Anesthesia Core Quality Metrics Consensus Delphi Study

February 27, 2024 updated by: Matthias Görges, PhD, University of British Columbia

Development of a Standardized Set of Core Metrics to Assess the Quality of Anesthesia, Perioperative Care, and Acute Pain Management in Canada: Scoping Review and Multidisciplinary Consensus Delphi Study

To develop a ranked list of up to 20 metrics, which can be used to evaluate the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management for adult inpatient non-cardiac surgical patients for use in quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical education in the Canadian care context.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Improving anesthesiology care and perioperative outcomes is a growing field encompassing quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical education. Multiple consensus initiatives have standardized perioperative endpoints. However, no standard set of metrics exist to evaluate the quality of Canadian anesthesiology care delivery.

Objective: Develop a ranked list of up to 20 metrics, which can be used to evaluate the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management for adult inpatient non-cardiac surgical patients for use in quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical education in the Canadian care context.

Methods: First, the steering committee will conduct a scoping review of the literature to identify candidate metrics, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. Metrics will include patient-reported outcome and patient-reported experience measures, quality and safety indicators, process metrics, and Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society recommended practice standards. The search strategy will include English-language articles published or in use within the past seven years (2015/Jan-2022/March) in 1) MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2) grey literature, including guidelines, and 3) existing evaluation metrics used by Canadian departments for quality assurance and improvement. Screening and data extraction will be performed by two independent reviewers using Covidence.

Next, following approval from the Research Ethics Board and with written informed consent from participants, a multidisciplinary panel of anesthesiologists, people with lived surgical experience (patients, caregivers), surgeons, nurses, internal medicine and family physicians, hospital administrators, and researchers will iteratively review the list of candidate metrics using a modified Delphi process. Independent voting, using surveys over three rounds, will be used to identify the most important metrics to define the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management. Additional cycles may be performed if required.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
        • St. Paul's Hospital
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6H 3N1
        • BC Children's Hospital
    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • Saint John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, A1C 5S7
        • Memorial University of Newfoundland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The investigators aim to recruit 77 participants with the following characteristics: a) 26 anesthesiologists, b) 26 patients and/or their family members/caregivers, c) 9 surgeons, d) 4 nurses, e) 2 physicians each from internal medicine, emergency department, family practice, family practice anesthetists, and 4 health administrators or quality improvement leads

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient/family participants must have undergone a surgical experience within the past three years, and have the capacity to provide informed consent.
  • All other participants must be actively practising in Canada in the disciplines they represent.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Participants with self-declared conflicts of interest with this project.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Ecologic or Community
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Study participants
The study involves a brief demographics survey and Delphi process, i.e. three rounds of information and surveys, in which participants will be asked to score/rank potential metrics.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ranked list of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management quality metrics
Time Frame: late 2022
A ranked set of national consensus metrics for evaluating the quality of anesthesia, perioperative care, and acute pain management for adult noncardiac surgical patients that can be used for quality improvement and quality assurance, research, and continuing medical education in the Canadian care context. Metrics where >70% participants voted "definitely priority" will be marked in the publication as the core metric set.
late 2022

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Matthias Görges, PhD, The University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 26, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • H22-00519

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No individual participant data will be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe