Sub Omohyoid Suprascapular Nerve Block Versus Interscalene Nerve Block

October 18, 2023 updated by: Hassan Mokhtar Elshorbagy Hetta, Minia University

Sub Omohyoid Suprascapular Nerve Block Versus Interscalene Nerve Block for Postoperative Shoulder Surgery Pain: Randomized Comparative Study.

Shoulder surgery can be very painful surgery after which the use of opioids is often required. The well-known side-effects of opioids (e.g. respiratory depression, somnolence, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus) limit their use in so called 'fast track' surgery and anaesthesia programmes.

the study aimed to compare the effect of sub omohyoid suprascapular nerve block versus interscalene nerve block in preventing postoperative pain and decreasing analgesic consumption in patients scheduled for shoulder surgery

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Minya, Egypt, 61511
        • Recruiting
        • Minia University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18-60 years.
  2. ASA I-II.
  3. Both sexes.
  4. Shoulder surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient refusal
  2. Allergy to local anesthetics
  3. BMI >40 kg/m2
  4. Bleeding diathesis or history of anticoagulant use.
  5. Psychiatric diseases.
  6. Infection of the skin at the site of needle punctures area.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Interscalene brachial plexus
ultrasound-guided interscalene block involves imaging the C5 and C6 roots at approximately the level of the cricoid cartilage, just distal to where they emerge from behind their respective transverse processes and where they lie in the groove between the anterior and middle scalene muscles
The block needle is usually advanced in plane in a lateral-to-medial direction through the middle scalene muscle to contact the nerve roots and inject local anesthetic around them.
Experimental: subomohyoid suprascapular nerve
superficial probe of ultrasound was placed in the transverse plane to visualize the superior trunk in the short axis. The suprascapular nerve was identified as it branched off from the superior trunk and traced until it coursed beneath the inferior belly of the omohyoid muscle.
The block needle was inserted in line with the probe in a lateral-to-medial orientation toward the suprascapular nerve. Local anesthetic solution was then injected after negative aspiration for blood to achieve circumferential spread around the neurovascular bundle

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue pain score
Time Frame: 24 hour
pain score from 0 to 10 which mean 0 no pain and 10 the worst pain ever
24 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time of first analgesic request
Time Frame: 24 hour
the time of first demand rescue analgesia
24 hour
Total analgesic consumption
Time Frame: 24 hour
total fentanyl demand
24 hour
Incidence of any side effects
Time Frame: 24 hour
oxygen desaturation, pneumothorax, dyspnea, and phrenic nerve palsy, block, and opioid-related side effects
24 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: hassan m. hetta, lecturer, minia university/ faculty of medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Post Operative Pain

Clinical Trials on subomohyoid plane block

Subscribe