- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07537036
Analgesic Efficacy of Quadro-Iliac Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane in Total Hip Arthroplasty
Analgesic Efficacy of Quadro-Iliac Plane Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is frequently utilized in elderly patients to address hip pain and restore joint function. Effective postoperative pain management is critical; however, the use of opioids is associated with a range of adverse effects, including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, constipation, respiratory depression, and the risk of dependence.
Quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) has been introduced, combining elements of both posterior and anterior QLB approaches.
Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) was initially described as an analgesic approach for managing thoracic neuropathic pain. This innovative fascial block technique enables sensory blockade across multiple abdominal and thoracic wall segments.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Mohammed S Elsharkawy, MD
- Phone Number: 00201148207870
- Email: mselsharkawy@med.tanta.edu.eg
Study Locations
-
-
El-Gharbia
-
Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt, 31527
- Recruiting
- Tanta university
-
Contact:
- Mohammed S Elsharkawy, MD
- Phone Number: 00201148207870
- Email: mselsharkawy@med.tanta.edu.eg
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18 years.
- Both sexes.
- American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status I-III.
- Undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) under spinal anesthesia.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of allergies to local anesthetics.
- Opioid dependency.
- Body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2.
- Cognitive impairment.
- Bleeding or coagulation disorders.
- Psychiatric and neurological disorder.
- Local infection at the site of injection.
- Severe heart, lung, liver, and renal dysfunction.
- Emergency surgery.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: QIPB group
Patients will receive ipsilateral Quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) using 20ml of bupivacaine 0.25%.
|
Patients will receive ipsilateral Quadro-iliac plane block (QIPB) using 20ml of bupivacaine 0.25%.
|
|
Experimental: ESPB group
Patients will receive ipsilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) using 20ml of bupivacaine 0.25%.
|
Patients will receive ipsilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) using 20ml of bupivacaine 0.25%.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to the first rescue analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Time to the first request for the rescue analgesia will be recorded from the end of surgery to first dose of morphine administrated.
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total morphine consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Rescue analgesia of morphine will be given as 3 mg bolus if the numeric rating scale (NRS) > 3 to be repeated after 30 min if pain persists until the NRS < 4.
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Degree of pain
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Each patient will be instructed about postoperative pain assessment with the numeric rating scale (NRS).
NRS (0 represents "no pain" while 10 represents "the worst pain imaginable").
NRS will be assessed at post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 h postoperatively.
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Quality of recovery
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
The quality of recovery (QoR-15) score, will be assessed 24 hours postoperatively.
This tool consists of 15 questions, each scored on a 10-point scale, yielding a maximum of 150.
It encompasses five domains; physical comfort (questions 1-4, 13), emotional state (questions 9, 10, 14, 15), psychological support (questions 6, 7), physical independence (questions 5, 8), and pain (questions 11, 12
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Incidence of adverse events
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
|
Incidence of adverse events such as bradycardia, hypotension, nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, pruritus, or any other complication will be recorded.
|
24 hours postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 36264PR131011044/3/26
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Analgesic Efficacy
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNot yet recruiting
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompletedTotal Hip Arthroplasty | The Analgesic EfficacyEgypt
-
Federal Research and Clinical Centre of Intensive...RecruitingPain Management | Analgesic Efficacy | Postoperative Care | Analgesic Drugs | Analgesic, Nonopioid | Analgetic ConsumptionRussian Federation
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingAnalgesic Efficacy | Nephrectomy | Open | Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block | External Oblique Intercostal BlockEgypt
-
Kafrelsheikh UniversityCompletedDexmedetomidine | Analgesic Efficacy | Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy | Erector Spinae Plane Block | Subcostal Transverse Abdominis Plane BlockEgypt
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedAnalgesic Efficacy of M-TAPA Block Accomplished Prior to Surgery in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecological SurgeriesEgypt
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedAnalgesic Efficacy | Epidural | Racz Catheter | Neuroplasty | Lumbar Fixation | Lumbosacral SpondylolisthesisEgypt
-
Brno University HospitalCompletedThe Efficacy of Analgesic Methods After Caesarean SectionCzech Republic
-
Lundbeck FoundationCompletedPostoperative Pain | Analgesic EfficacyDenmark
Clinical Trials on Quadro-iliac plane block
-
Bursa City HospitalRecruitingPostoperative PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Cumhuriyet UniversityActive, not recruitingPostoperative Pain | Percutaneous NephrolithotomyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Bursa City HospitalRecruitingPain, PostoperativeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Hitit UniversityEnrolling by invitationPostoperative PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Samsun UniversityRecruitingAcute Pain | Spinal StenosisTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Bursa City HospitalNot yet recruitingPain, PostoperativeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Hitit UniversityRecruitingPost Operative PainTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Bursa City HospitalRecruitingPostoperative Pain ManagementTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Cumhuriyet UniversityNot yet recruiting