of the limited availability and costs of broader testing. However, this strategy does not identify those with asymptomatic infection who also contribute to the spread of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Design: We will conduct a pragmatic cluster randomized trial to determine the SARS-CoV-2 case detection rate in facilities randomized to the standard "screen and test" model of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT compared to a "test all" model of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT in MNCH, HIV and TB clinics. We will describe clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection and determine the feasibility and costs associated with each model. In each country, we propose to randomly allocate 10 purposively chosen facilities to the "test all" arm and standard of care arm in a 1:1 ratio. We plan to enroll at least 6000 patients per arm.

Screening and testing data on all individuals attending MNCH, TB and HIV clinics will be recorded in clinic records and captured into an electronic database that will be accessed for this study. SARS-CoV-2 positive patients will be followed prospectively to determine the SARS-CoV-2 cascade from testing, ascertainment of disease status, linkage to care, disease progression, to treatment and outcomes for hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients. Disease progression and outcome data will be collected through phone interviews from patients who are not hospitalized and through interview and medical record extraction for hospitalized patients. SARS-CoV-2 positive study participants will be given contact tracing and testing forms for their contacts, which will capture anonymous testing data when contacts access the Ag-RDT testing at the health facility.

The feasibility of the two models of integration will be captured through a structured questionnaire administered to health care workers and the collection of time-motion data to determine provider and patient time required to conduct the Ag-RDT testing. The service delivery costs of each model (such as personnel, training, equipment, tests, documentation) will be determined.

Outcomes: Primary outcomes include the SARS-CoV-2 case detection rates and the number/ proportion of contacts tested and diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondary outcomes include testing rates, linkage to care, disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients and the feasibility and cost of integration in the two models. The primary analysis will summarize SARS-CoV-2 detection rates and associated 95% confidence intervals for each facility. The overall case identification rates for each arm will be estimated using inverse variance weighted method to combine rates across facilities. The effect of the intervention and associated 95% confidence intervals will be estimated using Poisson regression and expressed as a relative risk. Lower 95% confidence interval limit above 1 will indicate significant increase in the case detection rates due to "test all" intervention. Additional sub group analyses will examine effects of the "test all" intervention across the different clinics and different countries. To account for potential clustering of outcomes by health facility, we will estimate robust standard errors in the regression models.

Duration: it is anticipated that study enrolment will take approximately 4 months with an additional 1 month to complete study follow-up, and 3-4 months for data analysis and reporting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

152082

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Yaoundé, Cameroon
        • Health facilities in Cameroon
      • Nairobi, Kenya
        • Health facilities in Kenya

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 2 years.
  • Identified as SARS-CoV-2 positive during the study.
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent or parental consent +/- assent for the study participation according to the national guidelines

Exclusion Criteria:

• Significant medical or psychological condition that would preclude active study participation or ability to provide informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Test All
MNCH, HIV, and TB clinic attendees are offered SARS-CoV-2 testing regardless of symptoms.
In the "test all" arm, SARS-CoV-2 infection screening questions will be administered to all clinic attendees followed by SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT testing irrespective of screening results.
No Intervention: Screen and Test
Populations are screened and tested for SARS-CoV-2 according to the MOH testing guidelines model.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SARS-CoV-2 case detection rate
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of SARS-CoV-2 infections detected per 100 clinic attendees
6 months
Proportion of contacts tested for SARS-CoV2 infection
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of contacts tested per 100 clinic attendees
6 months
Proportion of contacts identified with SARS-CoV-2 infection
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of contacts testing positive for SARS-CoV2 infection as a proportion of the number contacts tested
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Testing rates, linkage to care, disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of patients accepting (or refusing) testing divided by the total number of patients attending the 3 clinics
6 months
Linkage to care for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients linked to care and treatment divided by the number of SARS-CoV2 positive patients
6 months
Disease progression, treatment and final outcome for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of asymptomatic patients progressing to symptomatic disease and admission to hospital, divided by number asymptomatic patients Number of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 divided by the number of patients with COVID-19
6 months
Feasibility and acceptability of integrating the model and the cost of the test-all versus screen-and-test models
Time Frame: 6 months
  1. Health care provider perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of integrating SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT in their clinics; the ability to provide service, speed of service delivery, and concerns or challenges on the feasibility and acceptability of integration;
  2. Effect of integration on health care providers and patients' time in clinic.
  3. Costs associated with implementation of the "test all" model compared to the "screen and test" model
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rose Otieno Masaba, MD, MSc, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
  • Principal Investigator: Boris Tchounga, MD, PhD, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation
  • Principal Investigator: Nilesh Bhatt, MD,MMed,PhD, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

March 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 17, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized participant data will be made available upon requests directed to the corresponding author. Proposals will be reviewed and approved by the sponsor, investigator, and collaborators on the basis of scientific merit. After approval of a proposal, data can be shared through a secure online platform after signing a data-sharing agreement. All data will be made available for a minimum of 3 years from the end of the trial.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

All data will be made available for a minimum of 3 years from the end of the trial.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact the Principal Investigator (nbhatt@pedaids.org)

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe