- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06593184
Efficacy of Trans-spinal Magnetic Stimulation on Functional Mobility in Chronic Stroke Patients
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if trans-spinal magnetic stimulation works to treat gait disorders in chronic stroke adults. It will also learn about the safety of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does trans-spinal magnetic stimulation enhance chronic stroke participants gait and functional mobility? Does the technique cause any side effects?
Researchers will compare trans-spinal magnetic stimulation to a sham (a look-alike stimulation with no real effect) to see if trans-spinal magnetic stimulation works to treat gait disorders and improve functional mobility.
Participants will:
Receive trans-spinal magnetic stimulation with treadmill training or a sham stimulation with treadmill training every day for 2 weeks.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Daniel G Melo, Physical Therapy
- Phone Number: 55 + 81995173332
- Email: gmelodaniel@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 23510-220
- Recruiting
- Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
-
Contact:
- Ana P Fontana
- Phone Number: +55 21 997651800
- Email: fontanaap@gmail.com
-
-
Paraíba
-
João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil, 58051-900
- Recruiting
- Federal University of Paraíba
-
Contact:
- Mayza Felix
- Phone Number: +55 81 99207653
- Email: mayzaleite@gmail.com
-
-
Pernambuco
-
Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil, 50670-420
- Recruiting
- Federal University of Pernambuco
-
Contact:
- Daniel G Melo
- Phone Number: +55 81 995173332
- Email: gmelodaniel@gmail.com
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Daniel G Melo, Physical Therapy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Confirmation of Stroke by digital or physical imaging or medical report
- Gait impairment
- Stroke with at least 6 months after ictus
Exclusion Criteria:
- Metallic implants in spinal cord
- Major orthopedic/rheumatological disorders
- Incapacity of verbal or non-verbal communication
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Active trans-spinal magnetic stimulation
Trans-spinal magnetic stimulation activates afferent spinal roots and increases cortical excitability.
|
Trans-spinal magnetic stimulation activates afferent spinal roots and increases cortical excitability.
Other Names:
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham trans-spinal magnetic stimulation
Treadmill training with masking for trans-spinal magnetic stimulation
|
Sham trans-spinal magnetic stimulation involves masking, where the sound of stimulation persists even though no magnetic pulses are delivered
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Functional Mobility
Time Frame: Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
The Timed-Up and Go (TUG) test is used to evaluate an individual´s capacity to stand up, walk, and sit down.
During the test, the participants are timed from the moment they begin to stand up until they are seated again.
|
Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Independency level
Time Frame: Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
Self-reported independence is assessed using the Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC).
Scores range from 0 (inability to walk even with external help) to 5 (normal ambulation).
|
Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
|
Lower limb motor function
Time Frame: Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
Motor function of the lower limbs is assessed using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment, where scores range from 0 (indicating the worst motor function) to 28 (indicating normal motor function).
|
Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
|
Balance
Time Frame: Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
Capacity to maintain balance during various tasks is assessed using the Mini Balance Evaluation System (MiniBEST-test).
Its scores range from 0 to 28 points.
Lower scores indicate poor balance, while higher scores reflect better balance.
|
Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
|
Perceived change in treatment
Time Frame: End of treatment (2 weeks)
|
Evaluation of how the participant describes the perceived change in their condition since the treatment started, using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGM).
This scale assesses the change in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions, and overall quality of life since the beginning of treatment, ranging from no change or worsening to significant improvement that made a considerable difference.
A score of one indicates no change, while a score of seven represents a substantial improvement.
|
End of treatment (2 weeks)
|
|
Spasticity
Time Frame: Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
Tonus disorders will be assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale, which measures spasticity by grading muscle resistance during passive stretching.
The scale ranges from 0 to 4, where 0 indicates no increase in muscle tone, and 4 represents a limb that is rigid in flexion or extension.
|
Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
|
Sensory Function
Time Frame: Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
Assessed using a method inspired by the ASIA scale, evaluating the lower thoracic, mid-thoracic, and lower cervical dermatomes, where a score of 0 indicates absence of sensitivity and 2 indicates normal sensitivity.
|
Enrollment (Day 0); End of treatment (2 weeks); Follow-up after 30 days post-treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- tsMS_Stroke_Gait
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Stroke
-
National Assembly ClinicBayero University Kano, NigeriaRecruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke Ischemic | Hemiparesis After StrokeNigeria
-
University of PittsburghRecruitingHemorrhagic Stroke | Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source | Ischemic Stroke, Cryptogenic | Recurrent Ischemic Stroke | Ischemic Stroke, EmbolicUnited States
-
Mahidol UniversityNot yet recruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke SurvivorsThailand
-
Mahidol UniversityRecruitingIschemic Stroke | Hemorrhagic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | Chronic Stroke PatientThailand
-
University Hospital, GhentRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke, Acute | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicBelgium
-
Moleac Pte Ltd.Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke, Cardiovascular | Strokes Thrombotic | Stroke, Embolic | Stroke, Cryptogenic
-
Samsung Medical CenterCompletedChronic Stroke | Subacute Stroke | ExoskeletonSouth Korea
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRecruitingStroke, Ischemic | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Stroke, CerebrovascularUnited States
-
IRCCS San Camillo, Venezia, ItalyRecruitingStroke | Stroke, Ischemic | Stroke Sequelae | Stroke HemorrhagicItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusScuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus...Not yet recruitingStroke | Stroke Hemorrhagic | Upper Limb Rehabilitation | Stroke IschemicItaly
Clinical Trials on Trans-spinal magnetic stimulation
-
Universidade Federal de PernambucoRecruitingHealthy IndividualsBrazil
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedMusculoskeletal Pain | Parkinson DiseaseBrazil
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedAdverse Effect of Drug Therapy LevodopaEgypt
-
Universidade Federal de PernambucoRecruitingTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation | Parkinson's Disease (PD) | Spinal Cord Stimulation | Gait DisordersBrazil
-
Universidade Federal de PernambucoCompletedSpinal Cord Injuries (SCI)Brazil
-
German International UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityUniversity of California, Los Angeles; Hospital Authority, Hong KongCompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Cervical Spinal Cord InjuryHong Kong
-
Assiut UniversityCompleted
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityUniversity of California, Los Angeles; Hospital Authority, Hong KongCompletedStroke | Paralysis | Spinal Cord InjuriesHong Kong
-
Christiana Care Health ServicesDupont Applied BiosciencesCompletedAutism Spectrum DisorderUnited States