Open vs. Blind Weighing Study In Adolescents and Young Adult With Eating Disorders

September 22, 2025 updated by: Jamal Essayli, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Evaluating Open Weighing and Blind Weighing in the Treatment of Adolescents and Young Adults With Eating Disorders

Current treatments for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with eating disorders (EDs) do not effectively address a central ED symptom - anxiety about weight gain - which contributes to poor outcomes. The proposed study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, efficacy, and underlying mechanisms of an enhanced version of "open weighing," a cognitive-behavioral intervention designed to target anxiety about weight gain in AYAs with EDs. Understanding how to better treat AYAs with EDs, and identifying the mechanisms by which interventions lead to improvement, will aid in the development of more effective and personalized treatments, ultimately improving the lives of AYAs with EDs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The proposed study evaluates the feasibility, acceptability, efficacy, and underlying mechanisms of an enhanced version of "open weighing" (OW), a cognitive-behavioral intervention designed to target anxiety about weight gain in adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with eating disorders (EDs). OW will be compared to an alternative intervention, "blind weighing" (BW), in which individuals are discouraged from seeing, thinking, or talking about their weight. Understanding how to better treat AYAs with EDs, and identifying the mechanisms by which interventions lead to improvement, will aid in the development of more effective and personalized treatments, ultimately improving the lives of AYAs with EDs.

Aim 1. Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of OW and BW for AYAs with EDs.

Hypothesis 1.1: Both OW and BW will be feasible, with no significant differences in rates of recruitment or retention.

Hypothesis 1.2: Both treatments will be rated as highly acceptable, with no significant differences in measures evaluating the acceptability or attitudes about OW and BW.

Aim 2. Test the efficacy of OW and BW. Hypothesis 2.1: OW will result in significantly greater improvements in body mass index and ED symptomatology than BW.

Hypothesis 2.2: OW will result in significantly greater decreases in anxiety about weight gain than BW.

Aim 3. Identify anxiety about weight gain as a key mechanism to target in the treatment of AYAs with EDs.

Hypothesis 3.1: Across both conditions, greater reductions in anxiety about weight gain will be associated with better outcomes at discharge.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must be English speakers.
  • Participants must be between the ages of 12 - 24 years who have been admitted to either the adolescent or young adult Partial Hospital Program (PHP) for eating disorders (EDs) at Penn State Hershey.
  • Participants must also present with an eating disorder (ED) diagnosis that is characterized by anxiety about weight gain, such as anorexia nervosa (AN), Bulimia nervosa (BN), or their subthreshold presentations captured under the other specific feeding or eating disorder (OSFED) category.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be excluded if they are above the age of 24 or below the age of 12 years.
  • Participants who have been identified as non-English speakers.
  • Participants with cognitive impairment will also be excluded from participation.
  • Potential participants will be excluded if they do not meet the diagnostic inclusion criteria noted above.
  • individuals with a diagnosis of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder, as these individuals do not experience anxiety about weight gain will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Open weighing
The open-weighing intervention aims to challenge beliefs about weight gain. The study coordinator (SC) will explain open weighing, discuss any concerns you have about your weight, and construct a weight graph with the number of weeks on the x-axis and weight in pounds on the y-axis. The SC will help identify beliefs about gaining weight, which will be written on a Feared Outcomes Form. The SC will ask you to predict your weight, mark the weight prediction on the graph, weigh you on a standing scale, record your weight, and discuss your responses to seeing your weight, including any reasons for a difference between your predicted and actual weight. Each week, the SC will graph your actual and predicted weights over time and discuss anything that you are learning from this process. The SC will ask you to complete the Feared Outcomes Form once per day over the next week, review it each week, and talk to you about what you are learning from this process.
The open-weighing intervention aims to challenge beliefs about weight gain. The study coordinator (SC) will explain open weighing, discuss any concerns you have about your weight, and construct a weight graph with the number of weeks on the x-axis and weight in pounds on the y-axis. The SC will help identify beliefs about gaining weight, which will be written on a Feared Outcomes Form. The SC will ask you to predict your weight, mark the weight prediction on the graph, weigh you on a standing scale, record your weight, and discuss your responses to seeing your weight, including any reasons for a difference between your predicted and actual weight. Each week, the SC will graph your actual and predicted weights over time and discuss anything that you are learning from this process. The SC will ask you to complete the Feared Outcomes Form once per day over the next week, review it each week, and talk to you about what you are learning from this process.
Active Comparator: Blind weighing
The blind weighing intervention aims to help you see self-weighing as an eating disorder symptom that you should stop, and that weight is not important to your identity or selfesteem. To do this, the study coordinator will explain why blind weighing might be helpful. You will then be asked to step backwards on a standing scale. The study coordinator will record your weight, but will not share your weight information with you. The study coordinator will discourage you from thinking or talking about your weight.
The blind weighing intervention aims to help you see self-weighing as an eating disorder symptom that you should stop, and that weight is not important to your identity or self-esteem. To do this, the study coordinator will explain why blind weighing might be helpful. You will then be asked to step backwards on a standing scale. The study coordinator will record your weight but will not share your weight information with you. The study coordinator will discourage you from thinking or talking about your weight.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Eating Disorder Examination - Self-Report Questionnaire (EDE-Q)
Time Frame: Admission-Baseline
The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) is a 28-item self-report questionnaire. It was designed to assess the range, frequency, and severity of behaviors associated with a diagnosis of an eating disorder. A total score is obtained by summing the four subscales scores and dividing the total by the number of subscales. The score of items are calculated and range from 0 to 36. The higher score indicate greater ED symptoms.
Admission-Baseline
Fear of Food Measure (FOFM)
Time Frame: Admission Baseline
The Fear of Food Measure (FORM) is a 23-item self-report questionnaire. It examines the participant's severity of behaviors associated with a diagnosis of an eating disorder. Each item is scored on a 1-7 scale. The questionnaire range from 23 to 161 meaning 23: no fear of food and 161 meaning severe fear of food.
Admission Baseline
Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ)
Time Frame: Admission- Baseline
The BSQ is a self-reported measurement of the body shape concerns typical of bulimia nervosa and anorexia nervosa. The questionnaire has 34 items scored from 0 to 6 points (least and most impaired, respectively), with the sum of the questions giving a range from 0 to 204.
Admission- Baseline
Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA)
Time Frame: Admission- Baseline
The Clinical Impairment Assessment Questionnaire (CIA) is a 16-item self-report measure of the severity of psychosocial impairment due to eating disorder features and focuses on the past 28 days. The 16 items cover impairment in domains of life that are typically affected by eating disorder psychopathology: mood and self-perception, cognitive functioning, interpersonal functioning, and work performance. The response are scored 0,1,2 and 3 with a higher rating indicating a higher level of impairment. The total range is between 0 and 48.
Admission- Baseline
Eating Disorder Fear Questionnaire (EDFQ)
Time Frame: Admission_Baseline
The Eating Disorder Fear Questionnaire (EDFQ) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire. It examines the participant's severity of behaviors associated with a diagnosis of an eating disorder. The response range between 1 to 7 with a total range of 20 to 140. The higher rating indicating a higher severe impairment.
Admission_Baseline
Eating Disorder-15 (ED 15)
Time Frame: Admission_Baseline
The Eating Disorder-15 (ED-15) is a 15-item measure designed to assess eating psychopathology levels over the preceding week. The 10 items scored from 0 to 6 points (least and most impaired, respectively), with the sum of the questions giving a range from 0 to 6. The additional 5 items focused on the number of days individuals participated in a given behavior, such as the use of laxatives and restrictive eating.
Admission_Baseline
Body Image States Scale (BISS)
Time Frame: Admission_Baseline
The Body Image State Scale (BISS) is a 6-item measure designed to assess body dissatisfaction. The questionnaire is rated on a seven-point scale ranging from "very satisfied" to very dissatisfied".
Admission_Baseline
Approach / Avoidance of weighing Questionnaire (AAWQ)
Time Frame: Admission_Baseline
The Approach / Avoidance of Weighing Questionnaire (AAWQ) is a 9-item measure designed to assess approach and avoidance weighing tendency. The three descriptive items are not included in the approach/avoidance weighing tendencies calculation. Items 1-3 correspond to approach weighing tendency, and items 4-6 correspond to avoidance weighing tendency. Items are scored as follows for both subscales: Totally true of me = 5; Somewhat true of me = 4; Neither true nor untrue of me = 3; Somewhat untrue of me = 2; Totally untrue of me = 1. Items 1-3 are summed to provide the approach weighing tendency subscale and items 4-6 are summed to provide the avoidance weighing tendency subscale, with scores ranging from 3-15. Higher scores on each subscale indicate a higher degree of that subscale's weighing tendency.
Admission_Baseline
Eating Disorder Examination - Self-Report Questionnaire (EDE-Q)
Time Frame: Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
The Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q) is a 28-item self-report questionnaire. It was designed to assess the range, frequency, and severity of behaviors associated with a diagnosis of an eating disorder. A total score is obtained by summing the four subscales scores and dividing the total by the number of subscales. The score of items are calculated and range from 0 to 36. The higher score indicate greater ED symptoms.
Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
Fear of Food Measure (FOFM)
Time Frame: Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
The Fear of Food Measure (FORM) is a 23-item self-report questionnaire. It examines the participant's severity of behaviors associated with a diagnosis of an eating disorder. Each item is scored on a 1-7 scale. The questionnaire range from 23 to 161 meaning 23: no fear of food and 161 meaning severe fear of food.
Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ)
Time Frame: Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
The BSQ is a self-reported measurement of the body shape concerns typical of bulimia nervosa and anorexia nervosa. The questionnaire has 34 items scored from 0 to 6 points (least and most impaired, respectively), with the sum of the questions giving a range from 0 to 204.
Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA)
Time Frame: Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
The Clinical Impairment Assessment Questionnaire (CIA) is a 16-item self-report measure of the severity of psychosocial impairment due to eating disorder features and focuses on the past 28 days. The 16 items cover impairment in domains of life that are typically affected by eating disorder psychopathology: mood and self-perception, cognitive functioning, interpersonal functioning, and work performance. The response are scored 0,1,2 and 3 with a higher rating indicating a higher level of impairment. The total range is between 0 and 48.
Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
Eating Disorder Fear Questionnaire (EDFQ)
Time Frame: Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
The Eating Disorder Fear Questionnaire (EDFQ) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire. It examines the participant's severity of behaviors associated with a diagnosis of an eating disorder. The response range between 1 to 7 with a total range of 20 to 140. The higher rating indicating a higher severe impairment.
Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
Eating Disorder-15 (ED-15)
Time Frame: Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
The Eating Disorder-15 (ED-15) is a 15-item measure designed to assess eating psychopathology levels over the preceding week. The 10 items scored from 0 to 6 points (least and most impaired, respectively), with the sum of the questions giving a range from 0 to 6. The additional 5 items focused on the number of days individuals participated in a given behavior, such as the use of laxatives and restrictive eating.
Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
Body Image State Scale (BISS)
Time Frame: Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
The Body Image State Scale (BISS) is a 6-item measure designed to assess body dissatisfaction. The questionnaire is rated on a seven-point scale ranging from "very satisfied" to very dissatisfied".
Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
Approach / Avoidance of Weighing Questionnaire (AAWQ)
Time Frame: Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks
The Approach / Avoidance of Weighing Questionnaire (AAWQ) is a 9-item measure designed to assess approach and avoidance weighing tendency. The three descriptive items are not included in the calculation of approach/avoidance weighing tendencies. The items 1-3 correspond to approach weighing tendency, and items 4-6 correspond to avoidance weighing tendency. Items are scored as follows for both subscales: Totally true of me = 5; Somewhat true of me = 4; Neither true nor untrue of me = 3; Somewhat untrue of me = 2; Totally untrue of me = 1. Items 1-3 are summed to provide the approach weighing tendency subscale and items 4-6 are summed to provide the avoidance weighing tendency subscale, with scores ranging from 3-15. Higher scores on each subscale indicate a higher degree of that subscale's weighing tendency.
Discharge: No longer than 60 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Personal Reactions to the Rationale questionnaire (PRR)
Time Frame: Admission-Baseline
The Personal Reactions to the Rationale questionnaire (PRR) is a 16-item that assesses participants' attitudes about Open weighing (OW) and Blind weighing (BW). The response range between 1 to 7 with a total range of 24 to 168. The higher rating indicate participants' attitudes about OW and BW.
Admission-Baseline
Credibility Scale (CS)
Time Frame: Admission-Baseline
Credibility Scale (SC) is a 8-item that assesses participants' attitudes about Open weighing (OW) and Blind weighing (BW). The response range between 1 to 7 with a total range of 24 to 168. The higher rating indicate participants' attitudes about OW and BW.
Admission-Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jamal Essayli, Ph.D, Penn State University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 22, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe