Effectiveness Of Tranexamic Acıd Application Wıth Different Doses On Bleeding, Edema And Physician Comfort In Orthognathıc Surgery Patients

March 6, 2024 updated by: Bezmialem Vakif University

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Tranexamic Acid Application Protocol With Different Doses On Bleeding, Edema And Physician Comfort In Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery Patients

The aim of this clinical study conducted in accordance with the information in the literature is to compare the effects of administering tranexamic acid during orthognathic surgery, at different doses. Specifically, investigators aim to compare the effects of administering 1 ampoule IV (approximately 3 mg/kg) and 2 ampoules IV (approximately 6 mg/kg), and evaluate their impact on intraoperative bleeding (ml), surgical duration (min), postoperative swelling, and intraoperative surgical field evaluation (Fromme Scale), by comparing them with control group (applying no drug administration) patient data.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This prospective double blind clinical study was approved by the Bezmialem Vakif University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (2022-E.6706). All patients were provided detailed explanations of the surgical procedure and potential adverse events, underwent preoperative anesthesia assessments, and provided informed consent. A total of 60 patients were included in the study and were randomly assigned to three groups: Study Group 1 (N=20), Study Group 2 (N=20), and Control Group (N=20). In Study Group 1, patients received local anesthesia prior to bimaxillary osteotomy, followed by intravenous administration of 250 mg / 2.5 mL tranexamic acid before starting with the incision. In Study Group 2, patients also received local anesthesia before bimaxillary osteotomy, followed by intravenous administration of 250 mg / 2.5 mL tranexamic acid for le fort 1 and, a second dose of 250 mg / 2.5 mL tranexamic acid was administered for beginning of the sagittal split osteotomy. The Control Group, Group 3, did not receive any medication before or after surgery. All patients underwent bimaxillary surgery using the same surgical technique and same surgical team.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Fatih
      • Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey, 34093
        • Bezmialem Vakıf Universty

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with class 2 or class 3 dentofacial malformation who are planned to undergo bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
  2. Patients who have not had orthognathic surgery before
  3. Patients without cleft lip and palate
  4. Patients without systemic bleeding diets

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Having a systemic disease that affects general health status
  2. Presence of a malignant disease in the head and neck region
  3. Patients who have previously undergone orthognathic surgery
  4. Patients with any bleeding disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: control group
control group patient give no drug administration during bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
onyl ıv saline (NaCl 0.09%)
Active Comparator: group 1(intravenous administration of 250 mg tranexamic acid)
group 1 (TRANEXEL 250 mg/5 mL) patients administered 250 mg tnx acid during the whole bimaxillary orthognathic surgery
tranexamic acid administration 250mg or 500 mg
Active Comparator: group 2 (intravenous administration of 500 mg tranexamic acid)
group 2 (TRANEXEL 250 mg/5 mL) patients administered 500 mg tnx acid during the whole surgery.
tranexamic acid administration 250mg or 500 mg

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
intraoperative bleeding during the surgery (ml)
Time Frame: during the operation time (hour)
the primary outcome is this study is assessment of the intraoperative bleeding: Intraoperative bleeding will be calculated by subtracting the total amount of iv fluid and the amount of irrigation solutions used during surgery from the total amount of aspirate volume.
during the operation time (hour)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative edema calculation for the first 1-3 and 7 day (cm)
Time Frame: post operative 1-3-7 days
the first secondary outcome of this study is post operative edema: Prior to anesthesia induction, Tragus (Tra) and Gonion (Go) points were marked with methylene blue, and distances including Lateral Canthus - Gonion, Tragus-Commissure, and interincisal distances were measured with a paper ruler and recorded as preoperative measurements.Measurements of Lateral Canthus - Gonion, Tragus-Commissure, and Interincisal distances were repeated on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7 for evaluating postoperative edema.
post operative 1-3-7 days
intraoperative surgical site evaluation (Fromme Scale)
Time Frame: during the surgical time (hour)

the second secondary outcome is surgical site evaluation during the surgery. Surgeon evaluate the surgical site according to Fromme Scale per every one hour.

0 = No bleeding, virtually bloodless field

  1. = Bleeding so mild it is not even a surgical nuisance
  2. = Moderate bleeding, a nuisance but without interference with accurate dissection
  3. = Moderate bleeding that moderately compromises surgical dissection
  4. = Heavy but controllable that significantly interferes with dissection
  5. = Massive uncontrollable bleeding
during the surgical time (hour)
Hemoglobin (Hgb) and Hematocrit (Hct) values alteration preoperative and postoperative 2. day
Time Frame: during the preoperative and post operative 2. day
Hemoglobin (Hgb) and Hematocrit (Hct) values were recorded preoperatively and second postoperative day.
during the preoperative and post operative 2. day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Edema

Clinical Trials on Saline

Subscribe