Nonsurgical Management of Cesarean Scar Niche Related Abnormal Uterine Bleeding

October 21, 2022 updated by: Islam Mohamed Magdi Ammar, Saudi German Hospital - Madinah
A study of the effect of three different nonsurgical methods for management of abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche. The study was conducted at the Obstetrics and Gynaecology department of the Saudi German Hospital in Madinah- Saudi Arabia, during the period between March 2019 to October 2022. The study protocol was in accordance with the Helsinki declaration 1964 and the later amendments. A prospective approval was granted by the human research ethics committee of the hospital and the study participants have signed an informed consent.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study included 158 patients aged between 20 and 40 years who had a history of at least one caesarean delivery and presented with abnormal uterine bleeding in the form of postmenstrual spotting defined as bloody or brownish discharge of more than two days after the end of menstruation, with the total duration of (menses and spotting) of more than 7 days, or intermenstrual bleeding that starts after the end of the menses, who were diagnosed to have a caesarean scar niche by saline infusion sonography. Cesarean scar niche was defined as an anechoic triangular indentation at the site of the previous cesarean scar with a depth of at least 2 mm. Exclusion criteria were: pregnancy, desire for fertility within one year of enrolment in the study, any medical condition contraindicating the use of combined oral contraceptive pills, history of abnormal uterine bleeding dating before the last caesarean section, use of any hormonal treatment 3 months prior to enrolment, coagulopathy, and organic causes of bleeding like uterine fibroids, adenomyosis or endometrial hyperplasia. Saline infusion sonography was done, in which instillation of saline solution into the uterine cavity, enhanced the transvaginal ultrasonographic image by providing a sonolucent contrast medium to allow for better visualization and delineation of the defect. Evaluation was performed according to the 2019 modified Delphi procedure where the basic evaluation of CS niche included measurements of the length, depth and width of the defect, the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and the adjacent myometrial thickness (AMT). All measurements were made in the sagittal plane except the width which was measured in the transverse plane. The 4.5 MHz endovaginal transducer (Canon Xario 200G Ultrasound, Japan) was used.

Using an Open Epi version 3.21 computer-based software, patients were divided into four groups (A, B, C and D). Patients in group A, received Tranexamic acid 1300 mg (2 tablets of 650 mg) three times daily for 5 days starting from the first day of menses for 12 months. Patients in group B, received combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) once daily for 21 days starting from the first day of menses, then to have a one-week pill free period to allow for a withdrawal bleed, and that was repeated for 12 cycles. Patients in group C, received a combination of Tranexamic acid 1300 mg three times daily for 5 days, and a combined oral contraceptive pill once daily for 21 days, both starting from the first day of menses for 12 consecutive cycles. Patients in group D, had the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system inserted into the uterine cavity. The insertion was done by a skilled gynecologist as an outpatient procedure without anesthesia. The possible long- and short-term side effects of the different interventions were carefully discussed with all patients, and those who were willing to participate had signed the informed consent before participation. The primary outcome was the improvement of postmenstrual spotting as reported by the patients in their menstrual diary at each of the follow up visits (three, six, nine and twelve months) after enrolment in the study.

The participants were asked to complete the menstrual diary card that was designed based on that used in the study of Johannes and colleagues in 1996. The illustrated symbols at the top of the card indicated the heaviness of menstrual bleeding (flooding, heavy, normal, light or spotting) and the names of the months were written on the left side of the card.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

158

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Madinah
      • Al Madīnah, Madinah, Saudi Arabia, 41311
        • Saudi German Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 36 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The study included 158 patients aged between 20 and 40 years who had a history of at least one caesarean delivery and presented with abnormal uterine bleeding in the form of postmenstrual spotting defined as bloody or brownish discharge of more than two days after the end of menstruation, with the total duration of (menses and spotting) of more than 7 days, or intermenstrual bleeding that starts after the end of the menses, who were diagnosed to have a caesarean scar niche by saline infusion sonography. Cesarean scar niche was defined as an anechoic triangular indentation at the site of the previous cesarean scar with a depth of at least 2 mm. Saline infusion sonography was done, in which instillation of saline solution into the uterine cavity, enhanced the transvaginal ultrasonographic image by providing a sonolucent contrast medium to allow for better visualization and delineation of the defect. Evaluation was performed according to the 2019 modified Delphi procedure where the basic evaluation of CS niche included measurements of the length, depth and width of the defect, the residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and the adjacent myometrial thickness (AMT). All measurements were made in the sagittal plane except the width which was measured in the transverse plane. The 4.5 MHz endovaginal transducer was used.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria were: pregnancy, desire for fertility within one year of enrolment in the study, any medical condition contraindicating the use of combined oral contraceptive pills, history of abnormal uterine bleeding dating before the last caesarean section, use of any hormonal treatment 3 months prior to enrolment, coagulopathy, and organic causes of bleeding like uterine fibroids, adenomyosis or endometrial hyperplasia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tranexamic acid
Patients in group A, received Tranexamic acid 1300 mg (2 tablets of 650 mg) three times daily for 5 days starting from the first day of menses for 12 months.
Comparing three different nonsurgical management options for abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche.
Active Comparator: Combined oral contraceptive pill
Patients in group B, received combined oral contraceptive pill (OCP) once daily for 21 days (Desogestrel 150 micrograms/ Ethinylestradiol 30 micrograms, tablets), starting from the first day of menses, then to have a one-week pill free period to allow for a withdrawal bleed, and that was repeated for 12 cycles.
Comparing three different nonsurgical management options for abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche.
Active Comparator: Tranexamic acid plus Combined oral contraceptive pill
Patients in group C, received a combination of Tranexamic acid 1300 mg three times daily for 5 days, and a combined oral contraceptive pill once daily for 21 days (Desogestrel 150 micrograms/ Ethinylestradiol 30 micrograms, tablets), both starting from the first day of menses for 12 consecutive cycles.
Comparing three different nonsurgical management options for abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche.
Active Comparator: Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
Patients in group D, had the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system inserted into the uterine cavity. The insertion was done by a skilled gynecologist as an outpatient procedure without anesthesia.
Comparing three different nonsurgical management options for abnormal uterine bleeding caused by cesarean scar niche.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of post-menstrual spotting
Time Frame: 12 months
Improvement of post-menstrual spotting as reported by the patients in their menstrual diary at each of the follow up visits (three, six, nine and twelve months) after enrolment in the study.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Islam Mohamed Magdi Ammar, M.D., Saudi German Hospital - Madinah

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 20, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe