Trial Comparing Conventional Antibiotic Strategies Versus Regimens Guided by Epidemiological Surveillance in Infected Patients With Cirrhosis (SURVIC_STUDY) (SURVIC)

July 2, 2026 updated by: Eva Bonfill

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Conventional Antibiotic Strategies Versus Regimens Guided by Epidemiological Surveillance in Infected Patients With Cirrhosis

Study to comparing conventrional antibiotic strategies versus regimens guided by epidemiological surveillance in infected patients with cirrhosis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

198

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Recruiting
        • Eva Bonfill

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Cirrhotic patients with acute decompensation aged ≥18 years.
  2. Proven or suspected bacterial infection requiring antibiotic therapy (diagnosis will be established according to local guidelines, Appendix 1).
  3. Signed informed consent or consent given by their legal representatives or close relatives.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Bacterial infection lasting for > 48 hours.
  2. Infection in a critically ill cirrhotic patient (ICU admission). In this population, epidemiological surveillance is standard clinical practice.
  3. MDR colonization or infection in the last month.
  4. Evidence of current locally advanced or metastatic malignancy (patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within the Milan criteria and non-melanocytic skin cancer can be included).
  5. Pregnant and/or breast-feeding woman.
  6. Patients who cannot provide prior informed consent and when there is documented evidence that the patient has no legal surrogate decision-maker and it appears unlikely that the patient will regain consciousness or sufficient ability to provide delayed informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional antibiotic strategies
The control group will receive treatment according to the local guidelines of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona.
Treatment according to the local guidelines of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona.
Experimental: Regimens guided by epidemiological surveillance
The experimental group will receive treatment to the local guidelines of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona guided by colonization/epidemiological surveillance.
Treatment according to the local guidelines of the Hospital Clinic de Barcelona guided by colonization/epidemiological surveillance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Probability/rate of participants of developing antibiotic resistance in both treatment arms at 28 days.
Time Frame: 28 days
Measured by the appearance of new colonizations and/or infections by MDROs.
28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Probability of antibiotic resistance development during hospitalization in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28.
Measured by the appearance of new colonizations and/or infections by MDROs.
During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28.
Rate of antibiotic resistance development during hospitalization in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28.
Measured by the appearance of new colonizations and/or infections by MDROs.
During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28.
Rate of MDRO colonization during hospitalization and at 28 days in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.
Measured by the appearance of new colonications by MDROs.
During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.
Probability of MDRO colonization during hospitalization and at 28 days in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.
Measured by the appearance of new colonications by MDROs.
During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.
Rate of MDRO infection during hospitalization and at 28 days in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.
Measured by the appearance of new infections by MDROs.
During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.
Probability of MDRO infection during hospitalization and at 28 days in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.
Measured by the appearance of new infections by MDROs.
During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28 and at 28 days.
Infection resolution rate with initial and final strategies in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the number of infections resolution with initial strategies or final strategies.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Evolution of score ACLF (Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure) in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the result of ACLF score. Minimum ACLF score: 6 points. Maximum ACLF score: 18 points. Higher scores means a worse result.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Evolution of score MELD (Model For End-Stage Liver Disease) in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the result of MELD score. Minimum MELD score: 6 points. Maximum MELD score: 40 points. Higher scores means a worse result.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Evolution of score Child-Pugh in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the result of Child -Pugh score. Minimum Child-Pugh score: 5 points. Maximum Child-Pugh score: 15 points. Higher scores means a worse result.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Evolution of score CLIF-OF (Liver Failure Consortium - Organ Failure) in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the result of CLIF-OF score. Minimum CLIF-OF score: 6 points. Maximum CLIF-OF score: 18 points. Higher scores means a worse result.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Evolution of score CLIF-C AD (Chronic Liver Failure Consortium - non-ACLF patients with Acute Decompensation) in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days

Measured by the result of CLIF-C AD score.

Minimum CLIF-C AD score: 6 points. Maximum CLIF-C AD score: 18 points. Higher scores means a worse result.

Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Evolution of score CLIF-C ACLF (Chronic Liver Failure Consortium - Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure) in both treatment arms.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the result of CLIF-C ACLF score. Minimum CLIF-C ACLF score: 6 points. Maximum CLIF-C ACLF score: 18 points. Higher scores means a worse result.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Days of admission to the ICU if needed.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the days of admission to the ICU.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Days of life support (dialysis, vasopressors, and mechanical ventilation) if needed.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the days of life support.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Days of hospital stay
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the days of hospital stay.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Number of rehospitalizations.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the number of rehospitalizations.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Antibiotics consumption
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the days of antibiotics consumption.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Antibiotics consumption
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days.
Measured by dose of antibiotics.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days.
Antibiotics consumption
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by type of antibiotics.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Health costs
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the cost of antibiotic, cost of hospital/ICU stay and of organ support(s).
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Proportion of participants with antibiotic-related AE, SAEs, SUSARs and other SAEs.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Measured by the number of participants with antibiotic-related AE, SAEs, SUSARs and other SAEs.
Through study completion, an average of 28 days
Hospital survival
Time Frame: During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28.
Number of survival participants
During hospitalization (until discharge), assessed up to day 28.
28-day survival
Time Frame: 28 days
Number of survival participants
28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 11, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2022-001858-33

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe