- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05565521
UNITy-BasED MR-Linac Adaptive Simultaneous Integrated Hypofractionated Boost Trial for High Grade Glioma in the Elderly (UNITED2)
The usual standard of care for patients over 65 diagnosed with glioblastoma ("GBM") or Grade 4 astrocytoma, IDH-mutant is a 3-week course of radiotherapy, with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). This radiation dose and length of treatment are less than what would be given for younger patients, primarily due to unclear survival benefits from randomized trials. However, survival remains dismal, and may be partially due to the reduced radiation dose. Recent studies investigating this have found that increased radiation dose (to the equivalent of what is normally given over 6 weeks in younger patients) over 3 weeks is well-tolerated and has improved survival rates.
Additionally, with the advent of novel technology such as the MR-Linac, adaptive radiotherapy with this regimen using reduced radiation margins is possible. Use of the MR-Linac allows for daily MRI scans to be done prior to treatment, so plans can be adapted to tumour dynamics and anatomical deformations. In this trial, we will examine the outcomes of increased radiation dose, combined with reduced-margin adaptive radiotherapy in this patient population.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient age ≥ 65 years
- Histopathologically confirmed, based on biopsy or surgical resection, glioblastoma or WHO grade 4 astrocytoma, IDH-mutant
- Biopsy or surgical resection performed ≤ 6 weeks prior to study entry
- Deemed suitable by the treating physicians for 15 daily fractions of radiation, delivered daily over 3 weeks, with concurrent temozolomide chemotherapy
- Expected survival ≥ 12 weeks
- ECOG performance status of 0, 1 or 2
- Able (sufficiently fluent in English) and willing to complete QOL questionnaires; however, inability to complete the questionnaires will not make the patient ineligible for the study
- Sufficient estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥ 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 to allow administration of gadolinium-based contrast agent; patients with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 not on dialysis may be allowed on the study after discussion of risks and benefits and approval by study neuroradiologist(s)
- Completed written informed consent
- Patient must be accessible for treatment and follow-up
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindications to MRI as per standard MRI screening policy
- Contraindication to Gadolinium-based contrast media
- Inability to lie flat in a supine position for at least 90 minutes
- Inability to tolerate immobilization in a head thermoplastic mask
- Patients > 140 kg and/or a circumference > 60 cm
- Prior dose-limiting cranial irradiation
- T1w post-gadolinium enhancing disease involving the brainstem
- Leptomeningeal dissemination of disease
- Patients with any condition (e.g. psychological, geographical, etc.) that does not permit compliance with the protocol
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Treatment Arm
Concurrent dose-escalated chemoradiation with temozolomide (TMZ) on the MR-Linac with weekly adaptation
|
Concurrent chemoradiation with temozolomide (TMZ) over 3 weeks (40 Gy in 15 fractions).
The gross tumor volume (GTV) plus margin will be boosted simultaneously (SIB) to 52.5 Gy in 15 fractions.
Radiation will be delivered on the MR-Linac with a reduced clinical target volume (CTV) margin of minimum 5 mm and a weekly online adaptive approach.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Progression-free survival at 6 months following chemoradiation
Time Frame: 6 months from study entry date
|
6 months from study entry date
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall survival
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
The time interval between study start date and date of death from any cause
|
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Progression-free survival
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
The time interval between study start date and date of disease progression or death, whichever comes first
|
Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Local control
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
As assessed on imaging using the Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas (RANO-HGG)
|
Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Patterns of Failure
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
The risk of local, marginal, and distant failure at the time of progression
|
Through study completion, an average of 5 months
|
|
Toxicity and Health-related Quality of Life Changes based on the EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
Adverse events and changes in quality of life before, during, and after chemoradiation therapy
|
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Toxicity and Health-related Quality of Life Changes based on the EORTC QLQ-BN20
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
Adverse events and changes in quality of life before, during, and after chemoradiation therapy
|
Through study completion, an average of 9 months
|
|
Compare differences in adaptive vs non-adaptive with regards to treatment volume
Time Frame: 6-12 months
|
Differences in treatment volume using adaptive vs. non-adaptive treatment planning will be compared
|
6-12 months
|
|
Compare differences in adaptive vs non-adaptive with regards to organ-at-risk doses
Time Frame: 6-12 months
|
Differences in dosing to organs-at-risk using adaptive vs. non-adaptive treatment planning will be compared
|
6-12 months
|
|
Compare differences in adaptive vs non-adaptive with regards to cumulative dose
Time Frame: 6-12 months
|
Differences in cumulative dose of radiation using adaptive vs. non-adaptive treatment planning will be compared
|
6-12 months
|
|
Compare differences in adaptive vs non-adaptive with regards to length of radiation treatment time
Time Frame: 6-12 months
|
Differences in time for radiation treatment using adaptive vs. non-adaptive treatment planning will be compared
|
6-12 months
|
|
Functional Imaging Kinetics as a Correlate of Treatment Response
Time Frame: 12-24 months
|
Temporal changes of functional imaging metrics will be correlated with clinical outcomes
|
12-24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- UNITED2
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.