ID-ClimAct. Influence of Social Motives of Clients and Staff on the Social Climate of Secure Settings (ID-ClimAct)

March 24, 2025 updated by: Andrea Canel, University Psychiatric Clinics Basel
The social climate in secure settings is an essential element to successful rehabilitation. Previous studies indicate that staff characteristics are a relevant factor contributing to a beneficial social climate. Yet, secure settings form a specific and challenging work environment. Staff members are faced with clients who present a variety of difficult emotional and behavioural problems. Social motives for caring and cooperation can be blocked in a threatening environment, favouring dysfunctional interpersonal dynamics between individuals. This observational study explores the reciprocal influences of social motives between clients and staff on the social climate within secure settings.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

453

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Basel-Stadt
      • Basel, Basel-Stadt, Switzerland, 4002
        • University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, Clinic for Forensics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study will involve approximately 200 participants, consisting of both clients and staff members from various secure settings such as prisons and forensic psychiatries in Switzerland.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clients who are currently incarcerated within the specified secure settings.
  • Staff members currently employed in the specified secure settings.
  • Individuals (both clients and staff) who are capable of providing informed consent.
  • Clients who are deemed competent and not under any disciplinary restrictions that would preclude participation.
  • Staff members who are directly involved with client care and management.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clients who are not considered competent to provide informed consent.
  • Staff members who do not have direct interactions with clients (e.g., administrative staff not involved in direct care).
  • Clients and staff from open prisons

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Clients
Adult clients in a secure setting (i.e. prison or forensic mental health psychiatry
The CSIV is a self-report measure and assesses interpersonal values using eight octant scales, which are aggregated into overall communion and agency scores, ranging from -4 to +4 .
Other Names:
  • Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values (CSIV; Locke, 2000)
The Impact Message Inventory - Circumplex (IMI-C) Brief Version is a self-report transactional inventory designed to measure a target person's interpersonal behavior on four octant scales dominance, hostility, submissiveness, and friendliness by assessing the covert responses or "impact messages" of another person. Each subscale consists of 7 items, with each item scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). The minimum score per scale is 7 and the maximum score is 28.
Other Names:
  • Impact Message Inventory - Circumplex (IMI-C; Kiesler, 2006)
The CCS is a elf-report inventory, that measures tendencies towards competitiveness versus caring in social interactions. The minimum score for the two subscales competitiveness and caring are 9 and the maximum score is 90.
Other Names:
  • Competitiveness and Caring Scale (CCS; McEwan, Gilbert, & Duarte, 2012)
Staff
Adult staff in a secure setting (including forensic healthcare staff, social workers, probation officers, prison offers, education staff)
The CSIV is a self-report measure and assesses interpersonal values using eight octant scales, which are aggregated into overall communion and agency scores, ranging from -4 to +4 .
Other Names:
  • Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values (CSIV; Locke, 2000)
The Impact Message Inventory - Circumplex (IMI-C) Brief Version is a self-report transactional inventory designed to measure a target person's interpersonal behavior on four octant scales dominance, hostility, submissiveness, and friendliness by assessing the covert responses or "impact messages" of another person. Each subscale consists of 7 items, with each item scored on a 4-point Likert scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much so). The minimum score per scale is 7 and the maximum score is 28.
Other Names:
  • Impact Message Inventory - Circumplex (IMI-C; Kiesler, 2006)
The CCS is a elf-report inventory, that measures tendencies towards competitiveness versus caring in social interactions. The minimum score for the two subscales competitiveness and caring are 9 and the maximum score is 90.
Other Names:
  • Competitiveness and Caring Scale (CCS; McEwan, Gilbert, & Duarte, 2012)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social Climate Perception
Time Frame: Day 1
Measured through Essen Climate Evaluation Schema (EssenCES). The EssenCES uses a 5-point Likert scale for each item, ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). The three subscales Therapeutic Hold, Patients' Cohesion and Experienced Safety each comprises five items, the minimum score for each subscale is 0 and the maximum is 20.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Marc Graf, Prof. Dr., University Psychiatric Clinics Basel

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 31, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 15, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 25, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ID-ClimAct-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Interpersonal Relations

Clinical Trials on CSIV, Social motive

Subscribe