- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05386082
Anesthesia Core Quality Metrics Consensus Delphi Study
Development of a Standardized Set of Core Metrics to Assess the Quality of Anesthesia, Perioperative Care, and Acute Pain Management in Canada: Scoping Review and Multidisciplinary Consensus Delphi Study
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background: Improving anesthesiology care and perioperative outcomes is a growing field encompassing quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical education. Multiple consensus initiatives have standardized perioperative endpoints. However, no standard set of metrics exist to evaluate the quality of Canadian anesthesiology care delivery.
Objective: Develop a ranked list of up to 20 metrics, which can be used to evaluate the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management for adult inpatient non-cardiac surgical patients for use in quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical education in the Canadian care context.
Methods: First, the steering committee will conduct a scoping review of the literature to identify candidate metrics, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Metrics will include patient-reported outcome and patient-reported experience measures, quality and safety indicators, process metrics, and Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society recommended practice standards. The search strategy will include English-language articles published or in use within the past seven years (2015/Jan-2022/March) in 1) MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2) grey literature, including guidelines, and 3) existing evaluation metrics used by Canadian departments for quality assurance and improvement. Screening and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers using Covidence.
Next, following approval from the Research Ethics Board and with written informed consent from participants, a multidisciplinary panel of anesthesiologists, people with lived surgical experience (patients, caregivers), surgeons, nurses, internal medicine and family physicians, hospital administrators, and researchers will iteratively review the list of candidate metrics using a modified Delphi process. Independent voting, using surveys over three rounds, will be used to identify the most important metrics to define the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management. Additional cycles may be performed if required.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
British Columbia
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
- St. Paul's Hospital
-
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6H 3N1
- BC Children's Hospital
-
-
Newfoundland and Labrador
-
Saint John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, A1C 5S7
- Memorial University of Newfoundland
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient/family participants must have undergone a surgical experience within the past three years, and have the capacity to provide informed consent.
- All other participants must be actively practising in Canada in the disciplines they represent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants with self-declared conflicts of interest with this project.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Ecologic or Community
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Study participants
|
The study involves a brief demographics survey and Delphi process, i.e. three rounds of information and surveys, in which participants will be asked to score/rank potential metrics.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ranked list of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management quality metrics
Time Frame: late 2022
|
A ranked set of national consensus metrics for evaluating the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management for adult noncardiac surgical patients that can be used for quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical education in the Canadian care context.
Metrics where >70% participants voted "definitely priority" will be marked in the publication as the core metric set.
|
late 2022
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Matthias Görges, PhD, The University of British Columbia
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- H22-00519
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.