Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Infraclavicular Subomohyoid Block in Shoulder Surgery

December 13, 2020 updated by: Randa Ali Shoukry, Ain Shams University

Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Infraclavicular Subomohyoid Block in Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Blinded Study

The study aimed to compare Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block versus infraclavicular subomohyoid (ISO) block in the provision of efficacy of either technique in postoperative analgesia in shoulder surgery, aiming to testing the safety of each block in terms of incidence of complications. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups, Group E will receive Erector spinae block and group I will receive infraclavicular subomohyioid block. The local anesthetic solution that will be used in both blocks will be a total volume of 30 mls 0.25%bupivacaine plus 3mg preservative free Dexamethasone. The time between recovery from anesthesia and first pain experienced, as verified by NRS ≥ 3 and first need of a rescue analgesic, will be defined as the duration of analgesia. The total dose of intravenous morphine (the rescue analgesic) used over 24 h postoperatively will be recorded.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients, above 18 years old.
  • ASA physical status I
  • Scheduled for shoulder surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Morbid obese.
  • Previous surgery in the same shoulder.
  • History of psychiatric disorder.
  • Pulmonary disease.
  • Contraindication to regional nerve block (e.g. skin infection at the puncture site, coagulopathy).
  • Allergy to any of medications that will be used

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Erector spinae block

Ultrasound guidance will be used to visualize the transverse processes of T2 and the overlying muscles.

Under sterile conditions, a 5-cm, 21-gauge needle will be inserted using the out-of-plane technique parallel to the sagittal plane directly over the transverse process,then 30mL of the local anesthetic solution will be injected and observed for the linear spread of LA the under direct ultrasound visualization

A 5-cm needle prick in the back of the patient 3 cm lateral to mid-line under sterile conditions, with ultrasound guidance.
Active Comparator: infraclavicular subomohyoid block
Performing posterior approach infraclavicular BP block followed by subomohioid block via the same puncture site under ultrasound guidance.
Under complete aseptic precaution, 12 cm needle will be inserted 2cm superior to the clavicle and advanced retroclavicular, with ultrasound guidance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The block efficacy
Time Frame: 24 hours
Percentage of 24 hours pain free patients
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The incidence of expected complications ( Block safety)
Time Frame: 24 hours
The incidence of expected complications such as phrenic nerve palsy or pneumothorax.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 15, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 3, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2020

Last Verified

December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on Erector spinae block

Subscribe