Comparison of the Effects of Therapeutic Touch and Patient Education on Postponed Patients

February 3, 2025 updated by: Mehmet Gunay Uyar, Ataturk University

Comparison of the Effects of Therapeutic Touch and Patient Education on Postponed

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of therapeutic touch and patient education on anxiety, pain, satisfaction levels and physiological parameters of patients and to determine patient experiences. The study will be conducted as a mixed method study. In the study, the effects of therapeutic touch and patient education on anxiety, satisfaction, pain levels and physiological parameters will be compared and the results will be compared. At the same time, qualitative statements of patients will be analyzed in depth and quantitative data will be supported.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study will be conducted with a nested design mixed method in which qualitative and quantitative methods will be used together with two experimental groups (education and therapeutic touch) and one control group. For the quantitative part, patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomized into the experimental and control groups. For randomization, two main groups will be formed as "major" and "minor" according to the degree of operation. The names of these two main groups will be written on two fans. Then both "major" and "minor" groups will be divided into "therapeutic touch group", "patient education group" and "control group". This separation will be done by writing the names of the subgroups on small pieces of paper, and when there is a patient whose surgery is postponed, after determining which main group the patient belongs to according to the degree of operation, a paper will be randomly drawn from the fan by the researcher, and the patient will be admitted to that group according to the subgroup name written on the paper. Only one of the patients lying in the same room will be included in the study to avoid interference. In addition, data will be collected from the patients assigned to all three groups as a result of randomization by using the phenomenological approach method, one of the qualitative research designs, using the face-to-face interview technique. In addition, data will be collected from the patients assigned to all three groups as a result of randomization by using face-to-face interview technique with the phenomenological approach method, one of the qualitative research designs. It is planned to collect qualitative and quantitative data from the same sample. Before collecting the data, the patients will be informed about the study, their written consent will be obtained verbally and digitally with the informed consent form, and then the 21-question Descriptive Characteristics Form will be applied as a conversation with verbal communication method. This process will contribute to the development of communication. Afterwards, the "State-Trait Anxiety Scale" will be applied to the patients in all groups, and qualitative data will be collected from the patients by applying the "Semi-structured Interview Form Before Interventions" prepared by the researcher in addition to the therapeutic touch and patient information groups. Afterwards, the relevant interventions (therapeutic touch or patient education) will be applied to the experimental groups. After the interventions are applied, the patients will be given one hour to rest. Afterwards, the state part of the "State-Trait Anxiety Scale", the "Numerical Proportioning Scale", the "Physiological Parameters Assessment Form" and the "Patient Satisfaction Assessment Form According to Watson Improvement Processes" will be applied to all groups as a post-test. In addition to the experimental groups, the "Semi-structured Interview Form After Interventions" prepared by the researcher will be administered.

Hypotheses of the Research:

H1: Patient education has a positive effect on anxiety in surgical patients whose operations have been postponed.

H2: Patient education has a positive effect on patient satisfaction in surgical patients whose operations have been postponed.

H3: Patient education has a positive effect on pain in surgical patients whose operations have been postponed.

H4: Patient education has a positive effect on physiological parameters in surgical patients whose operations have been postponed.

H5: Therapeutic touch has a positive effect on anxiety in surgical patients whose operations have been postponed.

H6: Therapeutic touch has a positive effect on patient satisfaction in surgical patients whose operations have been postponed.

H7: Therapeutic touch has a positive effect on pain in surgical patients whose operations have been postponed.

H8: Therapeutic touch has a positive effect on physiological parameters in surgical patients whose operations have been postponed Mixed Methods Research Question: How do the findings obtained through quantitative methods regarding the postponement process in surgical patients whose operations have been postponed correspond to the individual interview data conducted to explore the patients' feelings, thoughts, and experiences regarding the postponement process?

Qualitative Research Method Questions:

1) What are the feelings and thoughts of surgical patients whose operations have been postponed regarding the postponement situation? 2) What are the experiences of surgical patients whose operations have been postponed regarding the waiting process? 3) What is the relationship between the postponement of the operation and the anxiety, pain and satisfaction levels of the patients in surgical patients whose operations have been postponed? 4) What are the feelings and thoughts of surgical patients whose operations have been postponed regarding the interventions applied during the waiting process? 5) What are the experiences of surgical patients whose operations have been postponed regarding the interventions applied during the waiting process? 6) What are the expectations of surgical patients whose operations have been postponed from physicians and nurses during the waiting process? The study was planned to be conducted with 78 patients as a result of the power analysis test.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Yakutiye
      • Erzurum, Yakutiye, Turkey, 25030
        • Ataturk University Health Sciences Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be 18 years of age or olde
  • To undergo surgery
  • Postponement of the operation for 24 hours
  • Being able to read, write and communicate in Turkish
  • Not having any vision, hearing or speech problems
  • Volunteering to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Being under 18 years of age
  • Complete cancellation of the operation
  • Postponing the operation for more than 24 hours
  • Having vision, hearing or speech problems that prevent communication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Control group patients will receive routine care and no other intervention will be made within the scope of the study.
Active Comparator: Patient Education Group
The patient education group will be informed about the waiting process that occurs as a result of surgery postponement through an education booklet prepared by the researcher in line with the literature.
Patients whose surgery has been postponed will be educated by the researcher through a booklet regarding the waiting process. The education includes information such as anxiety management, pain management, and re-surgery planning. The booklet consists of 22 pages and a copy is given to each patient in this group. The education lasts between 15-20 minutes and the patients' questions are answered. It is applied in a single session.
Active Comparator: Therapeutic Touch Group
During the waiting period, patients will receive therapeutic touch by a certified researcher.
Therapeutic touch application is applied as a single session and lasts approximately 20-25 minutes. The therapeutic touch that emerges from the artistic aspect of nursing is an energybased practice that does not involve physical contact. Therapeutic touch is a conscious and compassionate effort to direct the flow of one's universal life energy to healing by influencing this energy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-TX)
Time Frame: pre-test: 10 min;post-test: 5 min
The 4-point Likert-type scale consists of two sections, each with 20 questions. The total score that can be obtained from the scale varies between 20 and 80, with a low average score indicating low anxiety and a high average score indicating high anxiety. There are ten reverse items in the State Anxiety Scale (1st, 2nd, 5th, 8th, 20th, 22nd, 25th, 26th, 19th and 20th), and seven reverse items in the Trait Anxiety Scale (21st, 26th, 37th, 30th, 33rd, 36th and 39th). The total score is calculated by subtracting the total weighted score of the reverse items from the total weighted score obtained for the direct items.
pre-test: 10 min;post-test: 5 min

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Pre-test: Administered when the patient is informed about the postponement of the surgery (5 seconds for the patient to answer). Post-test: administered again 1 hour after the pre-test is completed (patient responds in 5 seconds).
This scale, which is used to determine the intensity of pain, requires the patient to describe their pain in numbers. The NRS is a one-dimensional scale consisting of a horizontal line with the words "0 = No pain" on one side and "10 = Unbearable pain" on the other side to measure the level of pain. The score marked by the patient on the scale indicates the level of pain. The higher the marked score, the more severe the pain level becomes. The NRS has been proven to be a valid and reliable measurement tool in determining the intensity of acute pain after surgery in adult and elderly patients and is widely used in clinical and research areas.
Pre-test: Administered when the patient is informed about the postponement of the surgery (5 seconds for the patient to answer). Post-test: administered again 1 hour after the pre-test is completed (patient responds in 5 seconds).
Patient Satisfaction Evaluation Form According to Watson Improvement Processes
Time Frame: 5 min
The first five questions consist of seven-point Likert-type questions scored between 1 and 7. "1" is never, "7" is always, and the sixth question is answered with "Yes-No." The seventh question consists of an open-ended question that evaluates the "moments of care application" in the applied nursing care.
5 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 3, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 5, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 27, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AtaturkU-SBE-MGU-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Surgery

Clinical Trials on Patient Education Group

Subscribe